Rod Whiteley, Jack T Hickey, Robin Vermeulen, Ryan Timmins, Thomas M Best, Ebonie Rio, David Opar
{"title":"Biceps Femoris Fascicle Lengths Increase after Hamstring Injury Rehabilitation to a Greater Extent in the Injured Leg.","authors":"Rod Whiteley, Jack T Hickey, Robin Vermeulen, Ryan Timmins, Thomas M Best, Ebonie Rio, David Opar","doi":"10.1155/2022/5131914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Document changes in fascicle length during rehabilitation from hamstring injury of the injured and uninjured legs and secondarily to describe any association between these changes and reinjury rate.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two prospectively included hamstring injured athletes had their biceps femoris long head fascicle lengths measured at the start and end of rehabilitation using two-dimensional ultrasound. Absolute and relative changes in fascicle length were compared for each leg using linear mixed models. Participants were followed for six months after being cleared to return to sport for any reinjury. Fascicle lengths and rehabilitation duration were compared for those who reinjured and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Injured leg fascicle length was shorter at the start of rehabilitation (9.1 cm compared to 9.8 cm, <i>p</i> < 0.01 ) but underwent greater absolute and relative lengthening during rehabilitation to 11.1 cm (18% increase) compared to 10.2 cm (8% increase, <i>p</i> < 0.01 ) for the uninjured leg. There were no significant differences in any fascicle length parameter for the 5 participants who reinjured in the 6 months following their return to sport compared to those that did not reinjure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While both injured and uninjured legs displayed increases in fascicle length during rehabilitation, the larger fascicle length increases in the injured leg suggest that either a different training stimulus was applied during rehabilitation to each leg or there was a different response to training and/or recovery from injury in the injured leg. Reinjury risk appears to be independent of fascicle length changes in this cohort, but the small number of reinjuries makes any conclusions speculative.</p>","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5131914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Document changes in fascicle length during rehabilitation from hamstring injury of the injured and uninjured legs and secondarily to describe any association between these changes and reinjury rate.
Design: Multicentre case series.
Methods: Fifty-two prospectively included hamstring injured athletes had their biceps femoris long head fascicle lengths measured at the start and end of rehabilitation using two-dimensional ultrasound. Absolute and relative changes in fascicle length were compared for each leg using linear mixed models. Participants were followed for six months after being cleared to return to sport for any reinjury. Fascicle lengths and rehabilitation duration were compared for those who reinjured and those who did not.
Results: Injured leg fascicle length was shorter at the start of rehabilitation (9.1 cm compared to 9.8 cm, p < 0.01 ) but underwent greater absolute and relative lengthening during rehabilitation to 11.1 cm (18% increase) compared to 10.2 cm (8% increase, p < 0.01 ) for the uninjured leg. There were no significant differences in any fascicle length parameter for the 5 participants who reinjured in the 6 months following their return to sport compared to those that did not reinjure.
Conclusions: While both injured and uninjured legs displayed increases in fascicle length during rehabilitation, the larger fascicle length increases in the injured leg suggest that either a different training stimulus was applied during rehabilitation to each leg or there was a different response to training and/or recovery from injury in the injured leg. Reinjury risk appears to be independent of fascicle length changes in this cohort, but the small number of reinjuries makes any conclusions speculative.
目标。记录受伤和未受伤腿腘绳肌损伤康复期间肌束长度的变化,其次描述这些变化与再损伤率之间的关系。设计。多中心病例系列。方法。在康复开始和结束时,使用二维超声测量了52名前瞻性腘绳肌损伤运动员的股二头肌长头束长度。使用线性混合模型比较每条腿肌束长度的绝对和相对变化。参与者在被允许重返赛场后进行了为期6个月的随访,以防再次受伤。比较了损伤组和未损伤组的神经束长度和康复时间。结果。损伤腿肌束长度在康复开始时较短(9.1 cm比9.8 cm, p < 0.01),但在康复期间绝对和相对延长至11.1 cm(增加18%),而未损伤腿肌束长度为10.2 cm(增加8%,p < 0.01)。在恢复运动后6个月内再次受伤的5名参与者与未再次受伤的参与者相比,任何肌束长度参数均无显著差异。结论。虽然受伤和未受伤的腿在康复过程中都表现出筋束长度的增加,但受伤腿的筋束长度增加较大,这表明在康复过程中,每条腿使用了不同的训练刺激,或者受伤腿对训练和/或损伤恢复有不同的反应。在这个队列中,再损伤的风险似乎与肌束长度的变化无关,但再损伤的数量很少,这使得任何结论都是推测性的。