Risk factors associated with low anterior resection syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-03 DOI:10.3393/ac.2022.00227.0032
Lim See Liang, Wan Zainira Wan Zain, Zalina Zahari, Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria, Mohd Nizam Md Hashim, Michael Pak-Kai Wong, Zaidi Zakaria, Rosnelifaizur Ramely, Ahmad Shanwani Mohamed Sidek
{"title":"Risk factors associated with low anterior resection syndrome: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Lim See Liang,&nbsp;Wan Zainira Wan Zain,&nbsp;Zalina Zahari,&nbsp;Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria,&nbsp;Mohd Nizam Md Hashim,&nbsp;Michael Pak-Kai Wong,&nbsp;Zaidi Zakaria,&nbsp;Rosnelifaizur Ramely,&nbsp;Ahmad Shanwani Mohamed Sidek","doi":"10.3393/ac.2022.00227.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery have improved significantly over recent decades with lower recurrences and longer overall survival. However, many of the patients experienced low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This study identified the prevalence and risk factors associated with the development of LARS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved patients who were diagnosed with rectal cancer and had undergone sphincter-preserving low anterior resection from January 2011 to December 2020. Upon clinic follow-up, patients were asked to complete an interviewed based questionnaire (LARS score) designed to assess bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 76 patients, 25 patients (32.9%) had major LARS, 10 patients (13.2%) had minor LARS, and 41 patients (53.9%) had no LARS. The height of tumor from anal verge showed an association with the development of major LARS (P=0.039). Those patients with less than 8 cm tumor from anal verge had an increased risk of LARS by 3 times compared to those with 8 cm and above (adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-9.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results from our study show that low tumor height was a significant risk factor that has a negative impact on bowel function after surgery. The high prevalence of LARS emphasizes the need for study regarding risk factors and the importance of understanding the pathophysiology of LARS, in order for us to improve patient bowel function and quality of life after rectal cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626329/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00227.0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery have improved significantly over recent decades with lower recurrences and longer overall survival. However, many of the patients experienced low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This study identified the prevalence and risk factors associated with the development of LARS.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved patients who were diagnosed with rectal cancer and had undergone sphincter-preserving low anterior resection from January 2011 to December 2020. Upon clinic follow-up, patients were asked to complete an interviewed based questionnaire (LARS score) designed to assess bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.

Results: Out of 76 patients, 25 patients (32.9%) had major LARS, 10 patients (13.2%) had minor LARS, and 41 patients (53.9%) had no LARS. The height of tumor from anal verge showed an association with the development of major LARS (P=0.039). Those patients with less than 8 cm tumor from anal verge had an increased risk of LARS by 3 times compared to those with 8 cm and above (adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-9.13).

Conclusion: Results from our study show that low tumor height was a significant risk factor that has a negative impact on bowel function after surgery. The high prevalence of LARS emphasizes the need for study regarding risk factors and the importance of understanding the pathophysiology of LARS, in order for us to improve patient bowel function and quality of life after rectal cancer surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与低位前切除综合征相关的危险因素:一项横断面研究。
目的近几十年来,癌症直肠手术后的肿瘤结果显著改善,复发率较低,总生存期较长。然而,许多患者经历了低位前切除综合征(LARS)。本研究确定了与LARS发展相关的患病率和危险因素。方法本横断面研究涉及2011年1月至2020年12月诊断为癌症并接受乳头括约肌保留低位前切除术的患者。临床随访后,患者被要求完成一份基于访谈的问卷(LARS评分),该问卷旨在评估癌症直肠手术后的肠道功能障碍。结果76例患者中,25例(32.9%)有严重LARS,10例(13.2%)有轻微LARS,41例(53.9%)无LARS。肛门边缘肿瘤的高度与主要LARS的发生有关(P=0.039)。与8cm及以上的患者相比,肛门边缘肿瘤小于8cm的患者患LARS的风险增加了3倍(校正比值比为3.11;95%置信区间为1.06-9.13)对术后肠道功能有负面影响。LARS的高患病率强调了对危险因素进行研究的必要性以及了解LARS病理生理学的重要性,以便我们改善癌症直肠癌手术后患者的肠道功能和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
The management of complex fistula in ano by transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS): short-term results. Ileostomy volvulus as an underreported problem causing small bowel obstruction in patients living with ostomy: a case report and literature review. What can patients expect in the long term from radiofrequency thermocoagulation of hemorrhoids on bleeding, prolapse, quality of life, and recurrence: "no pain, no gain" or "no pain but a gain"? Garg scoring system to predict long-term healing in cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a prospective validation study. Benefits and risks of diverting stoma creation during rectal cancer surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1