Rivalry Between the Taliban and ISKP: The Collision of Terror

Saman Ayesha Kidwai
{"title":"Rivalry Between the Taliban and ISKP: The Collision of Terror","authors":"Saman Ayesha Kidwai","doi":"10.1177/09749284221127791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, Afghanistan finds itself in the cross hairs of a security vacuum and a near-failed state, where the increasing radicalisation of its populace appears to be an inevitable reality. Despite the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001 by the allied forces, it was able to resurge as a powerful non-state actor from 2006 onwards, under the leadership of Mullah Omar. However, that failed to prevent the emergence of other terrorist groups, like the Islamic State—Khorasan Province (ISKP), whose formation in 2015 heralded the beginning of the ongoing rivalry between the two organisations. Even though tracing their origin to terrorist outfits such as the Afghan Taliban and Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), ISKP terrorists who formed the Khorasan branch of Islamic State (ISIS) consider the Hanafi-based organisations not ‘extremist enough’. Furthermore, the ISKP leaders denigrate the Taliban for their ethno-nationalist ambitions that fail to align with its pan-Islamic and extremist version of Salafist Islam. The ideological conflict, reinforced by resource-based competition and dynamics introduced by other jihadist groups such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) and TTP, and the state actors like Pakistan, will continue to worsen the geostrategic and humanitarian crises unfolding in the country, with broad regional implications.","PeriodicalId":81509,"journal":{"name":"India quarterly","volume":"78 1","pages":"544 - 557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284221127791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, Afghanistan finds itself in the cross hairs of a security vacuum and a near-failed state, where the increasing radicalisation of its populace appears to be an inevitable reality. Despite the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001 by the allied forces, it was able to resurge as a powerful non-state actor from 2006 onwards, under the leadership of Mullah Omar. However, that failed to prevent the emergence of other terrorist groups, like the Islamic State—Khorasan Province (ISKP), whose formation in 2015 heralded the beginning of the ongoing rivalry between the two organisations. Even though tracing their origin to terrorist outfits such as the Afghan Taliban and Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), ISKP terrorists who formed the Khorasan branch of Islamic State (ISIS) consider the Hanafi-based organisations not ‘extremist enough’. Furthermore, the ISKP leaders denigrate the Taliban for their ethno-nationalist ambitions that fail to align with its pan-Islamic and extremist version of Salafist Islam. The ideological conflict, reinforced by resource-based competition and dynamics introduced by other jihadist groups such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) and TTP, and the state actors like Pakistan, will continue to worsen the geostrategic and humanitarian crises unfolding in the country, with broad regional implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔利班与伊斯兰圣战组织的竞争:恐怖冲突
如今,阿富汗发现自己处于安全真空和近乎失败的国家的十字路口,其民众日益激进化似乎是不可避免的现实。尽管塔利班在2001年被盟军推翻,但从2006年起,在毛拉·奥马尔的领导下,它得以重新成为一个强大的非国家行为者。然而,这并没有阻止其他恐怖组织的出现,比如伊斯兰国呼罗珊省,该组织于2015年成立,预示着这两个组织之间持续竞争的开始。尽管他们的起源可以追溯到阿富汗塔利班和巴基斯坦塔利班(TTP)等恐怖组织,但组成伊斯兰国呼罗珊分支的伊斯兰圣战组织恐怖分子认为,以哈纳菲为基地的组织“不够极端”。此外,ISKP领导人诋毁塔利班的种族民族主义野心,因为他们的野心与其泛伊斯兰和极端主义版本的萨拉菲派伊斯兰教不一致。意识形态冲突,加上东突厥斯坦伊斯兰运动(ETIM)和TTP等其他圣战组织以及巴基斯坦等国家行为者引入的基于资源的竞争和动态,将继续恶化该国正在发生的地缘战略和人道主义危机,并产生广泛的地区影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visa-on-arrival, ECOWAS-free Mobility and the Securitisation of the Intra-African Migration in Nigeria Book review: Mustafa Suleyman and Michael Bhaskar, The Coming Wave: AI, Power and the Twenty-first Century’s Greatest Dilemma Navigating East: Exploring Northeast India’s Perspective on the Look (Act) East Policy Golden Triangle Amphetamines in India: The Indo-Bangladesh Border as an Alternative to the North-East Corridor Book review: Suranjan Das and Anita Sengupta (Eds.), Contiguity, Connectivity and Access: The Importance of the Bay of Bengal Region in Indian Foreign Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1