Cultivating Digital Reflexivity as Resistance to Digital Dualism: Doing Digital Ethnography with U.S. Congregations During the covid-19 Pandemic

Q2 Arts and Humanities Ecclesial Practices Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1163/22144417-bja10045
Erin Raffety
{"title":"Cultivating Digital Reflexivity as Resistance to Digital Dualism: Doing Digital Ethnography with U.S. Congregations During the covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Erin Raffety","doi":"10.1163/22144417-bja10045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article reflexively reviews methods for training researchers developed during a national studying of thriving congregations in the United States during the covid-19 pandemic (2020-2022) as a case study on doing digital ethnography (ethnography that uses digital methods to study and engage critically with digital culture). The article outlines the importance of digital culture (expressions of identity offline are not separate from online formation; see Campbell 2012) and digital dualism (outmoded assumptions about binaries between online/offline spaces; see Jurgenson 2011) for doing digital ethnography, and argues that as long as digital dualism lurks not only among congregations, but also within researchers and their methodologies, it undermines knowledge of congregations. Therefore, the article develops the concept of digital reflexivity (the interrogation of one’s own digital cultural experiences, identities, and power, in tension with one’s relationships), arguing for its usefulness for ethnographic studies of congregations, practices of congregational ministry, and theological education.","PeriodicalId":37169,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesial Practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesial Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22144417-bja10045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reflexively reviews methods for training researchers developed during a national studying of thriving congregations in the United States during the covid-19 pandemic (2020-2022) as a case study on doing digital ethnography (ethnography that uses digital methods to study and engage critically with digital culture). The article outlines the importance of digital culture (expressions of identity offline are not separate from online formation; see Campbell 2012) and digital dualism (outmoded assumptions about binaries between online/offline spaces; see Jurgenson 2011) for doing digital ethnography, and argues that as long as digital dualism lurks not only among congregations, but also within researchers and their methodologies, it undermines knowledge of congregations. Therefore, the article develops the concept of digital reflexivity (the interrogation of one’s own digital cultural experiences, identities, and power, in tension with one’s relationships), arguing for its usefulness for ethnographic studies of congregations, practices of congregational ministry, and theological education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养数字自反性作为对数字二重性的抵抗:在新冠肺炎大流行期间与美国集会进行数字民族志
这篇文章反射性地回顾了在新冠肺炎大流行期间(2020-2022年)对美国蓬勃发展的集会进行全国研究期间开发的培训研究人员的方法,作为数字民族志(使用数字方法研究和批判性地参与数字文化的民族志)的案例研究。这篇文章概述了数字文化(线下身份表达与在线形成并不分离;见Campbell 2012)和数字二元论(关于线上/线下空间二元性的过时假设;见Jurgenson 2011)对数字民族志的重要性,并认为只要数字二元论不仅潜伏在会众中,但在研究人员及其方法论中,它也破坏了对会众的了解。因此,本文发展了数字自反性的概念(在与人的关系紧张的情况下,对自己的数字文化体验、身份和权力的审问),认为它对会众的民族志研究、会众事工的实践和神学教育有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecclesial Practices
Ecclesial Practices Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Is Qualitative Research the Best or Only Way to Study Lived Theology? ‘Give the Grant Money to the Youth’: From Youth Departure to Belonging in the Ethnic Church Practicing Reflexivity at the American Academy of Religion Qualitative Research in Theology. A Spiritual Turn? Ethno-Apophasis: An Ethnographic Theology of Thinness and Refusal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1