There Is no I in EAFM Adapting Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Coastal Management Pub Date : 2020-11-28 DOI:10.1080/08920753.2021.1846156
B. Muffley, S. Gaichas, G. DePiper, R. Seagraves, S. Lucey
{"title":"There Is no I in EAFM Adapting Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management","authors":"B. Muffley, S. Gaichas, G. DePiper, R. Seagraves, S. Lucey","doi":"10.1080/08920753.2021.1846156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Resource managers worldwide are being asked to consider the ecosystem while making management decisions. Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) provides a flexible framework for addressing ecosystem considerations in decision making. The US Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) adapted the IEA approach and implemented a structured decision framework to address species, fleet, habitat, and climate interactions as part of their Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) in 2016. The Council’s EAFM decision framework first uses risk assessment to prioritize fishery-ecosystem interactions for consideration. The Council’s 2017 EAFM risk assessment identified a range of ecological, social, and management objectives or risk elements. Development of a conceptual model to identify key environmental, ecological, social, economic, and management linkages for a high-priority fishery is the second step in the framework. The Council identified summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) as a high-risk fishery and finalized an EAFM conceptual model that considers high-risk factors and ecosystem elements in 2019. The Council used the conceptual model to identify three priority summer flounder management questions (recreational data uncertainty, recreational discards, and distribution shifts) to be considered for quantitative management strategy evaluation, the third step in the EAFM framework and set to begin in 2020. Finally, as strategies are implemented, outcomes are monitored and the process is adjusted, and/or other priorities identified in the risk assessment can be addressed. The Council’s rapid progress in implementing EAFM resulted from an extensive, positive, and collaborative process between managers, stakeholders, and scientists. Collaboration helps build trust and buy-in from all participants and is essential to IEA and to the success of EAFM.","PeriodicalId":50995,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846156","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract Resource managers worldwide are being asked to consider the ecosystem while making management decisions. Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) provides a flexible framework for addressing ecosystem considerations in decision making. The US Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) adapted the IEA approach and implemented a structured decision framework to address species, fleet, habitat, and climate interactions as part of their Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) in 2016. The Council’s EAFM decision framework first uses risk assessment to prioritize fishery-ecosystem interactions for consideration. The Council’s 2017 EAFM risk assessment identified a range of ecological, social, and management objectives or risk elements. Development of a conceptual model to identify key environmental, ecological, social, economic, and management linkages for a high-priority fishery is the second step in the framework. The Council identified summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) as a high-risk fishery and finalized an EAFM conceptual model that considers high-risk factors and ecosystem elements in 2019. The Council used the conceptual model to identify three priority summer flounder management questions (recreational data uncertainty, recreational discards, and distribution shifts) to be considered for quantitative management strategy evaluation, the third step in the EAFM framework and set to begin in 2020. Finally, as strategies are implemented, outcomes are monitored and the process is adjusted, and/or other priorities identified in the risk assessment can be addressed. The Council’s rapid progress in implementing EAFM resulted from an extensive, positive, and collaborative process between managers, stakeholders, and scientists. Collaboration helps build trust and buy-in from all participants and is essential to IEA and to the success of EAFM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EAFM中没有I适用于中大西洋渔业管理的综合生态系统评估
摘要世界各地的资源管理者被要求在做出管理决策时考虑生态系统。综合生态系统评估(IEA)为解决决策中的生态系统考虑因素提供了一个灵活的框架。2016年,美国大西洋中部渔业管理委员会(理事会)调整了国际能源署的方法,并实施了一个结构化的决策框架,以解决物种、船队、栖息地和气候相互作用问题,作为其渔业管理生态系统方法的一部分。理事会的EAFM决策框架首先使用风险评估来优先考虑渔业生态系统的相互作用。理事会2017年EAFM风险评估确定了一系列生态、社会和管理目标或风险要素。制定一个概念模型,以确定高度优先渔业的关键环境、生态、社会、经济和管理联系,是该框架的第二步。理事会将夏季牙鲆(Paralichthys dentatus)确定为高风险渔业,并于2019年最终确定了考虑高风险因素和生态系统因素的EAFM概念模型。理事会使用概念模型确定了三个优先考虑的夏季比目鱼管理问题(娱乐数据的不确定性、娱乐丢弃物和分布变化),以进行定量管理战略评估,这是EAFM框架中的第三步,将于2020年开始。最后,随着战略的实施,结果得到监测,过程得到调整,和/或风险评估中确定的其他优先事项可以得到解决。理事会在实施EAFM方面取得的快速进展得益于管理人员、利益相关者和科学家之间广泛、积极和协作的过程。合作有助于建立信任并获得所有参与者的认可,对IEA和EAFM的成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Management
Coastal Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coastal Management is an international peer-reviewed, applied research journal dedicated to exploring the technical, applied ecological, legal, political, social, and policy issues relating to the use of coastal and ocean resources and environments on a global scale. The journal presents timely information on management tools and techniques as well as recent findings from research and analysis that bear directly on management and policy. Findings must be grounded in the current peer reviewed literature and relevant studies. Articles must contain a clear and relevant management component. Preference is given to studies of interest to an international readership, but case studies are accepted if conclusions are derived from acceptable evaluative methods, reference to comparable cases, and related to peer reviewed studies.
期刊最新文献
Coastal and Marine Ecosystems of the Arafura and Timor Seas – Characterization, Key Features and Ecological Significance A Resilient Marine Protected Area Network Design: A First for the Arafura Timor Seas Transboundary Environmental Harm and the Increasing Risk of Oil Spills and Marine Debris in the Semi-Enclosed Arafura and Timor Seas Region A Call for a Cultural Shift in Oceanography ATSEA: A Regional Collaboration to Address Transboundary Threats to Ecosystems for Human Well-Being in the Arafura and Timor Seas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1