Exploratory multigroup structural equation modeling approach to analyzing H. pylori infection, serological pepsinogen levels, and life style factors in an elderly population in Costa Rica.

IF 0.3 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY Poblacion y Salud en Mesoamerica Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI:10.15517/psm.v19i2.48113
Gabriel Molina-Castro, Stefany Matarrita-Muñoz, S. Molina-Castro, Ericka Méndez-Chacón, C. Une, Vanessa Ramírez-Mayorga
{"title":"Exploratory multigroup structural equation modeling approach to analyzing H. pylori infection, serological pepsinogen levels, and life style factors in an elderly population in Costa Rica.","authors":"Gabriel Molina-Castro, Stefany Matarrita-Muñoz, S. Molina-Castro, Ericka Méndez-Chacón, C. Une, Vanessa Ramírez-Mayorga","doi":"10.15517/psm.v19i2.48113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work is to describe and analyze the association of PGI/PGII ratio (indicator of gastric atrophy) with H. pylori-CagA and life style factors such as caloric intake, obesity, and harmful habits amongst H. pylori-positive elderly people infected in Costa Rica using an exploratory multigroup structural equations model (SEM). Using a sample of 1748 H. pylori-positive elderly people from CRELES first wave study, a SEM was employed analyze if the relationships between PGI/PGII ratio with levels of H. pylori-CagA, caloric intake, obesity, and harmful habits, differs by sex, age and risk areas subgroups. The proposed SEMs exhibited a good fit in males (RMSEA = 0.039), females (RMSEA = 0.000), low-risk area (RMSEA = 0.038), middle-risk area (RMSEA = 0.042), individuals under 80 years (RMSEA = 0.038) and individuals aged 80 and over (RMSEA = 0.042), while an acceptable fit was observed for the high-risk area (RMSEA = 0.061). Fitted SEMs showed that CagA predicted PG-ratio as expected, with effects increasing with the risk area, but similar between sex and age groups. All indicators measuring obesity (BMI, arms, and waist) showed significant standardized coefficients, with similar effects between sex, age and risk area groups. No other significant effects or differences between groups were identified. We propose a good-fitted SEM model for the possible relationships between CagA and PG ratio and the geographical risk area level for elderly people. No differences were observed on measured parameters between male and female population, or between under 80 years and older individuals.","PeriodicalId":41790,"journal":{"name":"Poblacion y Salud en Mesoamerica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poblacion y Salud en Mesoamerica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/psm.v19i2.48113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work is to describe and analyze the association of PGI/PGII ratio (indicator of gastric atrophy) with H. pylori-CagA and life style factors such as caloric intake, obesity, and harmful habits amongst H. pylori-positive elderly people infected in Costa Rica using an exploratory multigroup structural equations model (SEM). Using a sample of 1748 H. pylori-positive elderly people from CRELES first wave study, a SEM was employed analyze if the relationships between PGI/PGII ratio with levels of H. pylori-CagA, caloric intake, obesity, and harmful habits, differs by sex, age and risk areas subgroups. The proposed SEMs exhibited a good fit in males (RMSEA = 0.039), females (RMSEA = 0.000), low-risk area (RMSEA = 0.038), middle-risk area (RMSEA = 0.042), individuals under 80 years (RMSEA = 0.038) and individuals aged 80 and over (RMSEA = 0.042), while an acceptable fit was observed for the high-risk area (RMSEA = 0.061). Fitted SEMs showed that CagA predicted PG-ratio as expected, with effects increasing with the risk area, but similar between sex and age groups. All indicators measuring obesity (BMI, arms, and waist) showed significant standardized coefficients, with similar effects between sex, age and risk area groups. No other significant effects or differences between groups were identified. We propose a good-fitted SEM model for the possible relationships between CagA and PG ratio and the geographical risk area level for elderly people. No differences were observed on measured parameters between male and female population, or between under 80 years and older individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索性多组结构方程建模方法分析哥斯达黎加老年人幽门螺杆菌感染、血清学胃蛋白酶原水平和生活方式因素。
本工作的目的是使用探索性多组结构方程模型(SEM)描述和分析哥斯达黎加感染幽门螺杆菌阳性老年人的PGI/PGII比率(胃萎缩指标)与幽门螺杆菌CagA和生活方式因素(如热量摄入、肥胖和有害习惯)的关系。使用CRELES第一波研究中1748名幽门螺杆菌阳性老年人的样本,采用SEM分析PGI/PGII比率与幽门螺杆菌CagA水平、热量摄入、肥胖和有害习惯之间的关系是否因性别、年龄和风险区域亚组而异。所提出的SEMs在男性(RMSEA=0.039)、女性(RMSEA=0.000)、低风险地区(RMSEA=0.038)、中风险地区(RMSEA=0.042)、80岁以下个体(RMSEA0.038)和80岁及以上个体(RMSE=0.042)中表现出良好的拟合,而在高风险地区观察到可接受的拟合(RMSEA0.061)。拟合SEMs显示,CagA预测PG比率如预期,其影响随着风险区域的增加而增加,但性别和年龄组之间的影响相似。衡量肥胖的所有指标(BMI、手臂和腰部)都显示出显著的标准化系数,性别、年龄和风险区域组之间的影响相似。未发现其他显著影响或组间差异。我们提出了一个拟合良好的SEM模型,用于研究老年人的CagA和PG比率与地理风险区域水平之间的可能关系。在男性和女性人群之间,或者在80岁以下和老年人之间,测量参数没有观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 E ISOLAMENTO SOCIAL: A SAÚDE MENTAL DE ESTUDANTES DO ENSINO SUPERIOR Determinantes sociales de la enfermedad de Chagas en Costa Rica Factores socioculturales que influyen en la práctica de la lactancia y la alimentación de la madre en una comunidad semiurbana de México Epidemiological and conjunctural characterization of violence in Brazil from 2011 to 2020 Desigualdad de género y paternidad adolescente en dos comunidades indígenas de Chiapas, México
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1