Micropercutaneous Laser Lithotripsy: How to Improve Stone Free Rate

{"title":"Micropercutaneous Laser Lithotripsy: How to Improve Stone Free Rate","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/ajun.02.04.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy is a novel technique with the creation of a 4.85-8F working channel. The advantage of micro-PCNL is the possibility of kidney puncture under direct endoscopic control. Materials and Methods: 99 patients aged 47,3 ± 16.9 years were included in the study. 78 patients had isolated kidney stones (78.8%). The stone size ranged from 8 to 38 mm (13.9 ± 5.4 mm). Group A included stones smaller than 15 mm (57 patients, 57,6%) and Group B included stones larger than 15 mm (42 patients, 42,4%). A 4.85 F percutaneous sheath was used in 38 (38,4%) patients, 8 F sheath was used in 61 (61,6%) patients. A holmium laser for lithotripsy was used in 46.5% cases, the thulium fiber laser in 53.5%. Results: The average surgery time was 39,9 ± 13.7 min (from 13 to 75 min). A stone-free rate (SFR) for patients of both groups was 88.8%. A Double-J stent was placed in 39 (39.4%) patients. In one case conversion to the mini-PCNL was done. In four cases (4%) retrograde stone manipulations were performed through ureteral access sheath. 5 (5.1%) patients required the second micro-PCNL tract. 3 (3%) patients required stenting postoperatively. In 7.1% of cases the episode of acute pyelonephritis developed. In 7 cases (7,1%), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy was required due to residual stones. Conclusions: We recommend using the laser micro-PCNL for the category of patients with severe comorbidities, including coagulopathy. The micro-PCNL could be safely performed in patients with kidney stones larger than 1.5 cm.","PeriodicalId":93064,"journal":{"name":"Advancements in journal of urology and nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancements in journal of urology and nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/ajun.02.04.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy is a novel technique with the creation of a 4.85-8F working channel. The advantage of micro-PCNL is the possibility of kidney puncture under direct endoscopic control. Materials and Methods: 99 patients aged 47,3 ± 16.9 years were included in the study. 78 patients had isolated kidney stones (78.8%). The stone size ranged from 8 to 38 mm (13.9 ± 5.4 mm). Group A included stones smaller than 15 mm (57 patients, 57,6%) and Group B included stones larger than 15 mm (42 patients, 42,4%). A 4.85 F percutaneous sheath was used in 38 (38,4%) patients, 8 F sheath was used in 61 (61,6%) patients. A holmium laser for lithotripsy was used in 46.5% cases, the thulium fiber laser in 53.5%. Results: The average surgery time was 39,9 ± 13.7 min (from 13 to 75 min). A stone-free rate (SFR) for patients of both groups was 88.8%. A Double-J stent was placed in 39 (39.4%) patients. In one case conversion to the mini-PCNL was done. In four cases (4%) retrograde stone manipulations were performed through ureteral access sheath. 5 (5.1%) patients required the second micro-PCNL tract. 3 (3%) patients required stenting postoperatively. In 7.1% of cases the episode of acute pyelonephritis developed. In 7 cases (7,1%), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy was required due to residual stones. Conclusions: We recommend using the laser micro-PCNL for the category of patients with severe comorbidities, including coagulopathy. The micro-PCNL could be safely performed in patients with kidney stones larger than 1.5 cm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创激光碎石术:如何提高结石清除率
简介:微型经皮肾取石术是一种新型的技术,可产生4.85-8F的工作通道。微型PCNL的优点是可以在直接内镜控制下进行肾穿刺。材料和方法:99名年龄为47岁、3岁±16.9岁的患者被纳入研究。孤立性肾结石78例(78.8%),结石大小8~38mm(13.9±5.4mm)。A组包括小于15 mm的结石(57例,57.6%),B组包括大于15 mm的石块(42例,42.4%)。38例(38.4%)患者使用4.85F经皮鞘,61例(61.6%)患者使用8F鞘。钬激光碎石占46.5%,钬纤维激光碎石占53.5%。结果:平均手术时间为39.9±13.7分钟(13~75分钟)。两组患者的无结石率(SFR)均为88.8%。39名(39.4%)患者植入了双J支架。在一个病例中,进行了向迷你PCNL的转换。在4例(4%)中,通过输尿管入路鞘进行了逆行结石操作。5例(5.1%)患者需要第二道微小PCNL。3例(3%)患者术后需要支架植入。7.1%的病例发生急性肾盂肾炎。7例(7.1%)因残余结石需行体外冲击波碎石术。结论:我们建议对包括凝血障碍在内的严重合并症患者使用激光显微PCNL。微小PCNL可安全地用于肾结石直径大于1.5厘米的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Prevalence and Associated Factors of Chronic Kidney Disease at WURH, West Ethiopia, 2022 G C A Promising Approach in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension: Renal Denervation To Assess the Association Between Decreased Uric Acid Level and Blood Pressure Urinary Tract Infections Can Occur in Any Part of the Urinary Tract Chronic Kidney Disease Begins Slowly and Lasts a Long Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1