AI oncology algorithm and dynamic real-world learning health care system for precision oncology.

I. Peták, C. Hegedűs, D. Tihanyi, R. Dóczi, P. Filotás, Attila Mate, M. Bacskai, R. Schwáb, I. Vályi-Nagy
{"title":"AI oncology algorithm and dynamic real-world learning health care system for precision oncology.","authors":"I. Peták, C. Hegedűs, D. Tihanyi, R. Dóczi, P. Filotás, Attila Mate, M. Bacskai, R. Schwáb, I. Vályi-Nagy","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"35 Background: Most tumours harbor multiple driver genetic alterations and many driver alterations are linked to multiple targeted therapies with various level of evidence. In addition, a specific treatment can be linked to multiple genetic alterations in the same tumor. Several public and private databases and software solutions are available to link driver alterations to treatments options, but in clinical practice of precision oncology we need a solution to select the right treatment for our patients based on the highest level of evidence also in case of complex molecular profiles. Methods: We have developed an AI oncology algorithm and rule-engine to prioritise treatment options for every cancer patient based on the individual molecular of their tumor. This IT solution can now prioritise 1200 compounds in clinical use or clinical development based on the computing of 24,000 evidence-based associations (“rules”) between drivers, targets and compounds. The software calculates a numeric score, the “aggregated evidence level” for each driver alterations and compounds. We have linked this decision support software to a dynamic patient case management system, which records responds to therapy to create learning system to provide dynamic decision support through several lines of therapies of each patient and to use real-life evidence to further improve the algorithm. Results: Our first results indicate that system allows individualised decision of diagnostic option between single gene tests to comprehensive 600 gene NGS panels and identification of actionable alterations in 83% of cancer cases. Conclusions: This system can be a first working solution to standardise clinical decisions precision oncology, which also helps the real-life evaluation of novel multigene molecular diagnostic tests and therapies to find their best indications and accelerate their reimbursement by insurance companies and national health funds.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

35 Background: Most tumours harbor multiple driver genetic alterations and many driver alterations are linked to multiple targeted therapies with various level of evidence. In addition, a specific treatment can be linked to multiple genetic alterations in the same tumor. Several public and private databases and software solutions are available to link driver alterations to treatments options, but in clinical practice of precision oncology we need a solution to select the right treatment for our patients based on the highest level of evidence also in case of complex molecular profiles. Methods: We have developed an AI oncology algorithm and rule-engine to prioritise treatment options for every cancer patient based on the individual molecular of their tumor. This IT solution can now prioritise 1200 compounds in clinical use or clinical development based on the computing of 24,000 evidence-based associations (“rules”) between drivers, targets and compounds. The software calculates a numeric score, the “aggregated evidence level” for each driver alterations and compounds. We have linked this decision support software to a dynamic patient case management system, which records responds to therapy to create learning system to provide dynamic decision support through several lines of therapies of each patient and to use real-life evidence to further improve the algorithm. Results: Our first results indicate that system allows individualised decision of diagnostic option between single gene tests to comprehensive 600 gene NGS panels and identification of actionable alterations in 83% of cancer cases. Conclusions: This system can be a first working solution to standardise clinical decisions precision oncology, which also helps the real-life evaluation of novel multigene molecular diagnostic tests and therapies to find their best indications and accelerate their reimbursement by insurance companies and national health funds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI肿瘤学算法和用于精确肿瘤学的动态真实世界学习医疗保健系统。
背景:大多数肿瘤含有多种驱动基因改变,许多驱动基因改变与多种靶向治疗有关,证据水平不一。此外,一种特定的治疗方法可能与同一肿瘤中的多种基因改变有关。有几个公共和私人数据库和软件解决方案可以将驱动因素的改变与治疗方案联系起来,但在精确肿瘤学的临床实践中,我们需要一个解决方案,在复杂分子谱的情况下,根据最高水平的证据为患者选择正确的治疗方案。方法:我们开发了一种人工智能肿瘤学算法和规则引擎,根据每个癌症患者的肿瘤个体分子来优先考虑治疗方案。该IT解决方案现在可以根据驱动因素、靶点和化合物之间24000种循证关联(“规则”)的计算,对1200种临床使用或临床开发的化合物进行优先排序。该软件计算出一个数字分数,即每个司机的改变和混合的“综合证据水平”。我们将该决策支持软件与动态患者病例管理系统联系起来,该系统记录对治疗的反应,创建学习系统,通过每个患者的几条治疗线提供动态决策支持,并使用现实证据进一步改进算法。结果:我们的第一个结果表明,该系统可以在单基因测试和综合600个基因NGS面板之间做出个性化的诊断选择,并在83%的癌症病例中识别出可操作的改变。结论:该系统可作为规范精准肿瘤学临床决策的首个工作解决方案,也有助于新型多基因分子诊断检测和治疗的现实评估,找到其最佳适应症,加快其被保险公司和国家卫生基金报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
期刊最新文献
Expanding Coverage of Oncology Drugs in an Aging, Upper-Middle-Income Country: Analyses of Public and Private Expenditures in Chile. Patterns of Care of Cancers and Radiotherapy in Ethiopia. Identifying and Prioritizing Family Education Needs at Pediatric Oncology Centers in Central America and Mexico. Does Interim PET Scan After 2 Cycles of ABVD Predict Outcome in Hodgkin Lymphoma? Real-World Evidence. Pattern of Presentation of Patients With Breast Cancer in Iraq in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1