Social relationship quality among women with spinal cord injury – the role of disability acceptance

A. Gabryś
{"title":"Social relationship quality among women with spinal cord injury – the role of disability acceptance","authors":"A. Gabryś","doi":"10.31299/hrri.56.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpersonal relationships among women with spinal cord injury are limited due to numerous barriers. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of disability acceptance in terms of the quality of social relationships among women with spinal cord injury. Social relationship quality was conceptualised as a construct that included two indicators, namely strength of relationship and social support. Ninety (N=90) women with spinal cord injury completed the Strength of Interpersonal Relationships Questionnaire (Zbieg and Słowińska, 2015), Social Support Scale (Kmiecik-Baran, 1995), and Multidimensional Acceptance of Loss Scale (Byra, 2017). Such methodological tools as descriptive statistics, correlation analysis (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) and progressive stepwise regression analysis were used. The study showed that the most important value for the surveyed women was the time devoted to relationships. The most frequent kinds of received support were informational and emotional. In addition, the most common change in the perception of disability acceptance was the containment of its effects and a transformation from comparative value to asset value. A significant correlation between the included variables was observed. It is also well worth mentioning that the two subscales of disability acceptance entailed a predictive function in explaining social relationship quality; however, the two subscales explained a surprisingly low percentage of observed variance. It is reasonable to suggest other ways of explaining this phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":39824,"journal":{"name":"Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31299/hrri.56.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Interpersonal relationships among women with spinal cord injury are limited due to numerous barriers. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of disability acceptance in terms of the quality of social relationships among women with spinal cord injury. Social relationship quality was conceptualised as a construct that included two indicators, namely strength of relationship and social support. Ninety (N=90) women with spinal cord injury completed the Strength of Interpersonal Relationships Questionnaire (Zbieg and Słowińska, 2015), Social Support Scale (Kmiecik-Baran, 1995), and Multidimensional Acceptance of Loss Scale (Byra, 2017). Such methodological tools as descriptive statistics, correlation analysis (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) and progressive stepwise regression analysis were used. The study showed that the most important value for the surveyed women was the time devoted to relationships. The most frequent kinds of received support were informational and emotional. In addition, the most common change in the perception of disability acceptance was the containment of its effects and a transformation from comparative value to asset value. A significant correlation between the included variables was observed. It is also well worth mentioning that the two subscales of disability acceptance entailed a predictive function in explaining social relationship quality; however, the two subscales explained a surprisingly low percentage of observed variance. It is reasonable to suggest other ways of explaining this phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤女性的社会关系质量——残疾接受度的作用
脊髓损伤妇女之间的人际关系由于许多障碍而受到限制。本研究的目的是调查脊髓损伤妇女在社会关系质量方面接受残疾的作用。社会关系质量被概念化为一个包括两个指标的结构,即关系强度和社会支持。90名(N=90)脊髓损伤妇女完成了人际关系强度问卷(Zbieg和Słowińska,2015)、社会支持量表(Kmiecik Baran,1995)和多维损失接受量表(Byra,2017)。使用描述性统计、相关分析(Pearson相关系数)和逐步逐步回归分析等方法学工具。研究表明,对接受调查的女性来说,最重要的价值是花在人际关系上的时间。最常见的支持类型是信息支持和情感支持。此外,对残疾接受的看法最常见的变化是对其影响的遏制,以及从比较价值向资产价值的转变。纳入的变量之间存在显著相关性。同样值得一提的是,残疾接受度的两个分量表在解释社会关系质量方面具有预测功能;然而,这两个分量表解释了观察到的方差百分比低得惊人。有理由提出其他方法来解释这一现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja
Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja, sljednik časopisa Defektologija, objavljuje radove iz područja edukacijsko-rehabilitacijskih, biomedicinskih, humanističkih, te drugih društvenih znanosti, kao i različitih područja umjetnosti povezanih s pitanjima prevencije, dijagnostike i procjene, tretmana i sveobuhvatne podrške u zajednici za osobe s posebnim potrebama i poremećajima u ponašanju. Primarno je usmjerena na objavljivanje suvremenih znanstvenih i stručnih spoznaja.
期刊最新文献
Functionality and social support as aspects of quality of life in elderly stroke patients Perspectives of mothers on the quality of life of children with epidermolysis bullosa and their parent Zadovoljstvo i školski uspjeh učenika koji se školuju po redovnom programu uz individualizirane postupke Exploratory study of spoken and sign language comprehension among Deaf and Hard-of-hearing adults in Slovenia Characteristics and parental viewpoints regarding digital device use in children aged 4 to 8 years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1