Biomass Analysis by Means of Environmental Economics

S. D. Giakoumatos, O. Kopsidas
{"title":"Biomass Analysis by Means of Environmental Economics","authors":"S. D. Giakoumatos, O. Kopsidas","doi":"10.4236/LCE.2021.121002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The latest years, oil and gas demand reduction \nincurred market turbulences as a result of oil wells exploitation uncertainties \nand new green policies towards sustainability that turn the stakeholders to \neco-friendlier energy sources. A challenging alternative to this direction is \nthe increment of biomass share in the overall consumed energy balance. From \nmany standpoints of view, biomass has minor impact on the CO2-cycle \nbalance “operating” as an offset against CO2 photosynthesis. In the present work, a practically holistic interpretation of \nbiomass energy contribution in our societies was outlined. Expert systems were \ndeveloped as a tool to biomass energy analysis and certain models were presented to approach \nestimation of individual parts of biomass exploitation chain. The tendency of \nenergy crop land availability and best cultivated practices were presented as \nwell. A schematic cost analysis of biomass utilization was performed under most \ncommon operational scenarios. Economic evaluation, future strategic planning \nand environmental impact from energy biomass utilization were all analyzed up \nto a certain point. Biomass as a renewable energy form is expected to bring \nabout a positive cost/benefit ratio. \nBiomass, in general, is easier to handle, (storage-transportation), cost-effective and more beneficial in terms of \ngreenhouse gases (GHG) net emissions as results from an incorporated ad hoc \ndeveloped SWOT analysis.","PeriodicalId":91573,"journal":{"name":"Low carbon economy","volume":"12 1","pages":"22-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Low carbon economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/LCE.2021.121002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latest years, oil and gas demand reduction incurred market turbulences as a result of oil wells exploitation uncertainties and new green policies towards sustainability that turn the stakeholders to eco-friendlier energy sources. A challenging alternative to this direction is the increment of biomass share in the overall consumed energy balance. From many standpoints of view, biomass has minor impact on the CO2-cycle balance “operating” as an offset against CO2 photosynthesis. In the present work, a practically holistic interpretation of biomass energy contribution in our societies was outlined. Expert systems were developed as a tool to biomass energy analysis and certain models were presented to approach estimation of individual parts of biomass exploitation chain. The tendency of energy crop land availability and best cultivated practices were presented as well. A schematic cost analysis of biomass utilization was performed under most common operational scenarios. Economic evaluation, future strategic planning and environmental impact from energy biomass utilization were all analyzed up to a certain point. Biomass as a renewable energy form is expected to bring about a positive cost/benefit ratio. Biomass, in general, is easier to handle, (storage-transportation), cost-effective and more beneficial in terms of greenhouse gases (GHG) net emissions as results from an incorporated ad hoc developed SWOT analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于环境经济学的生物质分析
近年来,由于油井开采的不确定性和新的可持续绿色政策,石油和天然气需求的减少导致了市场动荡,这些政策将利益相关者转向了更环保的能源。这个方向的一个具有挑战性的替代方案是增加生物质在整体消耗能源平衡中的份额。从许多角度来看,生物质对二氧化碳循环平衡的“运行”影响很小,可以抵消二氧化碳光合作用。在目前的工作中,概述了对我们社会中生物质能源贡献的实际全面解释。开发了专家系统作为生物质能源分析的工具,并提出了某些模型来估计生物质开发链的各个部分。还介绍了能源作物土地利用的趋势和最佳栽培方法。在最常见的操作场景下进行了生物质利用的示意性成本分析。对能源生物质利用的经济评价、未来战略规划和环境影响进行了一定程度的分析。生物质作为一种可再生能源,预计将带来正的成本效益比。总的来说,生物质更容易处理(储存-运输),具有成本效益,并且在温室气体净排放方面更有利,这是一项综合的特设SWOT分析的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Carbon Footprint of Electric Vehicles in the United States Evidence-Based Support for Adaptation Policies in Emerging Economies Geospatial Analysis and Modeling of Indoor Air Quality in Some Residential Areas in the Niger Delta, Nigeria Promoting Enterprise Green Development with Market Mechanism Low-Carbon Development of Livestock in China: Evolution, Predicaments and Paths Ahead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1