The Usefulness of Interactive Governance for Underground Planning

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Nature + Culture Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.3167/NC.2019.140203
Ehsan Nouzari, T. Hartmann, T. Spit
{"title":"The Usefulness of Interactive Governance for Underground Planning","authors":"Ehsan Nouzari, T. Hartmann, T. Spit","doi":"10.3167/NC.2019.140203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The underground provides many spatial planning opportunities as it offers space for structures, but also functions as a resource for energy. To guide developments and use the capabilities the underground provides, the Dutch national government started a policy process for the Structuurvisie Ondergrond (a master plan). Stakeholders are involved in the policy process because of the many interests linked to underground functions. However, past policy processes related to the underground dealt with lack of stakeholder satisfaction. This article explores a quantitative approach by focusing on (a) statistical testing of four criteria of interactive governance and (b) using said criteria to evaluate the satisfaction of stakeholders in a policy process. This article highlights the usefulness of a more quantitative approach and provides new insights into the relation between interactive governance and the procedural satisfaction of stakeholders. It also provides insights that help to improve interactive governance in terms of process management to achieve greater procedural satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":46069,"journal":{"name":"Nature + Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/NC.2019.140203","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature + Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/NC.2019.140203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The underground provides many spatial planning opportunities as it offers space for structures, but also functions as a resource for energy. To guide developments and use the capabilities the underground provides, the Dutch national government started a policy process for the Structuurvisie Ondergrond (a master plan). Stakeholders are involved in the policy process because of the many interests linked to underground functions. However, past policy processes related to the underground dealt with lack of stakeholder satisfaction. This article explores a quantitative approach by focusing on (a) statistical testing of four criteria of interactive governance and (b) using said criteria to evaluate the satisfaction of stakeholders in a policy process. This article highlights the usefulness of a more quantitative approach and provides new insights into the relation between interactive governance and the procedural satisfaction of stakeholders. It also provides insights that help to improve interactive governance in terms of process management to achieve greater procedural satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互动治理在地下规划中的作用
地下提供了许多空间规划机会,因为它为结构提供了空间,但也起到了能源的作用。为了指导开发和利用地下提供的能力,荷兰国家政府启动了一项关于翁德格罗德结构的政策程序(一项总体规划)。利益相关者参与了政策过程,因为许多利益与地下职能有关。然而,过去与地下活动有关的政策过程处理了利益相关者缺乏满意度的问题。本文探讨了一种定量方法,重点是(a)对互动治理的四个标准进行统计测试,以及(b)使用所述标准来评估利益相关者在政策过程中的满意度。本文强调了更量化方法的有用性,并对互动治理和利益相关者程序满意度之间的关系提供了新的见解。它还提供了一些见解,有助于改进流程管理方面的互动治理,以实现更大的程序满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature + Culture
Nature + Culture ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Researching Cities, Transforming Ecology A Chef, a Scientist, and Soil Erosion “You Can't Even Predict the Rain Anymore” Dark Laboratories of the Soil Reframing the Invasive Species Challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1