The Evaluation and the Accreditation Process of Greek HEIs with an Emphasis on Primary Education Departments

Q4 Social Sciences Athens Journal of Education Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.30958/aje.10-1-10
G. Papanikos
{"title":"The Evaluation and the Accreditation Process of Greek HEIs with an Emphasis on Primary Education Departments","authors":"G. Papanikos","doi":"10.30958/aje.10-1-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the quality evaluations of the Greek Universities highlighting those which offer a full-fledged study program of primary education. There are eight principles-criteria according to which each university is evaluated. For each principle, scores may range from 1 (noncompliance with the principle) to 4 (fully compliance). I present and compare results of the Greek university evaluations completed by the Hellenic Quality Assurance and Accreditation Agency (HQA). Surprisingly, no university has been graded as non-compliant in any of the eight principles-criteria. These evaluations are performed by an alleged “external” and “independent” committee. For all practical purposes, they are, nevertheless, based on subjective and biased opinions of academics affiliated with international universities with links to Greece and its universities. Independent and evidence-based evaluations paint a different picture. Universities which get perfect scores in the quality evaluation processes perform badly in the pertinent international ranking systems. As a case study, their primary education departments have lower research performance with high variability between faculty members and departments. Given that one criterion of evaluating quality is research, then not all Greek universities can be evaluated as highly performing research institutions, either in absolute or relevant terms. This criterion of quality is not satisfied by the primary education departments of Greek universities. According to this evidence, using the HQA as an agency to assess and accredit quality is useless. It should be abolished. A new system should be based on objective criteria such as independent teaching evaluations and research performance. These do not require any committee to evaluate performance and can be constructed on evidence-based policy. The latter relies solely on rigorously established objective facts. Keywords: higher education, quality assurance, HQA, teaching quality, Greece","PeriodicalId":36453,"journal":{"name":"Athens Journal of Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-1-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the quality evaluations of the Greek Universities highlighting those which offer a full-fledged study program of primary education. There are eight principles-criteria according to which each university is evaluated. For each principle, scores may range from 1 (noncompliance with the principle) to 4 (fully compliance). I present and compare results of the Greek university evaluations completed by the Hellenic Quality Assurance and Accreditation Agency (HQA). Surprisingly, no university has been graded as non-compliant in any of the eight principles-criteria. These evaluations are performed by an alleged “external” and “independent” committee. For all practical purposes, they are, nevertheless, based on subjective and biased opinions of academics affiliated with international universities with links to Greece and its universities. Independent and evidence-based evaluations paint a different picture. Universities which get perfect scores in the quality evaluation processes perform badly in the pertinent international ranking systems. As a case study, their primary education departments have lower research performance with high variability between faculty members and departments. Given that one criterion of evaluating quality is research, then not all Greek universities can be evaluated as highly performing research institutions, either in absolute or relevant terms. This criterion of quality is not satisfied by the primary education departments of Greek universities. According to this evidence, using the HQA as an agency to assess and accredit quality is useless. It should be abolished. A new system should be based on objective criteria such as independent teaching evaluations and research performance. These do not require any committee to evaluate performance and can be constructed on evidence-based policy. The latter relies solely on rigorously established objective facts. Keywords: higher education, quality assurance, HQA, teaching quality, Greece
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊高等教育机构的评估和认证过程,重点是小学教育部门
本文考察了希腊大学的质量评估,重点是那些提供全面初等教育学习计划的大学。评估每一所大学的标准有八项原则。对于每项原则,分数可能在1(不遵守原则)到4(完全遵守原则)之间。我介绍并比较了希腊质量保证和认证机构(HQA)完成的希腊大学评估结果。令人惊讶的是,没有一所大学被评为不符合八项原则中的任何一项。这些评估是由一个所谓的“外部”和“独立”委员会进行的。然而,出于所有实际目的,它们都是基于与希腊及其大学有联系的国际大学附属学者的主观和有偏见的意见。独立和循证评估描绘了一幅不同的画面。在质量评估过程中获得满分的大学在相关的国际排名系统中表现不佳。作为一个案例研究,他们的小学教育部门的研究成绩较低,教师和部门之间的差异很大。考虑到评估质量的一个标准是研究,那么并不是所有希腊大学都可以被评估为表现出色的研究机构,无论是绝对的还是相关的。希腊大学的初等教育部门并不满足这一质量标准。根据这些证据,使用总部作为评估和认证质量的机构是无用的。它应该被废除。一个新的系统应该建立在客观标准的基础上,如独立的教学评估和研究表现。这些不需要任何委员会评估绩效,可以基于循证政策构建。后者完全依赖于严格确立的客观事实。关键词:高等教育,质量保证,HQA,教学质量,希腊
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Athens Journal of Education
Athens Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering Students' Active Participation in Higher Education: The Role of Teacher-student Rapport Metacognitive Strategies and Tendency to be Open to Learning: A Predictive Study Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Potential Impact on the Future of Higher Education COVID-19 Global Pandemic Upheaval: CTE Teachers Response in the United States Supporting Distributed Learning through Immersive Learning Environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1