Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016: A technical-tactical analysis of judo matches

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Kinesiology Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI:10.26582/K.50.2.7
R. Kons, J. N. N. S. Junior, Gabriela Fischer, D. Detanico
{"title":"Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016: A technical-tactical analysis of judo matches","authors":"R. Kons, J. N. N. S. Junior, Gabriela Fischer, D. Detanico","doi":"10.26582/K.50.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to compare the athletes’ scores, penalties and efficiency between of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016, and identify which variable determines the winner of the matches. A total of 608 matches in the Olympic and Paralympic Games were analysed. Total relative scores (ippon, wazari and yuko), penalties (shido per match) and efficiency were identified in the categories male and female, Olympic and Paralympic Games, and medallists and non-medallists.  The main results showed that the wazari was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) than in the Paralympic Games (male team); the ippon was higher in the Paralympic Games (p = 0.05) and the shido was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) (female team). The male Olympic medallists were more efficient (p = 0.01), while the female Paralympic medallists were less punished (p = 0.01). The ippon was the key variable that determined winning in both Olympic and Paralympic matches (p < 0.001). We concluded that male Olympic athletes showed greater efficiency and scores than Paralympians, while the female team presented more scores and fewer penalties. The ippon was the key point that determined victory in most of the matches.","PeriodicalId":49943,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology","volume":"50 1","pages":"204-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.26582/K.50.2.7","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26582/K.50.2.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the athletes’ scores, penalties and efficiency between of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016, and identify which variable determines the winner of the matches. A total of 608 matches in the Olympic and Paralympic Games were analysed. Total relative scores (ippon, wazari and yuko), penalties (shido per match) and efficiency were identified in the categories male and female, Olympic and Paralympic Games, and medallists and non-medallists.  The main results showed that the wazari was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) than in the Paralympic Games (male team); the ippon was higher in the Paralympic Games (p = 0.05) and the shido was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) (female team). The male Olympic medallists were more efficient (p = 0.01), while the female Paralympic medallists were less punished (p = 0.01). The ippon was the key variable that determined winning in both Olympic and Paralympic matches (p < 0.001). We concluded that male Olympic athletes showed greater efficiency and scores than Paralympians, while the female team presented more scores and fewer penalties. The ippon was the key point that determined victory in most of the matches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016年奥运会和残奥会:柔道比赛技战术分析
本研究的目的是比较2016年里约奥运会和残奥会运动员的得分、点球和效率,并确定哪个变量决定比赛的获胜者。对奥运会和残奥会的608场比赛进行了分析。在男子和女子、奥运会和残奥会、奖牌获得者和非奖牌获得者类别中确定了相对总分(ippon、wazari和yuko)、点球(每场比赛的shido)和效率。主要结果显示,奥运会的瓦扎里比残奥会(男队)高(p=0.05);ippon在残奥会中较高(p=0.05),shido在奥运会中较高(p=0.05)(女队)。奥运会男性奖牌获得者的效率更高(p=0.01),而残奥会女性奖牌获得者受到的惩罚更少(p=01)。ippon是决定奥运会和残奥会比赛获胜的关键变量(p<0.001)。我们得出结论,奥运会男性运动员比残奥会运动员表现出更高的效率和分数,而女队则表现出更多的分数和更少的处罚。ippon是决定大多数比赛胜利的关键点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kinesiology
Kinesiology REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Kinesiology – International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology (print ISSN 1331- 1441, online ISSN 1848-638X) publishes twice a year scientific papers and other written material from kinesiology (a scientific discipline which investigates art and science of human movement; in the meaning and scope close to the idiom “sport sciences”) and other adjacent human sciences focused on sport and exercise, primarily from anthropology (biological and cultural alike), medicine, sociology, psychology, natural sciences and mathematics applied to sport in its broadest sense, history, and others. Contributions of high scientific interest, including also results of theoretical analyses and their practical application in physical education, sport, physical recreation and kinesitherapy, are accepted for publication. The following sections define the scope of the journal: Sport and sports activities, Physical education, Recreation/leisure, Kinesiological anthropology, Training methods, Biology of sport and exercise, Sports medicine and physiology of sport, Biomechanics, History of sport and Book reviews with news.
期刊最新文献
Gender and limb effects on adult normative data for the Biodex Balance System Metabolic response during high-intensity interval exercise and resting vascular and mitochondrial function in CrossFit participants Is sport and exercise participation related to the environmental and policy factors of physical activity in Croatia? Analysis of training load and performance in designing smart bodyweight power training Effects of a mobility and dynamic strength intervention program on the range of motion, strength, and strength asymmetry in people with neck or low back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1