Acute Venom Toxicity Determinations for Five Iranian Vipers and a Scorpion

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Iranian Journal of Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.32598/ijt.16.2.569.2
B. Fathi, Fatemeh Younesi, F. Salami
{"title":"Acute Venom Toxicity Determinations for Five Iranian Vipers and a Scorpion","authors":"B. Fathi, Fatemeh Younesi, F. Salami","doi":"10.32598/ijt.16.2.569.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poisoning due to the bites and stings of venomous snakes and scorpions is a neglected public health problem, particularly in rural areas. Poor health facilities and inadequate knowledge of health care personnel are the major factors that result in envenomated human victims not receiving adequate care and medical attention. There is a great need for up-to-date and effective healthcare knowledge and awareness of the potency and lethality of venomous creatures in Iran. Assessment of the potency, acute toxicity, and lethal effects of venomous creatures come from a variety of specific tests, such as the 50% median lethal dose (LD50) and ample animal experimentations. Methods: In the present study, using modified Reed-Muench method, the LD0, LD50, and LD100 values of the venoms from five Iranian vipers and one scorpion were determined. The studied venomous creatures were: Macrovipera lebetina, Vipera albicornuta, Vipera raddei, Caucasicus intemedius agkistrodon, Montivipera latifii, and one scorpion Hemiscorpius lepturus. The venoms were injected in Albino mice (n=204) intraperitoneally, and their toxicities determined. Results: The results revealed that the LD50 values of the above-mentioned creatures were 3.87, 2.05, 1.63, 1.45, 0.84, and 6.33 mg/kg, respectively. Among the vipers, M. latifii had the most potent venom while M. lebetina’s venom had the lowest toxicity. Conclusion: Theoretically, the determined LD50 values provide for objective comparisons of the toxicity among of the venoms. However, comparison becomes complicated due to variations in the venoms’ LD50. Further, based on the venoms’ toxicity levels, H. lepturus’ venom caused the lowest toxicity in the Albino mice.","PeriodicalId":14637,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/ijt.16.2.569.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Poisoning due to the bites and stings of venomous snakes and scorpions is a neglected public health problem, particularly in rural areas. Poor health facilities and inadequate knowledge of health care personnel are the major factors that result in envenomated human victims not receiving adequate care and medical attention. There is a great need for up-to-date and effective healthcare knowledge and awareness of the potency and lethality of venomous creatures in Iran. Assessment of the potency, acute toxicity, and lethal effects of venomous creatures come from a variety of specific tests, such as the 50% median lethal dose (LD50) and ample animal experimentations. Methods: In the present study, using modified Reed-Muench method, the LD0, LD50, and LD100 values of the venoms from five Iranian vipers and one scorpion were determined. The studied venomous creatures were: Macrovipera lebetina, Vipera albicornuta, Vipera raddei, Caucasicus intemedius agkistrodon, Montivipera latifii, and one scorpion Hemiscorpius lepturus. The venoms were injected in Albino mice (n=204) intraperitoneally, and their toxicities determined. Results: The results revealed that the LD50 values of the above-mentioned creatures were 3.87, 2.05, 1.63, 1.45, 0.84, and 6.33 mg/kg, respectively. Among the vipers, M. latifii had the most potent venom while M. lebetina’s venom had the lowest toxicity. Conclusion: Theoretically, the determined LD50 values provide for objective comparisons of the toxicity among of the venoms. However, comparison becomes complicated due to variations in the venoms’ LD50. Further, based on the venoms’ toxicity levels, H. lepturus’ venom caused the lowest toxicity in the Albino mice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
五种伊朗毒蛇和一种蝎子的急性毒液毒性测定
背景:毒蛇和蝎子叮咬引起的中毒是一个被忽视的公共卫生问题,特别是在农村地区。卫生设施差和卫生保健人员的知识不足是导致受毒害的人类受害者得不到充分照顾和医疗照顾的主要因素。伊朗非常需要最新和有效的保健知识以及对有毒生物的效力和致命性的认识。有毒生物的效力、急性毒性和致死效应的评估来自各种特定的试验,例如50%中位致死剂量(LD50)和大量的动物实验。方法:采用改良Reed-Muench法测定5种伊朗蝰蛇和1种蝎子毒液的LD0、LD50和LD100值。所研究的毒蛇有:白桦大毒蛇、白角蝮蛇、拉氏蝮蛇、中天蝮蛇、latifia Montivipera agkistrodon和一只半角蝎。以204只白化病小鼠腹腔注射毒液,测定其毒性。结果:上述生物的LD50值分别为3.87、2.05、1.63、1.45、0.84和6.33 mg/kg。在毒蛇中,毒力最强的是大毒蛇,毒力最低的是大毒蛇。结论:从理论上讲,测定的LD50值为各毒液间的毒性比较提供了客观依据。然而,由于毒液的LD50不同,比较变得复杂。此外,根据毒液的毒性水平,lepturus的毒液对白化小鼠的毒性最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Toxicology
Iranian Journal of Toxicology Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Anti-fertility Potentials of 3-Monochloropropane-1, 2-diol (Alpha-Chlorohydrin) and Testosterone in Adult Male Wild Nile Grass Rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) for Rodent Control Impact of Sodium Metabisulfite on Oxidative Stress, Hormones, and Reproductive Tissue in Female Wistar Rats Alginate Lyase from Streptomyces olivaceus is a Safe and Effective Antibiofilm in Male Wistar Rats (Rattus norvegicus) The Lactobacillus acidophilus Supernatant: An Effective and Safe Alternative to Antibiotics Apoptotic Effect of Phycocyanin on HT-29 Colon Cancer through Activation of Caspase Enzymes and P53 Cell Signaling Pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1