Wait-and-See or Whack-a-Mole: What Is the Best Way to Regulate Fintech in China?

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Asian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1017/als.2022.7
Duoqi Xu, C. John Taylor, Yuanda Ren
{"title":"Wait-and-See or Whack-a-Mole: What Is the Best Way to Regulate Fintech in China?","authors":"Duoqi Xu, C. John Taylor, Yuanda Ren","doi":"10.1017/als.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Chinese fintech, initially taking the form as “Internet finance,” is growing rapidly and poses great challenges to its financial regulatory authorities. Acclaimed as a new financial innovation, Internet finance was once accepted and even welcomed by the normally conservative Chinese financial regulators, who simultaneously adopted a wait-and-see strategy, to encourage such innovation and avoid overwhelming regulation. The benevolent regulation stance, however, bred rampant Ponzi schemes or fake financial innovation, resulting in tremendous monetary losses among lots of investors. To show a quick and active response, the central government popped into a whack-a-mole game, starting a four-year campaign of strict Internet finance regulation that has even cracked down on all the P2P lending platforms. This article analyzes the regulatory policy updates of Chinese Internet finance that is transforming to certain kinds of lawful fintech with difficulties, and that adaptive regulatory-organization restructure, regulatory-system optimization, and regulatory-model innovation would be more effective and constructive regulatory options.","PeriodicalId":54015,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Chinese fintech, initially taking the form as “Internet finance,” is growing rapidly and poses great challenges to its financial regulatory authorities. Acclaimed as a new financial innovation, Internet finance was once accepted and even welcomed by the normally conservative Chinese financial regulators, who simultaneously adopted a wait-and-see strategy, to encourage such innovation and avoid overwhelming regulation. The benevolent regulation stance, however, bred rampant Ponzi schemes or fake financial innovation, resulting in tremendous monetary losses among lots of investors. To show a quick and active response, the central government popped into a whack-a-mole game, starting a four-year campaign of strict Internet finance regulation that has even cracked down on all the P2P lending platforms. This article analyzes the regulatory policy updates of Chinese Internet finance that is transforming to certain kinds of lawful fintech with difficulties, and that adaptive regulatory-organization restructure, regulatory-system optimization, and regulatory-model innovation would be more effective and constructive regulatory options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观望还是打地鼠:中国监管金融科技的最佳方式是什么?
中国金融科技最初以“互联网金融”的形式发展迅速,给金融监管部门带来了巨大挑战。互联网金融被誉为一种新的金融创新,曾经被通常保守的中国金融监管机构所接受甚至欢迎,他们同时采取观望策略,鼓励这种创新,避免过度监管。然而,仁慈的监管立场滋生了猖獗的庞氏骗局或虚假的金融创新,给许多投资者带来了巨大的金钱损失。为了显示快速和积极的反应,中央政府开始了一场打地鼠游戏,开始了为期四年的严格互联网金融监管运动,甚至打击了所有的P2P借贷平台。本文分析了中国互联网金融正艰难向某些类型的合法金融科技转型的监管政策更新,认为适应性的监管组织重组、监管制度优化和监管模式创新将是更有效和建设性的监管选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Law and Society (AJLS) adds an increasingly important Asian perspective to global law and society scholarship. This independent, peer-reviewed publication encourages empirical and multi-disciplinary research and welcomes articles on law and its relationship with society in Asia, articles bringing an Asian perspective to socio-legal issues of global concern, and articles using Asia as a starting point for a comparative exploration of law and society topics. Its coverage of Asia is broad and stretches from East Asia, South Asia and South East Asia to Central Asia. A unique combination of a base in Asia and an international editorial team creates a forum for Asian and Western scholars to exchange ideas of interest to Asian scholars and professionals, those working in or on Asia, as well as all working on law and society issues globally.
期刊最新文献
A Dynamic Theory of Prosecutorial Roles in Adversarial Trials Interrogating the Drunkards and Representing Drunkenness in the Qing Law Coexisting with Drug Addiction: Strategies Used by Hong Kong’s Older Mixed Users to Improve Their Perceived Quality of Life Liability Beyond Law: Conceptions of Fairness in Chinese Tort Cases Neocolonial Digitality: Analyzing Digital Legal Databases Using Legal Pluralism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1