Perbandingan Monstrositas Kriminal dalam Red Dragon (1981) Karya Thomas Harris dan Hannibal (2015) Serial Televisi NBC

Fitria Zahrina Putri
{"title":"Perbandingan Monstrositas Kriminal dalam Red Dragon (1981) Karya Thomas Harris dan Hannibal (2015) Serial Televisi NBC","authors":"Fitria Zahrina Putri","doi":"10.24257/ATAVISME.V21I2.457.164-179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reveal how differences in criminal monstrosity are portrayed in Red Dragon novel (1981), with the adaptation of his television series titled Hannibal (2013). The problem discussed is the blurred norms as the form of criminal monstrosity development in Hannibal. The theory used is the criminal monstrosity developed by Alexa Wright (2013). This research uses analytical descriptive method. Data from novels and television series are described and compared to get the grand concept of criminal monstrosity. The results showed that the blurred norms in Hannibal can be seen through normalization of cannibalism by using culinary aesthetic,  the role of Will Graham from FBI to Hannibal’s crime partner, and  a more intimate relationship between Will and Hannibal. These blurred norms created a new monstrosity narrative: a monstrous criminal nature behind a person who looks normal and able to function properly in society.","PeriodicalId":55790,"journal":{"name":"Atavisme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atavisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24257/ATAVISME.V21I2.457.164-179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to reveal how differences in criminal monstrosity are portrayed in Red Dragon novel (1981), with the adaptation of his television series titled Hannibal (2013). The problem discussed is the blurred norms as the form of criminal monstrosity development in Hannibal. The theory used is the criminal monstrosity developed by Alexa Wright (2013). This research uses analytical descriptive method. Data from novels and television series are described and compared to get the grand concept of criminal monstrosity. The results showed that the blurred norms in Hannibal can be seen through normalization of cannibalism by using culinary aesthetic,  the role of Will Graham from FBI to Hannibal’s crime partner, and  a more intimate relationship between Will and Hannibal. These blurred norms created a new monstrosity narrative: a monstrous criminal nature behind a person who looks normal and able to function properly in society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托马斯·哈里斯(Thomas Harris)和汉尼拔(Hannibal)(2015)的《红龙》(1981)中的犯罪怪物比较
本研究旨在揭示红龙小说(1981年)中犯罪怪物的差异是如何被描绘的,该小说改编自他的电视连续剧《汉尼拔》(2013年)。所讨论的问题是作为汉尼拔犯罪怪物发展形式的模糊规范。所使用的理论是Alexa Wright(2013)提出的犯罪怪物。本研究采用分析描述性方法。对小说和电视连续剧中的数据进行描述和比较,以获得犯罪怪物的宏大概念。结果表明,《汉尼拔》中模糊的规范可以通过烹饪美学对食人行为的规范化、从联邦调查局到汉尼拔犯罪伙伴的威尔·格雷厄姆的角色,以及威尔和汉尼拔之间更亲密的关系来看出。这些模糊的规范创造了一种新的怪物叙事:一个看起来正常、能够在社会中正常运作的人背后有着可怕的犯罪性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
DISTOPIA DALAM NOVEL TERJEMAHAN THE LONG WALK KARYA STEPHEN KING (KAJIAN PSIKOLOGI ABNORMAL DAVISON) PERTENTANGAN KELAS SOSIAL DALAM MASYARAKAT BELITONG PADA NOVEL LASKAR PELANGI KARYA ANDREA HIRATA: ANALISIS TEORI MARXISME RADIKALISASI MAKNA PEREMPUAN JAWA DALAM ”NGAMEN LIMA”: SUATU ANALISIS DEKONSTRUKSI INOVASI DAN KONVENSI TEATER TRADISIONAL BANYUWANGI The Impact of Instability of Gossip’s Meaning to The characterizations in Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton: The Duke and I Novel: A Derridean Deconstruction Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1