Korzenie i źródło. Hannah Arendt i Roger Scruton o genezie totalitaryzmu (w Conradowskim kontekście)

W. Ratajczak
{"title":"Korzenie i źródło. Hannah Arendt i Roger Scruton o genezie totalitaryzmu (w Conradowskim kontekście)","authors":"W. Ratajczak","doi":"10.14746/pspsl.2020.37.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The three authors’ community of thought can be noticed in the analysis  of their attitude towards the Nietzschean concept of ressentiment. Arendt observed the ressentiment and contempt of educated people towards society that grew since the mid-eighteenth century. In Conrad’s prose, a specific culmination of such emotions can be found in the character of the Professor in The Secret Agent novel. Scruton understood a totalitarian state as an institutionalised form of executing ressentiment. Another crucial common point of reference for the three authors was the issue of authority.Scruton reminded us that society exists thanks to authority. The opposite of ressentiment seems to be affirmation, while revolutionary aims of radicalrevaluation can be contrasted with conservatism as a philosophy of attachment to what is valuable. One can understand Conrad’s concept of loyalty as such.","PeriodicalId":31050,"journal":{"name":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pspsl.2020.37.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The three authors’ community of thought can be noticed in the analysis  of their attitude towards the Nietzschean concept of ressentiment. Arendt observed the ressentiment and contempt of educated people towards society that grew since the mid-eighteenth century. In Conrad’s prose, a specific culmination of such emotions can be found in the character of the Professor in The Secret Agent novel. Scruton understood a totalitarian state as an institutionalised form of executing ressentiment. Another crucial common point of reference for the three authors was the issue of authority.Scruton reminded us that society exists thanks to authority. The opposite of ressentiment seems to be affirmation, while revolutionary aims of radicalrevaluation can be contrasted with conservatism as a philosophy of attachment to what is valuable. One can understand Conrad’s concept of loyalty as such.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根和源。汉娜·阿伦特和罗杰·斯克鲁顿谈极权主义的起源(在康拉德的语境中)
在分析三位作者对尼采怨恨概念的态度时,可以看出他们的思想共同体。阿伦特观察到,自18世纪中期以来,受过教育的人对社会的怨恨和蔑视与日俱增。在康拉德的散文中,这种情感在小说《特工》中教授的角色中得到了体现。斯克鲁顿将极权主义国家理解为一种执行怨恨的制度化形式。这三位作者的另一个重要的共同参考点是权威问题。斯克鲁顿提醒我们,社会的存在要归功于权威。怨恨的对立面似乎是肯定,而激进重估的革命目标可以与保守主义形成对比,保守主义是一种依附于有价值的东西的哲学。我们可以这样理解康拉德的忠诚概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Podróże z Hanną Szumańską-Grossową „Dobra reprodukcja obrazów”. „Dzieło” Émile’a Zoli w przekładach Aleksandry Callierowej i Hanny Szumańskiej-Grossowej Angielskie strofy i polska lutnia. O przekładach „Melodii hebrajskich” George’a Gordona Byrona pióra Antoniego Edwarda Odyńca Światopogląd jako styl. „Klucze Piotrowe” Rogera Peyrefitte’a w przekładzie Hanny Szumańskiej-Grossowej jako ogniwo tradycji Hanna Szumańska-Grossowa wspomina Konstantego Ildefonsa Gałczyńskiego
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1