Book Review: Send Lazarus: Catholicism and the Crises of Neoliberalism

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Irish Theological Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1177/00211400211065650
K. Hargaden
{"title":"Book Review: Send Lazarus: Catholicism and the Crises of Neoliberalism","authors":"K. Hargaden","doi":"10.1177/00211400211065650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a book that sketches a politics of mercy, intended to open ‘a great chasm’ between the life of Christians and the brutality of the reigning ideology of our age, which the authors dub neoliberalism. Delving deep into the teachings of the last three popes, Eggemeier and Fritz make a compelling argument that the ‘inability to feel mercy’ (p. 55) for those in need—as explored in the parable from Luke 16 from which the book draws its title—is a damning state of affairs. Their proposed remedy—the works of mercy—is misunderstood if construed as simply an individual pursuit for those who feel particularly called in that direction. What they propose is the pursuit of those charitable goods ‘out of a visceral commitment to Christ’ so as to achieve ‘a recalibration of the works of mercy as structural’ (p. 159). The Introduction of the book tackles the thorniest question likely to arise among readers: What exactly is neoliberalism? Relying heavily on the work of the American political theorist, Wendy Brown, they helpfully avoid the common pitfalls around the concept. Commonly dismissed by sceptics as a meaningless term—even a slur—neoliberalism in fact names a diffuse force that has profound influence on our culture. It is hard to summarize because it is a many-tentacled beast. But all complex ideas resist simple summation. Everyone knows what democracy is, but few of us can compose a comprehensive sentence-long definition. They define neoliberalism as ‘a politicized mutation of capitalism, where the state’s primary function is to foster market processes, each person’s freedom in civil society is defined in terms of market logics of investment . . . and the needs of people and the earth are secondary to those of capital’ (p. 3). This is not short and it is not complete, but it more than addresses the objections of those who think they can dismiss the concept as being too vague to serve a useful purpose. It is worth pausing to reflect on what is included in this definition. What they are arguing is that neoliberalism has not emerged from some underground lab staffed by malicious economists. It is a political project to divert social democratic capitalisms through the deformation of the state. Where we once 1065650 ITQ0010.1177/00211400211065650Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-review2021","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"66 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Theological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400211065650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a book that sketches a politics of mercy, intended to open ‘a great chasm’ between the life of Christians and the brutality of the reigning ideology of our age, which the authors dub neoliberalism. Delving deep into the teachings of the last three popes, Eggemeier and Fritz make a compelling argument that the ‘inability to feel mercy’ (p. 55) for those in need—as explored in the parable from Luke 16 from which the book draws its title—is a damning state of affairs. Their proposed remedy—the works of mercy—is misunderstood if construed as simply an individual pursuit for those who feel particularly called in that direction. What they propose is the pursuit of those charitable goods ‘out of a visceral commitment to Christ’ so as to achieve ‘a recalibration of the works of mercy as structural’ (p. 159). The Introduction of the book tackles the thorniest question likely to arise among readers: What exactly is neoliberalism? Relying heavily on the work of the American political theorist, Wendy Brown, they helpfully avoid the common pitfalls around the concept. Commonly dismissed by sceptics as a meaningless term—even a slur—neoliberalism in fact names a diffuse force that has profound influence on our culture. It is hard to summarize because it is a many-tentacled beast. But all complex ideas resist simple summation. Everyone knows what democracy is, but few of us can compose a comprehensive sentence-long definition. They define neoliberalism as ‘a politicized mutation of capitalism, where the state’s primary function is to foster market processes, each person’s freedom in civil society is defined in terms of market logics of investment . . . and the needs of people and the earth are secondary to those of capital’ (p. 3). This is not short and it is not complete, but it more than addresses the objections of those who think they can dismiss the concept as being too vague to serve a useful purpose. It is worth pausing to reflect on what is included in this definition. What they are arguing is that neoliberalism has not emerged from some underground lab staffed by malicious economists. It is a political project to divert social democratic capitalisms through the deformation of the state. Where we once 1065650 ITQ0010.1177/00211400211065650Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-review2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《送拉撒路:天主教与新自由主义的危机》
这本书描绘了一种仁慈的政治,旨在打开基督徒的生活与我们这个时代统治意识形态的残酷之间的“巨大鸿沟”,作者称之为新自由主义。Eggemeier和Fritz深入研究了最后三位教皇的教义,提出了一个令人信服的论点,即“无法为那些需要帮助的人感到怜悯”(第55页)——正如本书标题取自《路加福音》第16章的寓言中所探讨的那样——是一种该死的状态。如果将他们提出的补救措施——仁慈之作——简单地解释为对那些感到特别需要帮助的人的个人追求,就会被误解。他们提出的是“出于对基督发自内心的承诺”追求这些慈善物品,以实现“将仁慈的作品重新调整为结构性的”(第159页)。这本书的引言解决了读者中可能出现的最棘手的问题:新自由主义到底是什么?在很大程度上依赖于美国政治理论家温迪·布朗的工作,他们帮助避免了这个概念的常见陷阱。新自由主义通常被怀疑论者视为一个毫无意义的术语,甚至是一种侮辱,它实际上命名了一种对我们的文化有深远影响的分散力量。这很难概括,因为它是一种多触角的野兽。但所有复杂的想法都抗拒简单的总结。每个人都知道什么是民主,但我们中很少有人能写出一句完整的长句。他们将新自由主义定义为“资本主义的政治化突变,国家的主要职能是促进市场进程,公民社会中每个人的自由都是根据投资的市场逻辑来定义的……”。人和地球的需要是次要于资本的需要(第3页)。这并不简短,也不完整,但它不仅解决了那些认为这个概念过于模糊而无法达到有用目的的人的反对意见。值得停下来思考一下这个定义中包含了什么。他们所争论的是,新自由主义并不是从一些由恶意经济学家组成的地下实验室中产生的。这是一个通过国家变形来转移社会民主资本主义的政治项目。我们曾经在哪里1065650 ITQ0010.1177/02111400211065650爱尔兰神学四分之一书评2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Interpreting Mk 5: 25–34 in Solidarity with Women Who Have Experienced Pregnancy Loss Marrying Body and Theology: A Response to Thomas Finegan Book Review: Journeys of the Mind: A Life in History Is Pope Francis’s Social Teaching Post-Cardijn? The Judgment of the Nations: Structural Sin, Social Ontology, and Social Eschatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1