(Extreme) political polarization and party patronage

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Irish Political Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-09 DOI:10.1080/07907184.2022.2045143
P. Kopecký, Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling, M. Spirova
{"title":"(Extreme) political polarization and party patronage","authors":"P. Kopecký, Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling, M. Spirova","doi":"10.1080/07907184.2022.2045143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The contemporary literature on political parties has identified their gradual but consistent shift away from civil society and towards the state. As parties are becoming ever increasingly dependent on state resources and exclusively interested in governing, as Mair (Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy [Verso Books, 2013]) suggested, and patronage is a fundamental to that relationship, the degree and modes of party patronage becomes pivotal to understanding their performance, and the ways they organize and govern. In this paper we argue that party patronage is likely to be structured by the nature of political competition and explore the effects of political polarization, which is a feature of political competition relatively independent from the precise format of a party system, on patronage practices. We advance a theoretical argument which systematically links different types of political polarization with different patterns of party patronage, arguing that extreme polarization incentivizes political parties to develop heavily partisan strategies of party patronage which, in turn, further fuel political polarization. Thus, we also contribute to burgeoning literature on political polarization and its negative effects on the functioning of both political parties and overall political systems.","PeriodicalId":45746,"journal":{"name":"Irish Political Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2022.2045143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The contemporary literature on political parties has identified their gradual but consistent shift away from civil society and towards the state. As parties are becoming ever increasingly dependent on state resources and exclusively interested in governing, as Mair (Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy [Verso Books, 2013]) suggested, and patronage is a fundamental to that relationship, the degree and modes of party patronage becomes pivotal to understanding their performance, and the ways they organize and govern. In this paper we argue that party patronage is likely to be structured by the nature of political competition and explore the effects of political polarization, which is a feature of political competition relatively independent from the precise format of a party system, on patronage practices. We advance a theoretical argument which systematically links different types of political polarization with different patterns of party patronage, arguing that extreme polarization incentivizes political parties to develop heavily partisan strategies of party patronage which, in turn, further fuel political polarization. Thus, we also contribute to burgeoning literature on political polarization and its negative effects on the functioning of both political parties and overall political systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(极端的)政治两极分化和政党赞助
当代关于政党的文献已经确定了政党从公民社会向国家的逐渐但持续的转变。正如maair(《虚空的统治:西方民主的空穴》[Verso Books, 2013])所指出的那样,随着政党越来越依赖国家资源,并且只对执政感兴趣,而赞助是这种关系的基础,政党赞助的程度和模式对于理解它们的表现以及它们组织和治理的方式至关重要。在本文中,我们认为政党赞助可能是由政治竞争的性质构成的,并探讨了政治极化对赞助实践的影响,政治极化是政治竞争的一个特征,相对独立于政党制度的精确形式。我们提出了一个理论论点,系统地将不同类型的政治两极分化与不同的政党赞助模式联系起来,认为极端两极分化激励政党制定严重党派的政党赞助策略,这反过来又进一步加剧了政治两极分化。因此,我们也对政治两极分化及其对政党和整体政治制度运作的负面影响的新兴文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Political Studies
Irish Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Industry and policy in independent Ireland, 1922–1972 Industry and policy in independent Ireland, 1922–1972 , by Frank Barry, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2023, 256pp., £70.00/€83.00 (print), £58.00/€70.00 (ebook), ISBN: 0198878230 ‘It is only by political means that we can hope for … success’: Éamon de Valera’s long climb back to power, 1922–32 Obstetric violence and consent during pregnancy and childbirth: the Eighth Amendment and its impact on the Irish maternity system Mistrust: conservative rhetoric in the Oireachtas 2018 abortion debates Direct democracy and party behaviour in the Republic of Ireland: a campaign finance perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1