Root-zone enrichment of soil-test biological activity and particulate organic carbon and nitrogen under conventional and conservation land management

Alan J. Franzluebbers
{"title":"Root-zone enrichment of soil-test biological activity and particulate organic carbon and nitrogen under conventional and conservation land management","authors":"Alan J. Franzluebbers","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biologically active and intermediately labile fractions of soil organic matter are important features of conservation agricultural management systems. Depth distribution of soil-test biological activity (STBA) and particulate organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) were characterized under cropland, grassland, and woodland across 25 research stations in North Carolina. Most (87%) of the 310 fields sampled were on Ultisols (udults or aquults). Variation in STBA in the surface 30-cm of soil was controlled primarily by land use and to a lesser extent by soil texture and physiographic region. Baseline concentrations of STBA and particulate organic C and N at 30-cm depth were relatively narrowly constrained compared with contents in the 0- to 10-cm depth. Root-zone enrichment (i.e., total minus baseline contents) of STBA (mean ± standard error; kg CO<sub>2</sub>–C ha<sup>−1</sup> 3 d<sup>−1</sup>) followed the order: conventional-till cropland (194 ± 17) &lt; no-till cropland (274 ± 26) &lt; woodland (421 ± 17) &lt; grassland (537 ± 15) across locations. Proportion of root-zone enrichment of soil organic C as particulate organic C was 43 ± 2%. Root-zone enrichment of particulate organic C (Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) followed the order: conventional-till cropland (3.8 ± 0.6) &lt; no-till cropland (8.7 ± 0.8) &lt; grassland (14.1 ± 0.5) &lt; woodland (16.3 ± 0.6) across locations. The C:N ratio of root-zone-enriched particulate organic matter was greater under woodland than under other land uses likely because of N input limitations. Conservation land uses increased root-zone enrichment of these active and intermediately labile fractions independent of soil types and regions in the state.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 6","pages":"1431-1443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biologically active and intermediately labile fractions of soil organic matter are important features of conservation agricultural management systems. Depth distribution of soil-test biological activity (STBA) and particulate organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) were characterized under cropland, grassland, and woodland across 25 research stations in North Carolina. Most (87%) of the 310 fields sampled were on Ultisols (udults or aquults). Variation in STBA in the surface 30-cm of soil was controlled primarily by land use and to a lesser extent by soil texture and physiographic region. Baseline concentrations of STBA and particulate organic C and N at 30-cm depth were relatively narrowly constrained compared with contents in the 0- to 10-cm depth. Root-zone enrichment (i.e., total minus baseline contents) of STBA (mean ± standard error; kg CO2–C ha−1 3 d−1) followed the order: conventional-till cropland (194 ± 17) < no-till cropland (274 ± 26) < woodland (421 ± 17) < grassland (537 ± 15) across locations. Proportion of root-zone enrichment of soil organic C as particulate organic C was 43 ± 2%. Root-zone enrichment of particulate organic C (Mg C ha−1) followed the order: conventional-till cropland (3.8 ± 0.6) < no-till cropland (8.7 ± 0.8) < grassland (14.1 ± 0.5) < woodland (16.3 ± 0.6) across locations. The C:N ratio of root-zone-enriched particulate organic matter was greater under woodland than under other land uses likely because of N input limitations. Conservation land uses increased root-zone enrichment of these active and intermediately labile fractions independent of soil types and regions in the state.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统和保护性土地管理下土壤试验生物活性和颗粒有机碳和氮的根区富集
土壤有机质的生物活性组分和中间不稳定组分是保护性农业管理系统的重要特征。研究了北卡罗莱纳州25个研究站土壤试验生物活性(STBA)和颗粒有机碳(C)、氮(N)在农田、草地和林地的深度分布特征。310个取样田中大多数(87%)在Ultisols上(成人或成年)。土壤表层30 cm的STBA变化主要受土地利用的控制,其次受土壤质地和地理区域的影响。与0 ~ 10 cm深度的含量相比,30 cm深度的STBA和颗粒有机C、N的基线浓度受到相对狭窄的限制。STBA根区富集(即总含量减去基线含量)(平均值±标准误差;kg CO2-C ha - 1 3 d - 1)依次为:常规耕作农田(194±17)<;免耕耕地(274±26)<;林地(421±17)<;草地(537±15)。土壤有机C在根区富集占颗粒有机C的比例为43±2%。根区颗粒有机C (Mg C ha−1)富集程度依次为:常规耕作(3.8±0.6)<;免耕耕地(8.7±0.8)<;草原(14.1±0.5);林地(16.3±0.6)。林地富根区颗粒有机质的C:N比大于其他土地利用方式,可能是受氮素输入的限制。保护性土地利用增加了这些活性组分和中间不稳定组分的根区富集,与土壤类型和区域无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidation dynamics and leaching behavior of elemental sulfur fertilizers in tropical soils with contrasting textures Interactive effects of no-till, cereal rye, and softwood pine-derived biochar on soil health of a no-till northern soybean system Effects of eucalyptus thinning on soil chemical attributes in an unfertilized silvopastoral system 6 years after thinning Repeated use of anion-exchange membranes in soils alters the membrane surface and phosphate-P exchange capacity Simple and effective remediation strategies of Martian perchlorates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1