What factors influence the quality of local governments' digital transparency? Evidence from the Brazilian case

Q3 Social Sciences Opiniao Publica Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-01912022283857
Fellipe Herman, Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques, E. Miola
{"title":"What factors influence the quality of local governments' digital transparency? Evidence from the Brazilian case","authors":"Fellipe Herman, Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques, E. Miola","doi":"10.1590/1807-01912022283857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the factors associated with the quality of transparency of the websites of Brazilian local governments. We also question the extent to which external control institutions have pressured municipal governments to improve their online transparency. Through multiple regression models, we discuss whether and how socio-demographic, political, and economic variables are relevant to explain the differences in e-transparency in 5,563 cities. The results show that, despite an institutionalization process of public transparency led by federal regulatory evolution, experiences at the local level remain heterogeneous. Population size, GDP per capita, education levels, and voter turnout are statistically important to explain the quality of e-transparency experiences. The main conclusion is that external regulators play a crucial role in shaping digital transparency due to the possibility of imposing legal penalties. Effective use of digital media to foster democratic practices involves pressure from external monitoring agencies willing to challenge a bureaucratic culture resistant to openness.","PeriodicalId":35314,"journal":{"name":"Opiniao Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opiniao Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912022283857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the factors associated with the quality of transparency of the websites of Brazilian local governments. We also question the extent to which external control institutions have pressured municipal governments to improve their online transparency. Through multiple regression models, we discuss whether and how socio-demographic, political, and economic variables are relevant to explain the differences in e-transparency in 5,563 cities. The results show that, despite an institutionalization process of public transparency led by federal regulatory evolution, experiences at the local level remain heterogeneous. Population size, GDP per capita, education levels, and voter turnout are statistically important to explain the quality of e-transparency experiences. The main conclusion is that external regulators play a crucial role in shaping digital transparency due to the possibility of imposing legal penalties. Effective use of digital media to foster democratic practices involves pressure from external monitoring agencies willing to challenge a bureaucratic culture resistant to openness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响地方政府数字透明度的因素是什么?来自巴西案件的证据
本文调查了与巴西地方政府网站透明度质量相关的因素。我们还质疑外部控制机构在多大程度上向市政府施压,要求其提高网络透明度。通过多元回归模型,我们讨论了社会人口、政治和经济变量是否以及如何与解释5,563个城市的电子透明度差异相关。结果表明,尽管在联邦监管演变的推动下,公共透明度的制度化进程得以推进,但地方层面的经验仍然不尽相同。人口规模、人均GDP、教育水平和选民投票率在统计上对解释电子透明度体验的质量具有重要意义。主要结论是,由于可能实施法律处罚,外部监管机构在塑造数字透明度方面发挥着至关重要的作用。有效利用数字媒体促进民主实践涉及到外部监督机构的压力,这些机构愿意挑战抵制开放的官僚文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Opiniao Publica
Opiniao Publica Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Opinião Pública is quadrimestral publication of the Center for Studies on Public Opinion (CESOP) of the University fo Campinas, Brazil Created in 1993, its main objective is to establish a specialized academic vehicle to publish articles about theory and methodology in the field of public opinion, political and social behavior, and midia studies
期刊最新文献
Tropical Trump, or a very Brazilian tale? Social class resentment as a moderating factor between anti-PT sentiment and the vote for Jair Bolsonaro in 2018 Eleições municipais de 2016 e 2020 em São Paulo: resultados diferentes, alinhamentos iguais 30 anos de direitos da criança e do adolescente: uma análise da trajetória da política pública no Brasil Polarização política dinâmica: evidências do Brasil , Imagem e contestação: regimes emocionais no enquadramento midiático a eventos de protesto
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1