Exploring “ownership” of Irish traditional dance music: Heritage or property?

IF 0.6 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Cultural Property Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1017/S094073912200011X
Luke McDonagh
{"title":"Exploring “ownership” of Irish traditional dance music: Heritage or property?","authors":"Luke McDonagh","doi":"10.1017/S094073912200011X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Dance has rarely been accepted as the subject of copyright protection because works of dance and choreography have lacked commodified property-object status in intellectual property law. If dance is “haunted by its own ephemerality” and, thus, rarely embodied as property, then what of dance music? Music composed, performed, and recorded with a dance audience in mind has formed, on many occasions, the subject matter of intellectual property law claims, as the rancorous recent litigation over the nightclub (and online-streaming) hit “Blurred Lines” demonstrates. In this article, I utilize the case study of traditional Irish dance music to explore how traditional music occupies a space somewhat outside the formal legal system, defined by informal social norms such as reciprocity, sharing, and acknowledgment (attribution). I consider how Irish traditional music can be represented as heritage and as property, reflecting on the type of ownership at play in the Irish traditional music community. I observe that Irish traditional dance music provides an example of “heritage as resistance” – a mode of cultural and social practice that continues to thrive as a living tradition, even in the contemporary market-oriented world of the global North.","PeriodicalId":54155,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cultural Property","volume":"29 1","pages":"183 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cultural Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S094073912200011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Dance has rarely been accepted as the subject of copyright protection because works of dance and choreography have lacked commodified property-object status in intellectual property law. If dance is “haunted by its own ephemerality” and, thus, rarely embodied as property, then what of dance music? Music composed, performed, and recorded with a dance audience in mind has formed, on many occasions, the subject matter of intellectual property law claims, as the rancorous recent litigation over the nightclub (and online-streaming) hit “Blurred Lines” demonstrates. In this article, I utilize the case study of traditional Irish dance music to explore how traditional music occupies a space somewhat outside the formal legal system, defined by informal social norms such as reciprocity, sharing, and acknowledgment (attribution). I consider how Irish traditional music can be represented as heritage and as property, reflecting on the type of ownership at play in the Irish traditional music community. I observe that Irish traditional dance music provides an example of “heritage as resistance” – a mode of cultural and social practice that continues to thrive as a living tradition, even in the contemporary market-oriented world of the global North.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索爱尔兰传统舞蹈音乐的“所有权”:遗产还是财产?
摘要舞蹈作品在知识产权法中缺乏商品产权客体的地位,因此很少被接受为著作权保护的主体。如果舞蹈“被自己的短暂性所困扰”,因此很少被体现为财产,那么舞蹈音乐呢?在许多情况下,为舞蹈观众创作、表演和录制的音乐已经形成了知识产权法主张的主题,就像最近对夜总会(和在线流媒体)热门歌曲“模糊线”的恶意诉讼一样。在这篇文章中,我利用传统爱尔兰舞蹈音乐的案例研究来探索传统音乐是如何在正式法律体系之外占据一个空间的,这个空间是由非正式的社会规范(如互惠、分享和承认(归属))定义的。我考虑爱尔兰传统音乐是如何作为遗产和财产来表现的,反映了爱尔兰传统音乐界的所有权类型。我注意到,爱尔兰传统舞蹈音乐提供了一个“作为抵抗的遗产”的例子——一种文化和社会实践模式,即使在当今全球北方以市场为导向的世界中,也作为一种活的传统继续蓬勃发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cultural Property
International Journal of Cultural Property HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Different Materialities – Different Authenticities? Considerations on Watercraft Exhibited in Museums Learning and Knowledge Loss: Returning Antiquities from Fordham University to Italy Are Archaeologists Talking About Looting? Reviewing Archaeological and Anthropological Conference Proceedings from 1899–2019 How to Be a ‘Good’ Collector: Some Ethical Reflections on the Private Collecting of Cultural Heritage T. rex is Fierce, T. rex is Charismatic, T. rex is Litigious: Disruptive Objects in Affective Desirescapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1