Ethical Approaches to Youth Data in Historical Web Archives (Dispatch)

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Studies in Social Justice Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2541
Katie Mackinnon
{"title":"Ethical Approaches to Youth Data in Historical Web Archives (Dispatch)","authors":"Katie Mackinnon","doi":"10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My doctoral research focuses on the experiences of young people learning about and exploring the World Wide Web from Canadian homes, schools, libraries and community centres between 1994-2004. While there are many intersecting facets of my research that include federal policy interventions, public discourse in Canadian media, and oral interviews, I engage significantly with web archives in order to provide perspectives from young and marginalized people who were creating websites and community on the early web. My research has focused on GeoCities, one of the most popular web hosting platforms between 1996-1999. GeoCities users, called could websites for free in different that and hobbies, the the were significant archival efforts to preserve the once-thriving online community in the Archive. For researchers, this archive poses significant ethical, methodological and epistemological issues. Although it is a valuable resource for researching a history of the online communities on the early web, it also creates opportunities for harmful data practices while also calling into question individuals’ “right to be forgotten” (EU, 2016b). This dispatch explores some ethical questions that have emerged through my research on digital experiences of young people throughout the 1990-2000s and the use of archived web materials created at that time by young people who were under the age of 18.","PeriodicalId":44923,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Justice","volume":"15 1","pages":"442-449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

My doctoral research focuses on the experiences of young people learning about and exploring the World Wide Web from Canadian homes, schools, libraries and community centres between 1994-2004. While there are many intersecting facets of my research that include federal policy interventions, public discourse in Canadian media, and oral interviews, I engage significantly with web archives in order to provide perspectives from young and marginalized people who were creating websites and community on the early web. My research has focused on GeoCities, one of the most popular web hosting platforms between 1996-1999. GeoCities users, called could websites for free in different that and hobbies, the the were significant archival efforts to preserve the once-thriving online community in the Archive. For researchers, this archive poses significant ethical, methodological and epistemological issues. Although it is a valuable resource for researching a history of the online communities on the early web, it also creates opportunities for harmful data practices while also calling into question individuals’ “right to be forgotten” (EU, 2016b). This dispatch explores some ethical questions that have emerged through my research on digital experiences of young people throughout the 1990-2000s and the use of archived web materials created at that time by young people who were under the age of 18.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史网络档案中青少年数据的伦理方法(快讯)
我的博士研究重点是1994-2004年间年轻人在加拿大家庭、学校、图书馆和社区中心学习和探索万维网的经历。虽然我的研究有许多交叉的方面,包括联邦政策干预、加拿大媒体的公共话语和口头采访,但我大量参与网络档案,以提供早期网络上创建网站和社区的年轻人和边缘化人群的观点。我的研究重点是GeoCities,1996-1999年间最受欢迎的网络托管平台之一。GeoCities的用户,被称为可以免费访问不同类型和爱好的网站,这些都是档案馆为保护档案馆中曾经繁荣的在线社区所做的重大档案工作。对研究人员来说,这份档案提出了重大的伦理、方法论和认识论问题。尽管它是研究早期网络上在线社区历史的宝贵资源,但它也为有害数据做法创造了机会,同时也对个人的“被遗忘权”提出了质疑(欧盟,2016b)。这篇文章探讨了我对1990-2000年代年轻人的数字体验以及18岁以下年轻人使用当时创建的存档网络材料的研究中出现的一些道德问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Social Justice
Studies in Social Justice POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Super Visa Program: Immigration Policy Changes and Social Injustice under the Neoliberal Governmentality in Canada Infrastructures of Harm, Communities of Knowledge and Environmental Justice Risky Others: Covid-19 Reconstitutions of Risk, Governance, and Stigmatization of Bodies Landscapes of Injustice, Landscapes of Repair (Editor's Introduction) Collective Memories and Community Interventions: Peace Building in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1