Health workers' and hospital administrators' perspectives on mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth: a multicenter qualitative study in Ghana.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI:10.1186/s12978-022-01372-3
Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Evelyn Tamma, Ernest Maya, Joshua P Vogel, Özge Tunçalp, Meghan A Bohren
{"title":"Health workers' and hospital administrators' perspectives on mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth: a multicenter qualitative study in Ghana.","authors":"Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Evelyn Tamma, Ernest Maya, Joshua P Vogel, Özge Tunçalp, Meghan A Bohren","doi":"10.1186/s12978-022-01372-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth continues to impact negatively on the quality of maternal healthcare provision and utilization. The views of health workers are vital in achieving comprehensive understanding of mistreatment of women, and to design evidence-based interventions to prevent it. We explored the perspectives of health workers and hospital administrators on mistreatment of women during childbirth to identify opportunity for improvement in the quality of maternal care in health facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study comprising in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 24 health workers and hospital administrators was conducted in two major towns (Koforidua and Nsawam) in the Eastern region of Ghana. The study was part of a formative mixed-methods project to develop an evidence-based definition, identification criteria and two tools for measuring mistreatment of women in facilities during childbirth. Data analysis was undertaken based on thematic content via the inductive analytic framework approach, using Nvivo version 12.6.0.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Health workers and hospital administrators reported mixed feelings regarding the quality of care women receive. Almost all respondents were aware of mistreatment occurring during childbirth, describing physical and verbal abuse and denial of preferred birthing positions and companionship. Rationalizations for mistreatment included limited staff capacity, high workload, perceptions of women's non-compliance and their attitudes towards staff. Health workers had mixed responses regarding the acceptability of mistreatment of women, although most argued against it. Increasing staff strength, number of health facilities, refresher training for health workers and adequate education of women about pregnancy and childbirth were suggestions to minimize such mistreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health workers indicated that some women are mistreated during birth in the study sites and provided various rationalizations for why this occurred. There is urgent need to motivate, retrain or otherwise encourage health workers to prevent mistreatment of women and promote respectful maternity care. Further research on implementation of evidence-based interventions could help mitigate mistreatment of women in health facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01372-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth continues to impact negatively on the quality of maternal healthcare provision and utilization. The views of health workers are vital in achieving comprehensive understanding of mistreatment of women, and to design evidence-based interventions to prevent it. We explored the perspectives of health workers and hospital administrators on mistreatment of women during childbirth to identify opportunity for improvement in the quality of maternal care in health facilities.

Methods: A qualitative study comprising in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 24 health workers and hospital administrators was conducted in two major towns (Koforidua and Nsawam) in the Eastern region of Ghana. The study was part of a formative mixed-methods project to develop an evidence-based definition, identification criteria and two tools for measuring mistreatment of women in facilities during childbirth. Data analysis was undertaken based on thematic content via the inductive analytic framework approach, using Nvivo version 12.6.0.

Result: Health workers and hospital administrators reported mixed feelings regarding the quality of care women receive. Almost all respondents were aware of mistreatment occurring during childbirth, describing physical and verbal abuse and denial of preferred birthing positions and companionship. Rationalizations for mistreatment included limited staff capacity, high workload, perceptions of women's non-compliance and their attitudes towards staff. Health workers had mixed responses regarding the acceptability of mistreatment of women, although most argued against it. Increasing staff strength, number of health facilities, refresher training for health workers and adequate education of women about pregnancy and childbirth were suggestions to minimize such mistreatment.

Conclusion: Health workers indicated that some women are mistreated during birth in the study sites and provided various rationalizations for why this occurred. There is urgent need to motivate, retrain or otherwise encourage health workers to prevent mistreatment of women and promote respectful maternity care. Further research on implementation of evidence-based interventions could help mitigate mistreatment of women in health facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生工作者和医院管理人员对设施分娩期间虐待妇女的看法:加纳的一项多中心定性研究
背景:在全球范围内,在设施分娩期间对妇女的虐待继续对孕产妇保健提供和利用的质量产生负面影响。卫生工作者的意见对于全面了解对妇女的虐待以及设计以证据为基础的干预措施来预防这种虐待至关重要。我们探讨了卫生工作者和医院管理人员对分娩期间虐待妇女的看法,以确定改善卫生机构孕产妇保健质量的机会。方法:在加纳东部地区的两个主要城镇(科福里杜瓦和恩萨瓦姆)对24名卫生工作者和医院管理人员进行了深入访谈(IDIs)的定性研究。该研究是一个形成性混合方法项目的一部分,该项目旨在制定基于证据的定义、识别标准和两种工具,以衡量设施中分娩期间妇女受到的虐待。数据分析基于专题内容,采用归纳分析框架方法,使用Nvivo 12.6.0版本。结果:卫生工作者和医院管理人员报告了对妇女接受的护理质量的复杂感受。几乎所有的受访者都意识到在分娩过程中发生的虐待,描述了身体和语言上的虐待,以及拒绝选择分娩姿势和陪伴。虐待的理由包括工作人员能力有限、工作量大、对妇女不遵守规定的看法及其对工作人员的态度。保健工作者对是否可以接受虐待妇女的问题反应不一,尽管大多数人反对这种做法。增加工作人员、增加保健设施的数量、对保健工作人员进行进修培训以及对妇女进行关于怀孕和分娩的充分教育,都是尽量减少这种虐待的建议。结论:卫生工作者指出,在研究地点,一些妇女在分娩时受到虐待,并为这种情况发生的原因提供了各种理由。迫切需要激励、再培训或以其他方式鼓励保健工作者防止虐待妇女和促进尊重产妇护理。进一步研究以证据为基础的干预措施的实施情况,有助于减轻卫生设施中对妇女的虐待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of woman- centered care among Iranian midwives and women: a qualitative study. Exploring the lived socioeconomic experiences of teen mothers in Rwanda. Effect of eHealth intervention (ADHERE) on adherence to partograph and WHO safe childbirth checklist in intrapartum care: implementation research in Ethiopia. Pandemic lessons: protecting sexual and reproductive health during global health emergencies. "My heart was in my stomach": Texas-based obstetricians' and gynecologists' experiences post anti-abortion legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1