Different Strokes for Different Folks: The Role of Psychological Needs and Other Risk Factors in Early Radicalisation

Alex I. Macdougall, J. Veen, Allard R. Feddes, L. Nickolson, B. Doosje
{"title":"Different Strokes for Different Folks: The Role of Psychological Needs and Other Risk Factors in Early Radicalisation","authors":"Alex I. Macdougall, J. Veen, Allard R. Feddes, L. Nickolson, B. Doosje","doi":"10.3233/DEV-170232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radicalising individuals gradually accept violence as legitimate to instigate political and/or societal changes. In two studies, we investigate the beginning phase of the radicalisation process. We examine whether different trajectories into radicalism can be distinguished based on underlying needs, related to identity, injustice, sensation, or significance. Study 1 (N = 179, Mage = 37.6, SDage = 12.1, Rangeage 19–75 years, 46.4% female) investigated the relation between these psychological needs and risk factors of radicalisation such as relative deprivation. Study 2 (N = 183, Mage = 27.2, SDage = 12.0, Rangeage 18–81 years, 53.0% female) examined whether individuals are attracted to organisations that cater to their own psychological needs, and whether individuals who are thought to be more at risk indeed support violent organisations to a greater extent. Findings indicate that individuals with stronger desires for justice and status are attracted to organisations that can gratify such desires. In addition, at-risk individuals indeed support violent organisations to a greater extent. The implications of these findings for future research and government policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":38324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Developmental Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/DEV-170232","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Developmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Radicalising individuals gradually accept violence as legitimate to instigate political and/or societal changes. In two studies, we investigate the beginning phase of the radicalisation process. We examine whether different trajectories into radicalism can be distinguished based on underlying needs, related to identity, injustice, sensation, or significance. Study 1 (N = 179, Mage = 37.6, SDage = 12.1, Rangeage 19–75 years, 46.4% female) investigated the relation between these psychological needs and risk factors of radicalisation such as relative deprivation. Study 2 (N = 183, Mage = 27.2, SDage = 12.0, Rangeage 18–81 years, 53.0% female) examined whether individuals are attracted to organisations that cater to their own psychological needs, and whether individuals who are thought to be more at risk indeed support violent organisations to a greater extent. Findings indicate that individuals with stronger desires for justice and status are attracted to organisations that can gratify such desires. In addition, at-risk individuals indeed support violent organisations to a greater extent. The implications of these findings for future research and government policy are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同人群的不同中风:心理需求和其他风险因素在早期激进化中的作用
激进的个人逐渐接受暴力是合法的,以煽动政治和/或社会变革。在两项研究中,我们调查了激进化过程的开始阶段。我们研究了激进主义的不同轨迹是否可以根据与身份、不公正、感觉或意义相关的潜在需求来区分。研究1(N=179,Mage=37.6,SDage=12.1,年龄19-75岁,46.4%为女性)调查了这些心理需求与激进化风险因素(如相对剥夺)之间的关系。研究2(N=183,Mage=27.2,SDage=12.0,年龄18-81岁,53.0%为女性)调查了个人是否被迎合自己心理需求的组织所吸引,以及被认为风险更大的个人是否确实在更大程度上支持暴力组织。研究结果表明,对正义和地位有更强欲望的人会被能够满足这种欲望的组织所吸引。此外,有风险的个人确实在更大程度上支持暴力组织。讨论了这些发现对未来研究和政府政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Developmental Sciences
International Journal of Developmental Sciences Social Sciences-Life-span and Life-course Studies
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Predicting Adolescents’ Intentions to Support Victims of Bullying from Expected Reactions of Friends versus Peers A Meta-Analysis on the Link Between Young People’s Social Environment, Socioeconomic Status, and Political Violence Outcomes Honor Endorsement in Male Youth: A General Risk Factor for Aggressive Behavior? Extremist Thinking and Doing: A Systematic Literature Study of Empirical Findings on Factors Associated with (De)Radicalisation Processes Special Issue Editorial: Political Socialization as Desiderata of Developmental Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1