The taxation of gap cover policies for individual taxpayers in South Africa: a critical analysis

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE South African Journal of Accounting Research Pub Date : 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1080/10291954.2021.1935674
P. Gerber, Cecileen Greeff
{"title":"The taxation of gap cover policies for individual taxpayers in South Africa: a critical analysis","authors":"P. Gerber, Cecileen Greeff","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2021.1935674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gap cover policies cover the shortfall between medical scheme benefits and the rates the service providers charge and are therefore used by individuals in South Africa to supplement payments of medical expenditure not covered by private medical schemes. Little information is available about the tax consequences of gap cover. The objective of this study is to provide a critical analysis of the issues in the normal tax treatment of gap cover for individual taxpayers in South Africa, and to make recommendations to the South African Revenue Service to mitigate these issues or practical problems. A non-empirical study based on existing literature was performed which includes a critical evaluation and analysis of gap cover policies and existing tax legislation. It is found that gap cover refunds should be subtracted from the qualifying medical expenditure used in the medical tax credit under section 6B of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962. Various factors may lead to incorrect information being reported on the income tax return, this may lead to a section 6B tax credit to which the taxpayer is not entitled, or which is in excess of what the taxpayer is entitled to. It is found that gap cover contributions are not deductible and that not allowing gap cover contributions as a deduction or as a tax credit detracts from the principles of taxation.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"123 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10291954.2021.1935674","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2021.1935674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gap cover policies cover the shortfall between medical scheme benefits and the rates the service providers charge and are therefore used by individuals in South Africa to supplement payments of medical expenditure not covered by private medical schemes. Little information is available about the tax consequences of gap cover. The objective of this study is to provide a critical analysis of the issues in the normal tax treatment of gap cover for individual taxpayers in South Africa, and to make recommendations to the South African Revenue Service to mitigate these issues or practical problems. A non-empirical study based on existing literature was performed which includes a critical evaluation and analysis of gap cover policies and existing tax legislation. It is found that gap cover refunds should be subtracted from the qualifying medical expenditure used in the medical tax credit under section 6B of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962. Various factors may lead to incorrect information being reported on the income tax return, this may lead to a section 6B tax credit to which the taxpayer is not entitled, or which is in excess of what the taxpayer is entitled to. It is found that gap cover contributions are not deductible and that not allowing gap cover contributions as a deduction or as a tax credit detracts from the principles of taxation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非个人纳税人缺口覆盖政策的税收:批判性分析
缺口保险政策弥补了医疗计划福利与服务提供者收取的费率之间的差额,因此南非的个人使用该政策来补充私人医疗计划未涵盖的医疗支出。关于缺口保险的税收后果的信息很少。本研究的目的是对南非个别纳税人的缺口覆盖正常税务处理中的问题进行批判性分析,并向南非税务局提出建议,以减轻这些问题或实际问题。在现有文献的基础上进行了一项非实证研究,其中包括对缺口覆盖政策和现有税收立法的批判性评估和分析。根据《1962年第58号所得税法》第6B节,差额保险退款应从用于医疗税收抵免的合格医疗支出中扣除。各种因素可能导致在所得税申报表上报告不正确的信息,这可能导致纳税人无权获得第6B节税收抵免,或者超过纳税人有权获得的税收抵免。研究发现,缺口覆盖缴款是不可抵扣的,不允许缺口覆盖缴款作为抵扣或作为税收抵免减损了税收原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Impacts of corporate governance attributes on audit quality in emerging economies: The case of India A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and accounting issues: Is it a hype or hope? Is there a gender gap in audit fees in Spain? Explaining the variables involved in audit fees Deductibility of input tax on share issue costs in the context of the broad taxation principles Determinants of the effective tax rate: Board composition of South African firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1