Gender Representation in Molluscan Eponyms: Disparities and Legacy

Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.4003/006.039.0106
Jann E. Vendetti
{"title":"Gender Representation in Molluscan Eponyms: Disparities and Legacy","authors":"Jann E. Vendetti","doi":"10.4003/006.039.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Scientific names that refer to people are called eponyms and are chosen by species authors as honorific, meaningful, or symbolic. Herein, female and male personal eponyms were analyzed from a dataset of 4,915 molluscan species within eight regions worldwide. Eponyms were 12.5% of all species names, within which 10.6% (n = 65) were female and 89.4% (n = 550) were male. Among gastropods, female eponyms accounted for 3.4–18.9% of eponymous species names; male eponyms were 81.1–96.6%. Among bivalves, species names within five of eight regions included no female eponyms. Cephalopod and chiton species included 22 male eponyms and no female eponyms. Scientists and naturalists were honored as the source of 29.2% of female eponyms and 64.6% of male eponyms. First names were the source of 63.1% of female eponyms and 4.6% of male eponyms. Last names were the source of 93.8% of male eponyms and 35.4% of female eponyms. The most eponyms for a woman (n = 4) honor 20th century American malacologist, A. Myra Keen; the most eponyms for a man (n = 6) honor two 19th century English naturalists, Thomas Nuttall and Robert Swinhoe. Gender asymmetry in molluscan eponyms likely reflects barriers to women's participation in malacology, taxonomy, and systematics until the late 20th century. Recognition of this inequity should inform discussions about female representation in scientific names and provide context for understanding the history of eponyms and the people they honor.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4003/006.039.0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Scientific names that refer to people are called eponyms and are chosen by species authors as honorific, meaningful, or symbolic. Herein, female and male personal eponyms were analyzed from a dataset of 4,915 molluscan species within eight regions worldwide. Eponyms were 12.5% of all species names, within which 10.6% (n = 65) were female and 89.4% (n = 550) were male. Among gastropods, female eponyms accounted for 3.4–18.9% of eponymous species names; male eponyms were 81.1–96.6%. Among bivalves, species names within five of eight regions included no female eponyms. Cephalopod and chiton species included 22 male eponyms and no female eponyms. Scientists and naturalists were honored as the source of 29.2% of female eponyms and 64.6% of male eponyms. First names were the source of 63.1% of female eponyms and 4.6% of male eponyms. Last names were the source of 93.8% of male eponyms and 35.4% of female eponyms. The most eponyms for a woman (n = 4) honor 20th century American malacologist, A. Myra Keen; the most eponyms for a man (n = 6) honor two 19th century English naturalists, Thomas Nuttall and Robert Swinhoe. Gender asymmetry in molluscan eponyms likely reflects barriers to women's participation in malacology, taxonomy, and systematics until the late 20th century. Recognition of this inequity should inform discussions about female representation in scientific names and provide context for understanding the history of eponyms and the people they honor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
软体动物名字中的性别代表:差异与遗产
摘要:指人的科学名称被称为同名,由物种作者选择,具有尊敬性、意义性或象征性。本文分析了全球8个地区4915种软体动物的雌性和雄性人名。其中,雌性占10.6% (n = 65),雄性占89.4% (n = 550)。腹足类中,雌性名占同名种名的3.4-18.9%;男性名占81.1% ~ 96.6%。在双壳类中,8个地区中有5个地区的种名中没有雌性名。头足类和石壳类包括22种雄性同名动物,无雌性同名动物。科学家和博物学家被认为是29.2%的女性和64.6%的男性名字的来源。63.1%的女性名字和4.6%的男性名字来源于名字。93.8%的男性姓氏和35.4%的女性姓氏来源于姓氏。以女性名字命名最多的人(n = 4)是20世纪美国动物学家a·米拉·基恩;一个人的最多的名字(n = 6)是两位19世纪的英国博物学家,托马斯·纳托尔和罗伯特·斯温霍。软体动物名字中的性别不对称可能反映了直到20世纪末女性参与软体动物学、分类学和系统学的障碍。认识到这种不平等应该为有关女性在科学名称中的代表性的讨论提供信息,并为理解名称的历史和它们所纪念的人提供背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1