In vitro investigation of antibacterial activity against fecal bacteria infecting wounds

Q1 Medicine Wound Medicine Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wndm.2019.100169
Hitoshi Hirashima , Yuna Komori , Yosuke Kohinata , Michio Komai , Kouhei Fukushima
{"title":"In vitro investigation of antibacterial activity against fecal bacteria infecting wounds","authors":"Hitoshi Hirashima ,&nbsp;Yuna Komori ,&nbsp;Yosuke Kohinata ,&nbsp;Michio Komai ,&nbsp;Kouhei Fukushima","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2019.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fecal bacterial wound infection is common in both gastrointestinal surgery and decubitus ulcers. Various approaches have been developed to suppress bacterial growth. Antibacterial activity shown by the conventional assays using a few representative strains may not necessarily be similar to <em>in vitro</em> activity at infection sites.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of the present study was to develop a simple and easy <em>in vitro</em> assay system to investigate antibacterial activity against fecal bacteria and to evaluate its validity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The cultures contained Hank’s balanced salt solution containing 10% fetal calf serum as a culture medium and were incubated at 37 °C with constant stirring in room air. Fecal bacterial growth was evaluated by several methods, including optical density at 600 nm, analysis of bacterial DNAs, real time-polymerase chain reaction, and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. Four methods were investigated for inhibiting fecal bacterial growth.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Facultative anaerobes, including <em>E. coli</em>, <em>Enterococcus faecaliss,</em> and <em>Lactobacillus</em> species, increased after culture in contrast to the decrease in obligate anaerobes, <em>Clostridium coccoides</em>, <em>Clostridium leptum</em>, <em>Bactroides fragilis</em>, <em>Prevotella,</em> and <em>Bifidobacterium</em> species. The addition of 5 mM EDTA, activated carbons, maintenance of the medium pH at 4.4, and the combination of the above inhibited the increase in optical density.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This <em>in vitro</em> assay is easy to use, partly simulates fecal bacterial growth <em>in vivo</em>, and can be used to measure fecal bacterial growth inhibition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2019.100169","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221390951930014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fecal bacterial wound infection is common in both gastrointestinal surgery and decubitus ulcers. Various approaches have been developed to suppress bacterial growth. Antibacterial activity shown by the conventional assays using a few representative strains may not necessarily be similar to in vitro activity at infection sites.

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to develop a simple and easy in vitro assay system to investigate antibacterial activity against fecal bacteria and to evaluate its validity.

Methods

The cultures contained Hank’s balanced salt solution containing 10% fetal calf serum as a culture medium and were incubated at 37 °C with constant stirring in room air. Fecal bacterial growth was evaluated by several methods, including optical density at 600 nm, analysis of bacterial DNAs, real time-polymerase chain reaction, and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. Four methods were investigated for inhibiting fecal bacterial growth.

Results

Facultative anaerobes, including E. coli, Enterococcus faecaliss, and Lactobacillus species, increased after culture in contrast to the decrease in obligate anaerobes, Clostridium coccoides, Clostridium leptum, Bactroides fragilis, Prevotella, and Bifidobacterium species. The addition of 5 mM EDTA, activated carbons, maintenance of the medium pH at 4.4, and the combination of the above inhibited the increase in optical density.

Conclusion

This in vitro assay is easy to use, partly simulates fecal bacterial growth in vivo, and can be used to measure fecal bacterial growth inhibition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外对伤口感染粪便细菌抗菌活性的研究
背景:粪便细菌性伤口感染在胃肠道手术和褥疮中都很常见。已经开发了各种方法来抑制细菌的生长。使用少数代表性菌株的常规测定所显示的抗菌活性不一定与感染部位的体外活性相似。目的建立一种简便易行的体外抑菌试验体系,以考察其对粪便细菌的抑菌活性,并对其有效性进行评价。方法以含10%胎牛血清的汉克平衡盐溶液为培养基,在37 °C室温下持续搅拌培养。通过多种方法评估粪便细菌的生长情况,包括600 nm光密度、细菌dna分析、实时聚合酶链反应和末端限制性片段长度多态性。研究了四种抑制粪便细菌生长的方法。结果兼性厌氧菌(包括大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌和乳杆菌)培养后数量增加,专性厌氧菌(包括球芽梭菌、瘦梭菌、脆弱杆菌、普雷沃氏菌和双歧杆菌)培养后数量减少。添加5 mM EDTA、活性炭、维持培养基pH为4.4,以及上述组合抑制了光密度的增加。结论该方法操作简便,能部分模拟粪便细菌在体内的生长情况,可用于测定粪便细菌的生长抑制情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healing potential of Caiman yacare (Daudin, 1802) visceral fat oil Fibrin sealant for split-thickness skin graft fixation in burn wounds - An ancillary postulated role in scar modulation Graphene-based materials in drug delivery and growth factor release: A critical review Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes accelerate open wound healing better than amniotic membranes: A histological study on the proliferation phase Honey based treatment strategies for infected wounds and burns: A systematic review of recent pre-clinical research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1