The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: a tool with potential for an evolving role in cancer pain assessment and management

P. Lawlor, Niamh Lawlor, P. Reis-Pina
{"title":"The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: a tool with potential for an evolving role in cancer pain assessment and management","authors":"P. Lawlor, Niamh Lawlor, P. Reis-Pina","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2018.1467211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Undertreatment of cancer pain is associated with inadequate assessment and inconsistent or non-standardized classification, resulting in failure to both appreciate its multidimensional nature and appropriately target therapeutic interventions. This review examines the classification of cancer pain with a focus on the progressive development of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP); the appropriateness of its constituent features, associated outcomes and its potential future development in cancer pain classification. Areas covered: A Medline search from 1989 to November 2017, using combined terms ‘cancer’ or ‘oncology’, ‘Edmonton’, ‘pain’ or ‘analgesia’, and ‘staging’ or ‘classification’, identified 280 records. A total of 20 studies with empirical data relating to validation studies of the ECS-CP or evaluation of either its constituent or proposed domains were selected for inclusion in the core review. Expert commentary: The ECS-CP is a tool in evolution and a valid template for further cancer pain classification development. The assessment of ECS-CP domains requires a standardized approach. The domain ratings can inform the therapeutic strategy, and are associated with pain management outcomes, particularly stable pain control. The ECS-CP enables standardized reporting, based on patients’ pain and related characteristics, and thus may improve the validity of comparisons across research study samples.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"3 1","pages":"47 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2018.1467211","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2018.1467211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Undertreatment of cancer pain is associated with inadequate assessment and inconsistent or non-standardized classification, resulting in failure to both appreciate its multidimensional nature and appropriately target therapeutic interventions. This review examines the classification of cancer pain with a focus on the progressive development of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP); the appropriateness of its constituent features, associated outcomes and its potential future development in cancer pain classification. Areas covered: A Medline search from 1989 to November 2017, using combined terms ‘cancer’ or ‘oncology’, ‘Edmonton’, ‘pain’ or ‘analgesia’, and ‘staging’ or ‘classification’, identified 280 records. A total of 20 studies with empirical data relating to validation studies of the ECS-CP or evaluation of either its constituent or proposed domains were selected for inclusion in the core review. Expert commentary: The ECS-CP is a tool in evolution and a valid template for further cancer pain classification development. The assessment of ECS-CP domains requires a standardized approach. The domain ratings can inform the therapeutic strategy, and are associated with pain management outcomes, particularly stable pain control. The ECS-CP enables standardized reporting, based on patients’ pain and related characteristics, and thus may improve the validity of comparisons across research study samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃德蒙顿癌症疼痛分类系统:在癌症疼痛评估和管理中具有发展潜力的工具
摘要:癌症疼痛的治疗不足与评估不充分和不一致或不标准化的分类有关,导致未能认识到其多维性和适当的靶向治疗干预。本文综述了癌症疼痛的分类,重点介绍了埃德蒙顿癌症疼痛分类系统(ECS-CP)的逐步发展;其组成特征的适当性,相关结果及其在癌痛分类中的潜在未来发展。涵盖领域:从1989年到2017年11月的Medline搜索,使用组合术语“癌症”或“肿瘤学”,“埃德蒙顿”,“疼痛”或“镇痛”,“分期”或“分类”,确定了280条记录。共有20项研究的实证数据与ECS-CP的验证研究或其成分或拟议领域的评估有关,被选择纳入核心综述。专家评论:ECS-CP是一种进化中的工具,也是进一步癌症疼痛分类发展的有效模板。ECS-CP域的评估需要一种标准化的方法。区域评分可以告知治疗策略,并与疼痛管理结果有关,特别是稳定的疼痛控制。ECS-CP可以根据患者的疼痛和相关特征进行标准化报告,从而可以提高研究样本间比较的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in people with cancer The supportive roles of spirituality and mindfulness in patients’ cancer journeys Physical activity and nutritional interventions and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: a review Fertility decision-making in cancer patients – current status and future directions Predicting survival of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1