A comparative study of a new subgrade model on beams with respect to FE and existing analytical models

A. Worku, Beza Tesfu
{"title":"A comparative study of a new subgrade model on beams with respect to FE and existing analytical models","authors":"A. Worku, Beza Tesfu","doi":"10.1080/17486025.2021.2006490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A variety of mechanical and continuum subgrade models ranging from the simplest Winkler model to the more complex ones were proposed in the past to address the problem of foundations on elastic subgrades. Most of them are based on simplifying assumptions. With the objective of arriving at a reliable few-parameter analytical model, two- and single-parameter mechanical equivalents of a rigorous continuum foundation model proposed by the first author are presented that are adjusted with respect to the finite-element (FE) software, PLAXIS. The performance of both variants of the model is tested on beams by comparing with other analytical models and with FE models for a range of variables. Both variants performed remarkably well, especially the two-parameter variant. The adjusted model parameters are provided for practical use. Adjustment factors are also established for the popular Vlasov’s model. Comparison between the proposed and FE models shows that Vlasov’s adjustment factor is sensitive and varies over a comparatively wide range, and the model even becomes unadjustable for short beams. In contrast, the proposed models consistently yield very good results for all ranges of beams with an adjustment factor that is less sensitive and varying within a narrow range confirming their good quality.","PeriodicalId":46470,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"65 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.2006490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT A variety of mechanical and continuum subgrade models ranging from the simplest Winkler model to the more complex ones were proposed in the past to address the problem of foundations on elastic subgrades. Most of them are based on simplifying assumptions. With the objective of arriving at a reliable few-parameter analytical model, two- and single-parameter mechanical equivalents of a rigorous continuum foundation model proposed by the first author are presented that are adjusted with respect to the finite-element (FE) software, PLAXIS. The performance of both variants of the model is tested on beams by comparing with other analytical models and with FE models for a range of variables. Both variants performed remarkably well, especially the two-parameter variant. The adjusted model parameters are provided for practical use. Adjustment factors are also established for the popular Vlasov’s model. Comparison between the proposed and FE models shows that Vlasov’s adjustment factor is sensitive and varies over a comparatively wide range, and the model even becomes unadjustable for short beams. In contrast, the proposed models consistently yield very good results for all ranges of beams with an adjustment factor that is less sensitive and varying within a narrow range confirming their good quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的梁上路基有限元模型与现有分析模型的比较研究
为了解决弹性地基上的基础问题,过去提出了各种力学和连续介质路基模型,从最简单的Winkler模型到更复杂的Winkler模型。其中大多数都是基于简化的假设。为了获得可靠的少参数分析模型,本文提出了由第一作者提出的严格连续体基础模型的双参数和单参数力学等效,并根据有限元(FE)软件PLAXIS进行了调整。通过与其他解析模型和一系列变量的有限元模型进行比较,对两种模型的性能进行了测试。两种变体都表现得非常好,尤其是双参数变体。调整后的模型参数可供实际应用。对流行的Vlasov模型也建立了调整因子。本文模型与有限元模型的比较表明,Vlasov调整因子具有较强的敏感性,且变化范围较宽,对于短光束模型甚至变得不可调。相比之下,所提出的模型对于所有范围的光束都一致地产生非常好的结果,调整因子的灵敏度较低,并且在较窄的范围内变化,证实了它们的良好质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Geomechanics is concerned with the application of the principle of mechanics to earth-materials (namely geo-material). Geoengineering covers a wide range of engineering disciplines related to geo-materials, such as foundation engineering, slope engineering, tunnelling, rock engineering, engineering geology and geo-environmental engineering. Geomechanics and Geoengineering is a major publication channel for research in the areas of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical and geological engineering, engineering geology, geo-environmental engineering and all geo-material related engineering and science disciplines. The Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of innovative ideas, especially between researchers in Asia and the rest of the world.
期刊最新文献
Analytical evaluation of partially stiffened granular piled raft with the effect of rigidity of bearing stratum A parametric study on deformation behaviour for design of braced excavation in soft clay Effect of leachate and used motor oil on the geotechnical and mechanical characteristics of soils with different mineralogy under different moisture conditions Influence of edge distance on experimental p-y curves for piles near slope Performance of loosely skirted square footing resting on reinforced sand under vertical concentric and eccentric loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1