A history of content marketing

Fred Beard, Brian A. Petrotta, Ludwig Dischner
{"title":"A history of content marketing","authors":"Fred Beard, Brian A. Petrotta, Ludwig Dischner","doi":"10.1108/jhrm-10-2020-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nContemporary practitioners of content marketing (CM) often suggest their discipline is an ancient one, yet mainly limit its origins to the custom-published magazines of the late 1800s. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize some of the many definitions of CM and to report the first scholarly history of its development and practice.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study’s purposes led to the following research questions: To what extent were CM strategies and tactics used before the 20th century? How have the uses and characteristics of CM changed or remained the same over time? Sources included general histories focusing on the earliest uses of advertising and promotions and edited book chapters and journal articles on the histories of branding and early print advertising, marketing and advertising practices in ancient and medieval periods and the development of consumer cultures around the world.\n\n\nFindings\nResearch findings support three conclusions: CM existed much earlier than often acknowledged; has emerged as a unique marketing discipline, strategically and tactically distinguishable from the others (e.g. advertising and sales promotion); and possesses objectives, strategies and tactics that have remained remarkably consistent in practice across the millennia.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research supports several insights to the history of marketing and the practice of CM. Some of the CM strategies and tactics identified in this paper, for instance, have previously been concluded to be part of advertising’s history. Findings also reveal that many of advertising’s American pioneers actually used CM to persuade 19th-century businessmen to adopt widespread advertising. In addition, the emphasis on interactive, digital media in CM definitions offers a likely explanation for the recent enthusiasm behind CM as a response to global trends in consumer preferences and global competition, as well as why contemporary CM practitioners have often failed to recognize they are practicing a “new” discipline that has actually been in use for thousands of years.\n","PeriodicalId":44447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Research in Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Research in Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jhrm-10-2020-0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose Contemporary practitioners of content marketing (CM) often suggest their discipline is an ancient one, yet mainly limit its origins to the custom-published magazines of the late 1800s. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize some of the many definitions of CM and to report the first scholarly history of its development and practice. Design/methodology/approach This study’s purposes led to the following research questions: To what extent were CM strategies and tactics used before the 20th century? How have the uses and characteristics of CM changed or remained the same over time? Sources included general histories focusing on the earliest uses of advertising and promotions and edited book chapters and journal articles on the histories of branding and early print advertising, marketing and advertising practices in ancient and medieval periods and the development of consumer cultures around the world. Findings Research findings support three conclusions: CM existed much earlier than often acknowledged; has emerged as a unique marketing discipline, strategically and tactically distinguishable from the others (e.g. advertising and sales promotion); and possesses objectives, strategies and tactics that have remained remarkably consistent in practice across the millennia. Originality/value The research supports several insights to the history of marketing and the practice of CM. Some of the CM strategies and tactics identified in this paper, for instance, have previously been concluded to be part of advertising’s history. Findings also reveal that many of advertising’s American pioneers actually used CM to persuade 19th-century businessmen to adopt widespread advertising. In addition, the emphasis on interactive, digital media in CM definitions offers a likely explanation for the recent enthusiasm behind CM as a response to global trends in consumer preferences and global competition, as well as why contemporary CM practitioners have often failed to recognize they are practicing a “new” discipline that has actually been in use for thousands of years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内容营销的历史
内容营销(CM)的临时实践者经常暗示他们的学科是一个古老的学科,但主要将其起源限制在19世纪后期的定制出版杂志。本文的目的是综合CM的许多定义中的一些,并报告其发展和实践的第一个学术历史。本研究的目的导致了以下研究问题:在20世纪之前,CM战略和战术的使用程度如何?随着时间的推移,CM的用途和特征是如何改变或保持不变的?来源包括关注最早使用广告和促销的通史,以及关于品牌历史和早期印刷广告、古代和中世纪时期的营销和广告实践以及世界各地消费文化发展的编辑书籍章节和期刊文章。研究结果支持三个结论:CM的存在比人们通常认为的要早得多;已成为一门独特的营销学科,在战略和战术上与其他学科(如广告和促销)区别开来;它拥有的目标、战略和战术在几千年来的实践中一直保持着惊人的一致性。独创性/价值这项研究支持了对市场营销历史和营销管理实践的一些见解。例如,本文中确定的一些CM策略和战术,以前已经被认为是广告历史的一部分。研究结果还显示,许多广告的美国先驱实际上是用CM来说服19世纪的商人采用广泛的广告。此外,CM定义中对交互式、数字媒体的强调可能解释了最近CM背后的热情,作为对消费者偏好和全球竞争的全球趋势的回应,以及为什么当代CM从业者经常未能认识到他们正在实践一门实际上已经使用了数千年的“新”学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Launched in 2009, Journal of Historical Research in Marketing is the only quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality, original, academic research that focuses entirely on marketing history and the history of marketing thought. Pedagogical and historiographical / methodological essays are also welcome as long as they are grounded in a marketing and historical context. The essence of an historical perspective is a thorough, systematic, critical awareness of the changes (or continuity) in events over time and of the context in which change or continuity occurs. In addition to regular full length research articles, the Journal occasionally features material under the following sections. Explorations & Insights includes invited commentaries about marketing history and the history of marketing thought. These tend to be shorter (three to six thousand words) than the full articles that run in each issue. Sources of Historical Research in Marketing includes short essays introducing unexplored and novel archives and other primary historical resources, their contents and relevance to marketing history. Archivists or library professionals who believe their collections might be of interest to marketing historians are invited to submit essays to contribute to this section. JHRM also invites historical review essays that focus on historically important marketing books under the section Forgotten Classics. Examples of these historical reviews can be found in past issues of the Journal and those suggest an approach for potential submissions. Authors are advised to check with the editor about the suitability of a book title before submitting a Forgotten Classics review for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Labyrinth of feminine beauty: onnagata in modern Japanese advertising Dying to understand how historical trends and influential intermediaries impact the future of sustainable deathcare Assessing food preferences in Spain: a historical perspective including attributes and values Adaptation of marketing mix strategies in Mexican cultural institutions: an insight into prehispanic and novohispanic codices From public to market use: a historical perspective on the changes in health data collection and use in France from 1930 to the present
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1