Safety profile of multilevel outpatient cervical disc arthroplasty

Jonathan S. Markowitz, Wesley Bronson, Samuel K. Cho
{"title":"Safety profile of multilevel outpatient cervical disc arthroplasty","authors":"Jonathan S. Markowitz,&nbsp;Wesley Bronson,&nbsp;Samuel K. Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.semss.2023.101013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Efforts are underway to shift an increasing number of procedures to outpatient procedures. The literature has demonstrated high rates of safety, cost savings and patient satisfaction for various spine procedures performed in the outpatient setting. Cervical Disc Arthroplasty<span> (CDA) has become an acceptable surgical treatment option for cervical myelopathy and or </span></span>radiculopathy. While this procedure has been shown to be safe when performed in an inpatient setting, the safety of performing multilevel CDA in the outpatient setting requires careful assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><p>We searched the Pubmed database using following search keywords: “cervical disc replacement,” “cervical disc arthroplasty,” “multilevel,” “outpatient,” “ambulatory.” Four retrospective cohort studies and one meta-analysis were identified and relevant to the topic. The literature was critically evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multilevel CDA can be safely performed in the outpatient setting, with lower complication rates, shorter operating times, and similar readmission and reoperation rates compared with inpatient CDA. When choosing to perform this procedure in the ambulatory setting each surgeon should consider their own skill set and familiarity with CDA. While no evidence-based guidelines exist regarding which patients are optimal candidates to perform this procedure on in the outpatient setting, careful patient selection is important. Further prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes are needed to generate evidence-based protocols for patient selection in order to optimize outcomes and the safety of performing multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty in the outpatient setting.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>V</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39884,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"Article 101013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738323000072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Efforts are underway to shift an increasing number of procedures to outpatient procedures. The literature has demonstrated high rates of safety, cost savings and patient satisfaction for various spine procedures performed in the outpatient setting. Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) has become an acceptable surgical treatment option for cervical myelopathy and or radiculopathy. While this procedure has been shown to be safe when performed in an inpatient setting, the safety of performing multilevel CDA in the outpatient setting requires careful assessment.

Methods and Results

We searched the Pubmed database using following search keywords: “cervical disc replacement,” “cervical disc arthroplasty,” “multilevel,” “outpatient,” “ambulatory.” Four retrospective cohort studies and one meta-analysis were identified and relevant to the topic. The literature was critically evaluated.

Conclusion

Multilevel CDA can be safely performed in the outpatient setting, with lower complication rates, shorter operating times, and similar readmission and reoperation rates compared with inpatient CDA. When choosing to perform this procedure in the ambulatory setting each surgeon should consider their own skill set and familiarity with CDA. While no evidence-based guidelines exist regarding which patients are optimal candidates to perform this procedure on in the outpatient setting, careful patient selection is important. Further prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes are needed to generate evidence-based protocols for patient selection in order to optimize outcomes and the safety of performing multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty in the outpatient setting.

Level of Evidence

V

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多层门诊颈椎间盘置换术的安全性
背景正在努力将越来越多的手术转移到门诊手术。文献表明,在门诊环境中进行的各种脊柱手术具有较高的安全性、成本节约和患者满意度。颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)已成为治疗脊髓型和/或神经根型颈椎病的一种可接受的手术选择。虽然该程序已被证明在住院环境中进行是安全的,但在门诊环境中进行多级CDA的安全性需要仔细评估。方法和结果我们使用以下搜索关键词搜索Pubmed数据库:“颈椎间盘置换术”、“颈椎间盘中置换术”,“多水平”、“门诊”和“门诊”。确定了四项回顾性队列研究和一项荟萃分析,并与该主题相关。对文献进行了批判性评价。结论与住院CDA相比,多水平CDA在门诊环境中可以安全地进行,并发症发生率更低,手术时间更短,再次入院和再次手术率相似。当选择在门诊环境中进行该手术时,每个外科医生都应该考虑自己的技能和对CDA的熟悉程度。虽然没有基于证据的指南来确定哪些患者是在门诊环境中进行该手术的最佳人选,但仔细选择患者很重要。需要进一步的具有更大样本量的前瞻性随机研究,以制定基于证据的患者选择方案,从而优化在门诊环境中进行多级颈椎间盘置换术的结果和安全性。证据级别V
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Spine Surgery
Seminars in Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
2 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Spine Surgery is a continuing source of current, clinical information for practicing surgeons. Under the direction of a specially selected guest editor, each issue addresses a single topic in the management and care of patients. Topics covered in each issue include basic anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management options and follow-up of the condition under consideration. The journal also features "Spinescope," a special section providing summaries of articles from other journals that are of relevance to the understanding of ongoing research related to the treatment of spinal disorders.
期刊最新文献
Contributors to authors Operative and non-operative options for benign primary spine tumors Wound complications following spine tumor surgery: Risk factors and prevention Update on the management of extradural primary pediatric spinal tumors Interventional radiology procedures for metastatic spine tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1