Improving High-Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF) System Mesoscale Snowband Forecasts with Random Forests

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Weather and Forecasting Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1175/waf-d-23-0005.1
Jacob T. Radford, G. Lackmann
{"title":"Improving High-Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF) System Mesoscale Snowband Forecasts with Random Forests","authors":"Jacob T. Radford, G. Lackmann","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0005.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMesoscale snowbands are impactful winter weather phenomena but are challenging to predict due to small scale forcings and ingredients. Previous work has established that even deterministic convection-allowing models (CAMs) often struggle to represent these features with much precision and recommended the application of ingredients-based or probabilistic forecast strategies. Based on these recommendations, we develop and evaluate four different models for forecasting snowbands. The first model, referred to as the “HREF threshold probability” model, detects band development in High-Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF) system members’1000-m simulated reflectivities, then uses these detections to calculate a snowband probability. The second model is a random forest incorporating features explicitly linked to snowbands, such as the detection of bands in each HREF member and statistical summaries of simulated reflectivity and the categorical snow field. The third model is a random forest model incorporating snowband ingredients, such as mid-tropospheric frontogenesis, moist symmetric stability, and vertical velocity. Lastly, the fourth model combines the features of the explicit and implicit random forests. Binary band predictions based upon the HREF threshold probability model resulted in a critical success index 27% higher than the average HREF member. The explicit feature random forest model further improved performance by an additional 11%, with statistics of the reflectivity field holding the most predictive value. The implicit and combined random forests slightly underperformed the explicit random forest, perhaps due to a large number of noisy, correlated features. Ultimately, we demonstrate that simple probabilistic snowband forecasting strategies can yield substantial improvements over deterministic CAMs.","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0005.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mesoscale snowbands are impactful winter weather phenomena but are challenging to predict due to small scale forcings and ingredients. Previous work has established that even deterministic convection-allowing models (CAMs) often struggle to represent these features with much precision and recommended the application of ingredients-based or probabilistic forecast strategies. Based on these recommendations, we develop and evaluate four different models for forecasting snowbands. The first model, referred to as the “HREF threshold probability” model, detects band development in High-Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF) system members’1000-m simulated reflectivities, then uses these detections to calculate a snowband probability. The second model is a random forest incorporating features explicitly linked to snowbands, such as the detection of bands in each HREF member and statistical summaries of simulated reflectivity and the categorical snow field. The third model is a random forest model incorporating snowband ingredients, such as mid-tropospheric frontogenesis, moist symmetric stability, and vertical velocity. Lastly, the fourth model combines the features of the explicit and implicit random forests. Binary band predictions based upon the HREF threshold probability model resulted in a critical success index 27% higher than the average HREF member. The explicit feature random forest model further improved performance by an additional 11%, with statistics of the reflectivity field holding the most predictive value. The implicit and combined random forests slightly underperformed the explicit random forest, perhaps due to a large number of noisy, correlated features. Ultimately, we demonstrate that simple probabilistic snowband forecasting strategies can yield substantial improvements over deterministic CAMs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用随机森林改进高分辨率集合预报(HREF)系统中尺度雪带预报
中尺度雪带是影响冬季天气的现象,但由于小尺度的作用力和成分,预测起来很有挑战性。先前的工作已经证明,即使是确定性对流允许模型(CAM)也很难精确地表示这些特征,并建议应用基于成分或概率的预测策略。基于这些建议,我们开发并评估了四种不同的雪带预测模型。第一个模型被称为“HREF阈值概率”模型,它检测高分辨率集合预测(HREF)系统成员1000米模拟反射率中的波段发展,然后使用这些检测来计算雪带概率。第二个模型是一个随机森林,包含了与雪带明确相关的特征,例如每个HREF成员中的雪带检测以及模拟反射率和分类雪场的统计摘要。第三个模型是一个随机森林模型,包含了雪带成分,如对流层中部锋生、潮湿对称稳定性和垂直速度。最后,第四个模型结合了显式和隐式随机森林的特点。基于HREF阈值概率模型的二进制带预测导致关键成功指数比HREF成员的平均值高27%。显式特征随机森林模型进一步提高了11%的性能,反射率场的统计数据具有最大的预测值。隐式和组合式随机森林的表现略逊于显式随机森林,这可能是由于大量的噪声相关特征。最终,我们证明了简单的概率雪带预测策略可以比确定性CAMs产生实质性的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Analysis Correction-based Additive Inflation on subseasonal tropical prediction in the Navy Earth System Prediction Capability Comparison of Clustering Approaches in a Multi-Model Ensemble for U.S. East Coast Cold Season Extratropical Cyclones Collaborative Exploration of Storm-Scale Probabilistic Guidance for NWS Forecast Operations Verification of the Global Forecast System, North American Mesoscale Forecast System, and High-Resolution Rapid Refresh Model Near-Surface Forecasts by use of the New York State Mesonet The influence of time varying sea-ice concentration on Antarctic and Southern Ocean numerical weather prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1