Innovation policy instruments for grand challenges: targeting constellations of diverse R&I actors?

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Industry and Innovation Pub Date : 2022-10-06 DOI:10.1080/13662716.2022.2112397
David Howoldt, S. Borrás
{"title":"Innovation policy instruments for grand challenges: targeting constellations of diverse R&I actors?","authors":"David Howoldt, S. Borrás","doi":"10.1080/13662716.2022.2112397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many countries have created research and innovation (R&I) policy instruments with the mission of addressing grand challenges. The new policy rationale suggests that these instruments must target civil society actors in new and more diverse constellations, combining them with ‘traditional’ R&I actors (universities and firms). Investigating the extent to which policy instruments are designed according to this requirement, this paper analyses co-occurrences of targeted R&I actors in science, technology and innovation policy instruments and identifies five typical constellations of targeted R&I actors. We focus on two constellations that are likely to include civil society actors. Wide constellations (dominated by universities and firms) are positively associated with grand challenge policy instruments. Civil-society-led constellations are less heterogeneous and possibly associated with grand challenge instruments. This original contribution shows partial consistency between the grand challenge policy rationale and its instruments, and evidence of civil-society-led actor constellations not yet considered in the literature.","PeriodicalId":13585,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Innovation","volume":"30 1","pages":"985 - 1007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2112397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many countries have created research and innovation (R&I) policy instruments with the mission of addressing grand challenges. The new policy rationale suggests that these instruments must target civil society actors in new and more diverse constellations, combining them with ‘traditional’ R&I actors (universities and firms). Investigating the extent to which policy instruments are designed according to this requirement, this paper analyses co-occurrences of targeted R&I actors in science, technology and innovation policy instruments and identifies five typical constellations of targeted R&I actors. We focus on two constellations that are likely to include civil society actors. Wide constellations (dominated by universities and firms) are positively associated with grand challenge policy instruments. Civil-society-led constellations are less heterogeneous and possibly associated with grand challenge instruments. This original contribution shows partial consistency between the grand challenge policy rationale and its instruments, and evidence of civil-society-led actor constellations not yet considered in the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对重大挑战的创新政策工具:针对不同研发参与者?
摘要许多国家制定了研究与创新政策工具,其使命是应对重大挑战。新的政策理由表明,这些文书必须针对新的、更加多样化的群体中的民间社会行为者,将他们与“传统”的R&I行为者(大学和公司)相结合。通过调查政策工具在多大程度上是根据这一要求设计的,本文分析了科学、技术和创新政策工具中目标研发参与者的共同出现,并确定了五个典型的目标研发参与者群体。我们重点关注可能包括民间社会行动者的两个星座。广泛的星座(由大学和公司主导)与重大挑战政策工具呈正相关。民间社会主导的星座不那么异质,可能与重大挑战工具有关。这一原始贡献表明,大挑战政策的基本原理及其工具与文献中尚未考虑的民间社会主导的行动者群体之间存在部分一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Industry and Innovation is an international refereed journal presenting high-quality original scholarship of the dynamics of industries and innovation. Interdisciplinary in nature, Industry and Innovation is informed by, and contributes in turn to, advancing the theoretical frontier within economics, organization theory, and economic geography. Theoretical issues encompass: •What are the institutional underpinnings for different organizational forms? •How are different industrial structures and institutions related to innovation patterns and economic performance?
期刊最新文献
Exploring the nexus of organisational culture and sustainability for green innovation The emergence of new regional technological specialisations: exploring the role of organisations and their technological network structure Partnering with green start-ups: a vehicle for eco-innovation? R&D policy instrument mix sequencing: evaluating the impact of receiving R&D grants and R&D tax credits over time on firm-level R&D Firms’ patenting and collective cumulative knowledge: evidence from the largest R&D investors in the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1