You are what you read: media, identity, and community in the 2020 Belarusian uprising

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Post-Soviet Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-27 DOI:10.1080/1060586X.2022.2031843
Samuel A. Greene
{"title":"You are what you read: media, identity, and community in the 2020 Belarusian uprising","authors":"Samuel A. Greene","doi":"10.1080/1060586X.2022.2031843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The movement that mobilized to oppose Alyaksandr Lukashenka in August 2020 was notable for its ability to bridge divisions of social class, geography, age, and identity. Almost uniquely among post-Soviet revolutionary movements, the Belarusians who rose up were not divided from those who did not along clearly discernible socio-demographic, ethnic, linguistic, or regional lines. They were, however, separated by one very stark barrier: the one separating the country’s two distinct media systems, one controlled by the state, and one independent. Drawing on an original survey conducted in September 2020, just as the protest movement was reaching its peak, this article finds that respondents’ choice of news media was the strongest and most consistent predictor of their political opinions. Media, then, appear to have served not merely as aggregators of and conduits for social processes generated elsewhere, but as the producers of social and political force in their own right.","PeriodicalId":46960,"journal":{"name":"Post-Soviet Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Soviet Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2031843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT The movement that mobilized to oppose Alyaksandr Lukashenka in August 2020 was notable for its ability to bridge divisions of social class, geography, age, and identity. Almost uniquely among post-Soviet revolutionary movements, the Belarusians who rose up were not divided from those who did not along clearly discernible socio-demographic, ethnic, linguistic, or regional lines. They were, however, separated by one very stark barrier: the one separating the country’s two distinct media systems, one controlled by the state, and one independent. Drawing on an original survey conducted in September 2020, just as the protest movement was reaching its peak, this article finds that respondents’ choice of news media was the strongest and most consistent predictor of their political opinions. Media, then, appear to have served not merely as aggregators of and conduits for social processes generated elsewhere, but as the producers of social and political force in their own right.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你就是你所读的:2020年白俄罗斯起义中的媒体、身份和社区
2020年8月反对亚历山大·卢卡申科的运动以其弥合社会阶级、地理、年龄和身份分歧的能力而闻名。在苏联解体后的革命运动中,起义的白俄罗斯人几乎是独一无二的,他们没有按照明显的社会人口、种族、语言或地区界线将起义的人与没有起义的人区分开来。然而,他们被一个非常明显的障碍隔开:这个国家的两个截然不同的媒体系统,一个由国家控制,一个独立。根据2020年9月进行的一项原始调查,就在抗议运动达到顶峰时,这篇文章发现,受访者对新闻媒体的选择是他们政治观点的最强和最一致的预测因素。因此,媒体似乎不仅是别处产生的社会进程的聚合者和渠道,而且本身也是社会和政治力量的生产者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Quarterly publication featuring the work of prominent Western scholars on the republics of the former Soviet Union providing exclusive, up-to-the-minute analyses of the state of the economy and society, progress toward economic reform, and linkages between political and social changes and economic developments. Published since 1985.
期刊最新文献
Dissecting Putin’s regime ideology Two statisms of Putin’s ideology: from proclamations of patriotic values to welfare promises of wartime mobilization A hidden form of mass event: the law, politics, and practice of single pickets in Russia “You should care by prohibiting all this obscenity”: a public policy analysis of the Russian law banning medical and legal transition for transgender people Authoritarian succession, rules, and conflicts: Tokayev’s gambit and Kazakhstan’s bloody January of 2022 (Qandy Qantar)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1