Précis of Conjoining Meanings: Semantics Without Truth Values

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Croatian Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020322
P. Pietroski
{"title":"Précis of Conjoining Meanings: Semantics Without Truth Values","authors":"P. Pietroski","doi":"10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Conjoining Meanings, I argue that meanings are composable instructions for how to build concepts of a special kind. In this summary of the main line of argument, I stress that proposals about what linguistic meanings are should make room for the phenomenon of lexical polysemy. On my internalist proposal, a single lexical item can be used to access various concepts on different occasions of use. And if lexical items are often “conceptually equivocal” in this way, then some familiar arguments for externalist conceptions of linguistic meaning need to be reevaluated.","PeriodicalId":43218,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Journal of Philosophy","volume":"20 1","pages":"271-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Conjoining Meanings, I argue that meanings are composable instructions for how to build concepts of a special kind. In this summary of the main line of argument, I stress that proposals about what linguistic meanings are should make room for the phenomenon of lexical polysemy. On my internalist proposal, a single lexical item can be used to access various concepts on different occasions of use. And if lexical items are often “conceptually equivocal” in this way, then some familiar arguments for externalist conceptions of linguistic meaning need to be reevaluated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接意义的实践:没有真值的语义
在《连接意义》一书中,我认为意义是关于如何构建一种特殊概念的可组合指令。在对主要论点的总结中,我强调,关于语言意义的建议应该为词汇多义词现象留出空间。在我的内部建议中,一个单一的词汇项目可以在不同的使用场合访问不同的概念。如果词汇项目经常以这种方式“在概念上模棱两可”,那么我们就需要重新评估一些熟悉的关于语言意义的外在主义概念的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Linguistic Conventions or Open-Ended Reasoning Incoherent Meanings What is a Tense, Anyway? Précis for Context and Coherence The Syntax of Prominence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1