The Search for Some General Psychological Principles for Improving Intercultural Living in Plural Societies

IF 0.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology and Developing Societies Pub Date : 2023-08-13 DOI:10.1177/09713336231178368
John W Berry
{"title":"The Search for Some General Psychological Principles for Improving Intercultural Living in Plural Societies","authors":"John W Berry","doi":"10.1177/09713336231178368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dramatic increase of intercultural encounters that have resulted from international migration and globalisation has presented challenges for societies, their institutions and their residents. The assumption is usually made that most culturally plural societies and their members seek to engage in positive encounters, rather than having conflictual ones. There are many factors (political, economic and historical) that can promote or limit the attainment of this goal of positive intercultural relations. Beyond these societal-level factors, another set of factors are psychological; these are based on the presence of some shared underlying psychological processes that enable mutual understanding and acceptance. For over 50 years, I have searched for some of these shared psychological principles, guided by some assertions contained in the Canadian policy of multiculturalism. These assertions are the promotion of: feelings of security in a group’s and a person’s place in the society; the presence of social contacts that are mutually respectful; and the existence of multiple identities and ways of living in the diverse population. This article reviews the evidence for these principles, using data from Canadian and international studies. I conclude that this psychological research has provided support for these general principles that are derived from public policy. As a result, they are ripe for possible use in many plural societies now seeking ways to manage and improve their intercultural relations. The journey has been from policy to research, and back to policy formulation and implementation.","PeriodicalId":54177,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Developing Societies","volume":"35 1","pages":"278 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Developing Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09713336231178368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dramatic increase of intercultural encounters that have resulted from international migration and globalisation has presented challenges for societies, their institutions and their residents. The assumption is usually made that most culturally plural societies and their members seek to engage in positive encounters, rather than having conflictual ones. There are many factors (political, economic and historical) that can promote or limit the attainment of this goal of positive intercultural relations. Beyond these societal-level factors, another set of factors are psychological; these are based on the presence of some shared underlying psychological processes that enable mutual understanding and acceptance. For over 50 years, I have searched for some of these shared psychological principles, guided by some assertions contained in the Canadian policy of multiculturalism. These assertions are the promotion of: feelings of security in a group’s and a person’s place in the society; the presence of social contacts that are mutually respectful; and the existence of multiple identities and ways of living in the diverse population. This article reviews the evidence for these principles, using data from Canadian and international studies. I conclude that this psychological research has provided support for these general principles that are derived from public policy. As a result, they are ripe for possible use in many plural societies now seeking ways to manage and improve their intercultural relations. The journey has been from policy to research, and back to policy formulation and implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻求改善多元社会跨文化生活的一些一般心理学原则
国际移徙和全球化导致的跨文化接触急剧增加,给社会、机构和居民带来了挑战。通常的假设是,大多数文化多元的社会及其成员寻求进行积极的接触,而不是发生冲突。有许多因素(政治、经济和历史)可以促进或限制积极的跨文化关系这一目标的实现。除了这些社会层面的因素,还有一组心理因素;这些都是基于一些共同的潜在心理过程的存在,使相互理解和接受。50多年来,在加拿大多元文化主义政策的一些主张的指导下,我一直在寻找这些共同的心理原则。这些主张促进了:一个群体和个人在社会中的地位的安全感;相互尊重的社会交往;以及多元身份的存在和生活方式的多样化人群。本文回顾了这些原则的证据,使用来自加拿大和国际研究的数据。我的结论是,这项心理学研究为这些源于公共政策的一般原则提供了支持。因此,在许多寻求管理和改善其跨文化关系的多元社会中,它们已经成熟。这是一个从政策到研究,再到政策制定和实施的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology and Developing Societies
Psychology and Developing Societies PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Get a better perspective on the role of psychology in the developing world in Psychology and Developing Societies. This unique journal features a common platform for debate by psychologists from various parts of the world; articles based on alternate paradigms, indigenous concepts, and relevant methods for social policies in developing societies; and the unique socio-cultural and historical experiences of developing countries compared to Euro-American societies.
期刊最新文献
Validating Cognitive and Emotional Urges in Comprehending One’s Surroundings: The Case of Attraction from Attitudes Exploring the Influence of Decisionmaking Style and Financial Status of Cancer Patients on Varied Cultural Aspects of Decision Process The Effects of Intermarriages Versus Intramarriages on Intergroup Relationships Among Kurdish Tribes IAPS in India: A Cross-cultural Validation Study of Highly Arousing Emotional Pictures Applying Self-Determination Theory to International Development and Humanitarian Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1