Health Disparities in Liver Cancer: An Analysis of the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System

Robert B. Hood, R. Andridge, S. Sealy-Jefferson, A. Felix
{"title":"Health Disparities in Liver Cancer: An Analysis of the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System","authors":"Robert B. Hood, R. Andridge, S. Sealy-Jefferson, A. Felix","doi":"10.18061/ojph.v5i1.8514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We explored associations between neighborhood deprivation and tumor characteristics, treatment, and 5-year survival among primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in Ohio diagnosed between 2008 and 2016. \nMethods: We used data from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System and limited our analysis to adult (>18 years of age) HCC patients with known census tract information based on address at diagnosis. Using principal components analysis, we created a neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) using 9 census tract-level variables. We examined associations between tumor characteristics (stage and tumor size) and NDI quintile using chi-square tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Associations between guideline-concordant care and NDI using log-binomial regression adjusted for sex, race, age at diagnosis, metropolitan status, cancer stage, and year of diagnosis were conducted. For 5-year survival, we utilized Cox proportional hazards models with a similar adjustment set.\nResults: Neighborhood deprivation index was not associated with stage or tumor size. Individuals living in the most deprived neighborhoods were 16% less likely to receive guideline-concordant care as compared to individuals living in the least deprived neighborhoods (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.94). Similarly, individuals living in the most deprived neighborhoods were 15% less likely to survive 5 years compared to individuals living in the least deprived neighborhoods (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01-1.29). \nConclusion: Our results suggest a negative association between neighborhood deprivation on guideline-concordant care and survival among HCC patients. Interventions targeting disparities of HCC should focus not only on individual-level factors but address larger neighborhood level factors as well.","PeriodicalId":74337,"journal":{"name":"Ohio journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/ojph.v5i1.8514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We explored associations between neighborhood deprivation and tumor characteristics, treatment, and 5-year survival among primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in Ohio diagnosed between 2008 and 2016. Methods: We used data from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System and limited our analysis to adult (>18 years of age) HCC patients with known census tract information based on address at diagnosis. Using principal components analysis, we created a neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) using 9 census tract-level variables. We examined associations between tumor characteristics (stage and tumor size) and NDI quintile using chi-square tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Associations between guideline-concordant care and NDI using log-binomial regression adjusted for sex, race, age at diagnosis, metropolitan status, cancer stage, and year of diagnosis were conducted. For 5-year survival, we utilized Cox proportional hazards models with a similar adjustment set. Results: Neighborhood deprivation index was not associated with stage or tumor size. Individuals living in the most deprived neighborhoods were 16% less likely to receive guideline-concordant care as compared to individuals living in the least deprived neighborhoods (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.94). Similarly, individuals living in the most deprived neighborhoods were 15% less likely to survive 5 years compared to individuals living in the least deprived neighborhoods (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01-1.29). Conclusion: Our results suggest a negative association between neighborhood deprivation on guideline-concordant care and survival among HCC patients. Interventions targeting disparities of HCC should focus not only on individual-level factors but address larger neighborhood level factors as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症健康差异:俄亥俄州癌症发病监测系统分析
背景:我们探讨了俄亥俄州2008年至2016年间诊断的原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的邻里剥夺与肿瘤特征、治疗和5年生存率之间的关系。方法:我们使用俄亥俄州癌症发病率监测系统的数据,并将我们的分析局限于根据诊断地址具有已知普查区信息的成年(>18岁)HCC患者。使用主成分分析,我们使用9个人口普查区级别的变量创建了社区剥夺指数(NDI)。我们使用卡方检验和方差分析(ANOVA)检验了肿瘤特征(分期和肿瘤大小)与NDI五分位数之间的相关性。根据性别、种族、诊断时年龄、大都市状况、癌症分期和诊断年份,采用对数-细胞回归法,对基于指南的护理与NDI之间的关系进行了研究。对于5年生存率,我们使用了具有类似调整集的Cox比例风险模型。结果:邻里剥夺指数与肿瘤的分期或大小无关。与生活在最贫困社区的人相比,生活在最贫穷社区的人接受指南一致性护理的可能性降低了16%(调整后的患病率[PR]:0.84;95%置信区间[CI]:0.74-0.94)。同样,与生活在最贫困社区的人相比,生活在最贫穷社区的人存活5年的可能性降低了15%(调整后的危险比:1.15;95%置信区间:1.01-1.29)。针对HCC差异的干预措施不仅应关注个人层面的因素,还应关注更大的社区层面的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Issues in Ohio Availability and Characteristics of Hemp-Derived Psychoactive Cannabis Products: A Pilot Study in Cleveland, Ohio Application of The Healthy Migrant Theory to Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Data in Ohio How Can Public Health Professionals Help to Improve Mental Health for Students Using Distance Learning? Aging in Ohio: Trends and Preparation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1