Cricopharyngeal myotomy and toxin botulinum injection for the treatment of upper esophageal sphincter disorders: a narrative review

F. Laxague, F. Herbella, F. Schlottmann
{"title":"Cricopharyngeal myotomy and toxin botulinum injection for the treatment of upper esophageal sphincter disorders: a narrative review","authors":"F. Laxague, F. Herbella, F. Schlottmann","doi":"10.21037/AOE-21-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To assess the indications, safety, and results of cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM) and toxin botulinum injection (TBI) for the treatment of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) abnormalities. The UES disorders can provoke overwhelming consequences such as bronchopulmonary aspiration, malnutrition, impaired quality of life or even death. The best treatment modality for UES disorders remains unclear. The purpose of this review was to assess indications and outcomes of CPM and TBI for the treatment of UES abnormalities. We performed a review of the literature regarding the outcomes of CPM and TBI for UES disorders. All articles between 1990 and 2020 describing CPM, TBI, or those comparing both techniques were analyzed. Treatment indications, safety, and outcomes of both procedures were evaluated as primary endpoints. Quality of life improvement was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Outcomes after CPM and TBI for UES disorders are heterogeneously reported. Data suggest that both surgical and endoscopic CPM are safe and have encouraging long-lasting results in terms of symptoms relief and quality of life improvement. TBI is also a safe procedure, with good but temporary postoperative results. Current data are heterogeneous and show that both CPM and TBI are safe and effective treatment modalities for UES disorders. Better long-lasting effects, however, seem to be achieved with CPM.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-21-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: To assess the indications, safety, and results of cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM) and toxin botulinum injection (TBI) for the treatment of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) abnormalities. The UES disorders can provoke overwhelming consequences such as bronchopulmonary aspiration, malnutrition, impaired quality of life or even death. The best treatment modality for UES disorders remains unclear. The purpose of this review was to assess indications and outcomes of CPM and TBI for the treatment of UES abnormalities. We performed a review of the literature regarding the outcomes of CPM and TBI for UES disorders. All articles between 1990 and 2020 describing CPM, TBI, or those comparing both techniques were analyzed. Treatment indications, safety, and outcomes of both procedures were evaluated as primary endpoints. Quality of life improvement was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Outcomes after CPM and TBI for UES disorders are heterogeneously reported. Data suggest that both surgical and endoscopic CPM are safe and have encouraging long-lasting results in terms of symptoms relief and quality of life improvement. TBI is also a safe procedure, with good but temporary postoperative results. Current data are heterogeneous and show that both CPM and TBI are safe and effective treatment modalities for UES disorders. Better long-lasting effects, however, seem to be achieved with CPM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咽下肌切开术和肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗食管上括约肌疾病:叙述性综述
目的:评价环咽肌切开术(CPM)和肉毒杆菌毒素注射(TBI)治疗食管上括约肌(UES)异常的适应症、安全性和结果。UES疾病可引起严重后果,如支气管肺误吸、营养不良、生活质量受损甚至死亡。UES疾病的最佳治疗方式尚不清楚。本综述的目的是评估CPM和TBI治疗UES异常的适应症和结果。我们对CPM和TBI治疗UES疾病的结果进行了文献回顾。分析了1990年至2020年间描述CPM、TBI或比较这两种技术的所有文章。两种治疗方法的适应症、安全性和结果作为主要终点进行评估。生活质量改善作为次要终点进行评估。CPM和TBI治疗UES疾病的结果报道不一。数据表明,手术和内窥镜CPM都是安全的,并且在症状缓解和生活质量改善方面具有令人鼓舞的持久效果。TBI也是一种安全的手术,术后效果良好,但只是暂时的。目前的数据是不一致的,表明CPM和TBI都是UES疾病安全有效的治疗方式。然而,CPM似乎取得了更好的持久效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1