Smart city as a social transition towards inclusive development through technology: a tale of four smart cities

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Journal of Urban Sciences Pub Date : 2022-05-23 DOI:10.1080/12265934.2022.2074076
Juhyun Lee, Julia Babcock, T. Pham, T. Bui, Myunggu Kang
{"title":"Smart city as a social transition towards inclusive development through technology: a tale of four smart cities","authors":"Juhyun Lee, Julia Babcock, T. Pham, T. Bui, Myunggu Kang","doi":"10.1080/12265934.2022.2074076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Smart city initiatives have the potential to address many contemporary urban challenges, utilizing information and technology. Increasingly, smart cities are considered as social innovation processes to achieve sustainable and inclusive urban development, being influenced by broader socio-economic and institutional contexts of cities. This paper explores ‘smart city transitions’ across varied urban contexts, in particular, how smart city transitions are enacted and how they contribute to inclusive urban transformation and public value. Using a multiple case studies approach, the research investigated infrastructure planning practices in Amsterdam in the Netherlands, Seoul in Korea, Portland in the U.S. and Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) in Vietnam, cities that were known for strong efforts to establish integrated platforms to enhance societal benefits. Our analysis showed that each city has addressed its goals around sustainability, equity and affordability by reinforcing the engagement of multiple actors with the support of integrated platforms that facilitate open and multi-directional information flow in a transparent manner. In Amsterdam, innovative solutions for sustainable use of resources have been invented and distributed through multi-level social networks, contributing to the transformation into a circular economy. In Seoul and HCMC, the city's persistent efforts to utilize an open and integrated platform resulted in proactive engagement and collaboration of public and private actors in improving quality, equity and efficiency of transit services. Portland has tackled inequitable access and mistrust issues by setting principles for data governance and facilitating equity in the adoption of innovative technologies. Our research revealed that four cities established different forms of integrated platforms such as a centrally-controlled platform and a community-centred platform in order to address specific socio-economic issues within an institutional setting of each city. We concluded that building an integrated platform is not easy, but it is a critical prerequisite for the process of sustainable transformation to truly achieve smart cities across the globe.","PeriodicalId":46464,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"75 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2074076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

ABSTRACT Smart city initiatives have the potential to address many contemporary urban challenges, utilizing information and technology. Increasingly, smart cities are considered as social innovation processes to achieve sustainable and inclusive urban development, being influenced by broader socio-economic and institutional contexts of cities. This paper explores ‘smart city transitions’ across varied urban contexts, in particular, how smart city transitions are enacted and how they contribute to inclusive urban transformation and public value. Using a multiple case studies approach, the research investigated infrastructure planning practices in Amsterdam in the Netherlands, Seoul in Korea, Portland in the U.S. and Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) in Vietnam, cities that were known for strong efforts to establish integrated platforms to enhance societal benefits. Our analysis showed that each city has addressed its goals around sustainability, equity and affordability by reinforcing the engagement of multiple actors with the support of integrated platforms that facilitate open and multi-directional information flow in a transparent manner. In Amsterdam, innovative solutions for sustainable use of resources have been invented and distributed through multi-level social networks, contributing to the transformation into a circular economy. In Seoul and HCMC, the city's persistent efforts to utilize an open and integrated platform resulted in proactive engagement and collaboration of public and private actors in improving quality, equity and efficiency of transit services. Portland has tackled inequitable access and mistrust issues by setting principles for data governance and facilitating equity in the adoption of innovative technologies. Our research revealed that four cities established different forms of integrated platforms such as a centrally-controlled platform and a community-centred platform in order to address specific socio-economic issues within an institutional setting of each city. We concluded that building an integrated platform is not easy, but it is a critical prerequisite for the process of sustainable transformation to truly achieve smart cities across the globe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能城市作为一种通过技术实现包容性发展的社会转型:四个智能城市的故事
智慧城市倡议具有利用信息和技术解决许多当代城市挑战的潜力。智慧城市越来越被视为实现可持续和包容性城市发展的社会创新进程,受到城市更广泛的社会经济和制度背景的影响。本文探讨了不同城市背景下的“智慧城市转型”,特别是智慧城市转型是如何实施的,以及它们如何促进包容性城市转型和公共价值。本研究采用多案例研究方法,调查了荷兰阿姆斯特丹、韩国首尔、美国波特兰和越南胡志明市(HCMC)的基础设施规划实践,这些城市以大力建立综合平台以提高社会效益而闻名。我们的分析表明,每个城市都通过加强多方参与者的参与,在综合平台的支持下,以透明的方式促进开放和多向的信息流动,从而实现了围绕可持续性、公平性和可负担性的目标。在阿姆斯特丹,资源可持续利用的创新解决方案已经被发明出来,并通过多层次的社会网络进行传播,为向循环经济的转变做出了贡献。在首尔和胡志明市,该市坚持不懈地努力利用开放和综合的平台,促使公共和私营部门积极参与和合作,提高交通服务的质量、公平和效率。波特兰通过制定数据治理原则和促进采用创新技术的公平性,解决了不公平的访问和不信任问题。我们的研究表明,四个城市建立了不同形式的综合平台,如中央控制平台和以社区为中心的平台,以解决每个城市制度设置内的特定社会经济问题。我们的结论是,构建一个集成平台并不容易,但它是可持续转型过程中真正实现全球智慧城市的关键先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Does Airbnb raise local rent in Seoul? Spatial 2SLS model approach Replicate and generalize to make urban research coherent The effect of building height regulation in Seoul The role of cultural amenities in cities for employment growth of industrial clusters: evidence from a panel VAR model The spatial interlocking of commercial office real estate and advanced producer services: a central flow theory lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1