{"title":"The Shimmer in the Twilight: Walter Lippmann’s Public Opinion and the Journalist’s Way of Knowledge","authors":"Ronald P. Seyb","doi":"10.1080/00947679.2022.2048554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the final section of Public Opinion, Walter Lippmann urges journalists to enlist help from scientists and social scientists to provide the public with “a picture of reality on which [they] can act.” Lippmann, however, acknowledges that there are matters of public concern that are not susceptible to the measuring, quantifying, and recording integral to scientific and social scientific inquiry, matters that oblige journalists “to occupy the position of an umpire in the unscored baseball game.” Lippmann did not tell journalists how to illuminate this “twilight zone” of news. This article argues that the political scientist James Scott’s discussion in his classic work Seeing Like a State of the value of “metis” for understanding one’s environment complements Lippmann’s work by highlighting practical knowledge’s value for navigating a world in which science’s “explanatory virtues” can obscure phenomena that cannot be measured but, nonetheless, journalists must describe and interpret in a republic.","PeriodicalId":38759,"journal":{"name":"Journalism history","volume":"48 1","pages":"157 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.2022.2048554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT In the final section of Public Opinion, Walter Lippmann urges journalists to enlist help from scientists and social scientists to provide the public with “a picture of reality on which [they] can act.” Lippmann, however, acknowledges that there are matters of public concern that are not susceptible to the measuring, quantifying, and recording integral to scientific and social scientific inquiry, matters that oblige journalists “to occupy the position of an umpire in the unscored baseball game.” Lippmann did not tell journalists how to illuminate this “twilight zone” of news. This article argues that the political scientist James Scott’s discussion in his classic work Seeing Like a State of the value of “metis” for understanding one’s environment complements Lippmann’s work by highlighting practical knowledge’s value for navigating a world in which science’s “explanatory virtues” can obscure phenomena that cannot be measured but, nonetheless, journalists must describe and interpret in a republic.
在《公众舆论》的最后一部分,Walter Lippmann敦促记者寻求科学家和社会科学家的帮助,为公众提供“一幅他们可以据此采取行动的现实图景”。然而,李普曼承认,有些公众关注的问题是无法对科学和社会科学调查必不可少的测量、量化和记录的,这些问题迫使记者“在未得分的棒球比赛中扮演裁判的角色”。李普曼没有告诉记者如何阐明新闻的“模糊地带”。本文认为,政治学家詹姆斯·斯科特(James Scott)在他的经典著作《像一个国家一样看待“梅蒂斯”对理解一个人的环境的价值》(Seeing Like a State)中的讨论,与李普曼的著作相辅相成,他强调了实用知识在导航一个世界中的价值,在这个世界中,科学的“解释性美德”可以模糊那些无法测量的现象,但记者必须在一个共和国中描述和解释这些现象。