A Text Mining Analysis of US-Chinese Leaders on Trade Policy

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of International Logistics and Trade Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.24006/jilt.2019.17.3.001
Junyeop Lee, Juhyeon Lee
{"title":"A Text Mining Analysis of US-Chinese Leaders on Trade Policy","authors":"Junyeop Lee, Juhyeon Lee","doi":"10.24006/jilt.2019.17.3.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the methodologies of text mining, this paper examines the implications of US and Chinese policies on bilateral trade. Official speeches by political leaders of the U.S. and China on the issues of trade were collected and analytically examined for US-China gaps in major foreign policies, such as bilateral trade and the Belt and Road Initiative. In this paper, a term frequency-inverse document frequency word cloud, a network similarities index, machine learning-processed latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), and structural equivalence are applied to examine the meanings of the speeches. The main arguments in this paper are as follows. First, the document similarity between the speeches of Chinese and US leaders appears to be completely different. Also, while the documents from Chinese leaders are considerably similar, the documents from US leaders differ by far. Secondly, LDA topic analysis indicates that China concentrates more on international and collaborative relationships, while the U.S. has more focus on domestic and economic interests. Third, from a word hierarchy analysis, the basic words used by American and Chinese leaders are also completely different. Agriculture, farmers, automobiles, and negotiations are the basic words for American leaders, but for Chinese leaders, the basic words are planning, markets, and education.","PeriodicalId":36581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2019.17.3.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Using the methodologies of text mining, this paper examines the implications of US and Chinese policies on bilateral trade. Official speeches by political leaders of the U.S. and China on the issues of trade were collected and analytically examined for US-China gaps in major foreign policies, such as bilateral trade and the Belt and Road Initiative. In this paper, a term frequency-inverse document frequency word cloud, a network similarities index, machine learning-processed latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), and structural equivalence are applied to examine the meanings of the speeches. The main arguments in this paper are as follows. First, the document similarity between the speeches of Chinese and US leaders appears to be completely different. Also, while the documents from Chinese leaders are considerably similar, the documents from US leaders differ by far. Secondly, LDA topic analysis indicates that China concentrates more on international and collaborative relationships, while the U.S. has more focus on domestic and economic interests. Third, from a word hierarchy analysis, the basic words used by American and Chinese leaders are also completely different. Agriculture, farmers, automobiles, and negotiations are the basic words for American leaders, but for Chinese leaders, the basic words are planning, markets, and education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美领导人贸易政策文本挖掘分析
本文运用文本挖掘的方法,考察了中美政策对双边贸易的影响。收集了美国和中国政治领导人就贸易问题发表的正式演讲,并分析了美中在双边贸易和“一带一路”倡议倡议等重大外交政策方面的差距。本文应用术语频率逆文档频率词云、网络相似性指数、机器学习处理的潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)和结构等价来检验语音的含义。本文的主要论点如下。首先,中美领导人的讲话在文件上的相似性似乎完全不同。此外,尽管中国领导人的文件相当相似,但美国领导人的文件却大相径庭。其次,LDA主题分析表明,中国更关注国际和合作关系,而美国更关注国内和经济利益。第三,从词汇层次分析来看,中美领导人使用的基本词汇也完全不同。农业、农民、汽车和谈判是美国领导人的基本词汇,但对中国领导人来说,基本词汇是规划、市场和教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
Journal of International Logistics and Trade Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
The mediating effect of eco-innovation on low-carbon supply chain practices toward manufacturing firm performance in Malaysia Global logistics and supply chain integration in the digital era: a focus on China's Belt and Road Initiative Main contents and implications of the 2023 revision of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises* Impact of the chips act on the GVC participation of China's electronics industry A conceptual framework of green supply chain integration toward enterprise performance through ambidextrous green innovation: an organizational capability perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1