From critique to reaction: The new right, critical theory and international relations

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of International Political Theory Pub Date : 2021-05-28 DOI:10.1177/17550882211020409
J. Drolet, Michael C. Williams
{"title":"From critique to reaction: The new right, critical theory and international relations","authors":"J. Drolet, Michael C. Williams","doi":"10.1177/17550882211020409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across the globe, radical conservative political forces and ideas are influencing and even transforming the landscape of international politics. Yet IR is remarkably ill-equipped to understand and engage these new challenges. Unlike political theory or domestic political analyses, conservatism has no distinctive place in the fields’ defining alternatives of realism, liberalism, Marxism, and constructivism. This paper seeks to provide a point of entry for such engagement by bringing together what may seem the most unlikely of partners: critical theory and the New Right. Important parts of today’s New Right represent self-conscious appropriations of Critical themes and thinkers—turning them to self-declared “reactionary” ends. Developing outside the confines of the academy, these forms of thought have woven insights from across Critical theory into new and mobilizing forms of conservative ideology, seeking to link that ideology to social forces that play increasingly active roles in global politics. Our intention here is not to somehow blame Critical perspectives for the ideas of the New Right, either directly or by association. Rather, we seek to show how an engagement with Critical theory helps us understand the New Right, while also demonstrating some of the direct challenges the New Right poses for critical perspectives.","PeriodicalId":44237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Political Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17550882211020409","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882211020409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Across the globe, radical conservative political forces and ideas are influencing and even transforming the landscape of international politics. Yet IR is remarkably ill-equipped to understand and engage these new challenges. Unlike political theory or domestic political analyses, conservatism has no distinctive place in the fields’ defining alternatives of realism, liberalism, Marxism, and constructivism. This paper seeks to provide a point of entry for such engagement by bringing together what may seem the most unlikely of partners: critical theory and the New Right. Important parts of today’s New Right represent self-conscious appropriations of Critical themes and thinkers—turning them to self-declared “reactionary” ends. Developing outside the confines of the academy, these forms of thought have woven insights from across Critical theory into new and mobilizing forms of conservative ideology, seeking to link that ideology to social forces that play increasingly active roles in global politics. Our intention here is not to somehow blame Critical perspectives for the ideas of the New Right, either directly or by association. Rather, we seek to show how an engagement with Critical theory helps us understand the New Right, while also demonstrating some of the direct challenges the New Right poses for critical perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从批判到反动:新右派、批判理论与国际关系
在全球范围内,激进保守的政治力量和思想正在影响甚至改变国际政治格局。然而,在理解和应对这些新挑战方面,IR的装备明显不足。与政治理论或国内政治分析不同,保守主义在定义现实主义、自由主义、马克思主义和建构主义的替代方案方面没有独特的地位。本文试图通过汇集看似最不可能的合作伙伴:批判理论和新右翼,为这种接触提供一个切入点。今天新右派的重要组成部分代表了对批判主题和思想家的自觉挪用——将它们转向自我宣称的“反动”目的。这些思想形式在学术范围之外发展,将批判理论的见解编织成新的、可动员的保守意识形态形式,试图将这种意识形态与在全球政治中发挥日益积极作用的社会力量联系起来。在这里,我们的意图不是以某种方式将新右派的思想归咎于批判观点,无论是直接的还是连带的。相反,我们试图展示与批判理论的接触如何帮助我们理解新右翼,同时也展示了新右翼对批判观点提出的一些直接挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The global dimension of domestic regulatory agencies: Why do we need a networked perspective of political legitimacy? Arguing and bargaining in international forums: The need for a novel approach The peace/violence nexus: Fundamental, multiple, contingent Dialectical Insights for Global IR: Forum on Snapshots from Home Buddhism, quantum theory and international relations: On the strength of the subject, the discontinuous relationality, and the world of contingency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1