Using Materiality Analysis to Determine Actual and Potential Company Impacts on Sustainable Development

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES European Journal of Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n2p90
T. Menichini, Gennaro Salierno
{"title":"Using Materiality Analysis to Determine Actual and Potential Company Impacts on Sustainable Development","authors":"T. Menichini, Gennaro Salierno","doi":"10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n2p90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To contribute to sustainable development companies are called to identify and manage their impacts in a transparent and reliable manner. Materiality Analysis in sustainability reporting helps companies determine the threshold at which sustainability topics become sufficiently important to be included in the report, according to significant organisation’s impacts and to stakeholder’s interests and concerns. To deliver the highest level of transparency for organisational impacts on the economy, environment, a nd people, the latest version of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, the “Universal Standard 2021”, propose to identify and assess both actual and potential material impacts. In light of this suggestion, the present paper proposes the Materiality Cube as a practical and structured approach for supporting the analysis of organisation’s impacts. The proposed tool allows to evaluate the materiality of impacts considering the company’s strategy, sustainability performance and stakeholder expectations. By comparing the positioning of sustainability topics under the three assessment dimensions, companies can improve the overall process of determining materiality and the accountability towards stakeholders: they can act to address and account for the most material impacts and identify those that could become material over time since they result much more significant from one perspective than the others. An illustrative application of the proposed Materiality Cube completes the paper.","PeriodicalId":46519,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sustainable Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n2p90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To contribute to sustainable development companies are called to identify and manage their impacts in a transparent and reliable manner. Materiality Analysis in sustainability reporting helps companies determine the threshold at which sustainability topics become sufficiently important to be included in the report, according to significant organisation’s impacts and to stakeholder’s interests and concerns. To deliver the highest level of transparency for organisational impacts on the economy, environment, a nd people, the latest version of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, the “Universal Standard 2021”, propose to identify and assess both actual and potential material impacts. In light of this suggestion, the present paper proposes the Materiality Cube as a practical and structured approach for supporting the analysis of organisation’s impacts. The proposed tool allows to evaluate the materiality of impacts considering the company’s strategy, sustainability performance and stakeholder expectations. By comparing the positioning of sustainability topics under the three assessment dimensions, companies can improve the overall process of determining materiality and the accountability towards stakeholders: they can act to address and account for the most material impacts and identify those that could become material over time since they result much more significant from one perspective than the others. An illustrative application of the proposed Materiality Cube completes the paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用重要性分析来确定公司对可持续发展的实际和潜在影响
为了促进可持续发展,公司被要求以透明和可靠的方式识别和管理其影响。可持续性报告中的重要性分析有助于公司根据重要组织的影响以及利益相关者的利益和担忧,确定可持续性主题变得足够重要以纳入报告的阈值。为了为组织对经济、环境和人民的影响提供最高水平的透明度,最新版本的全球报告倡议(GRI)指南“2021年通用标准”建议识别和评估实际和潜在的物质影响。根据这一建议,本文提出了物性立方体,作为一种实用且结构化的方法来支持组织影响的分析。拟议的工具允许在考虑公司战略、可持续发展绩效和利益相关者期望的情况下评估影响的实质性。通过比较可持续性主题在三个评估维度下的定位,公司可以改进确定重要性的整体过程和对利益相关者的问责:他们可以采取行动来解决和解释最重大的影响,并确定那些随着时间的推移可能变得重要的影响,因为从一个角度来看,这些影响比从另一个角度看要重要得多。文中给出了所提出的物性立方的一个应用实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Consumption in the Behavior of Young Consumers Corporations vs. Countries. Fostering Governance Sustainability in a Global Environment Change Factors Towards Sustainability at the Example of Hospitals’ Secondary Processes A Gamified Approach to Engage Sustainable User Behavior in Product Service System Solutions Socio-cultural Sustainability for Resilience in Public Services: Strategies for Achieving Inclusive and Equitable Service Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1