Clinical Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Biolaser Versus Ozone Therapy in Reducing Chronic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Three-Month Follow-Up Study

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Iranian Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI:10.5812/iranjradiol-129700
Saeed Keshmiri, Meysam Velayati, S. Momenzadeh
{"title":"Clinical Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Biolaser Versus Ozone Therapy in Reducing Chronic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Three-Month Follow-Up Study","authors":"Saeed Keshmiri, Meysam Velayati, S. Momenzadeh","doi":"10.5812/iranjradiol-129700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Biolaser is an emerging technology, which has attracted the attention of many surgeons and specialists in different medical fields. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided biolaser radiation versus ozone therapy in reducing chronic pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis during a three-month follow-up. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients referring to pain clinic of Shohadaye-Tajrish and Akhtar hospitals in 2017, were included in this randomized single-blind clinical trial study. According to a randomized table of numbers, in Biolaser group (n = 30): 10 mL of normal saline + 5 mL of lidocaine 1% + BioLaser + Physical Therapy and in the Ozone group (n = 30), received 10 mL Ozone (30 mic/mL) plus 5 mL lidocaine 1% + BioLaser placebo + Physical Therapy received. The patients were evaluated for pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and knee function with Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questioner. The patients were followed up 4 & 12 weeks and reviewed at weeks 12 after the injection by an observer who was unaware of the groups (IRCT20111121008146N15). Results: Comparison of the mean age (56.8 ± 8.5 years in the biolaser group vs. 51.5 ± 5.4 years in the ozone therapy group; P = 0.721) and body mass index (31.1 ± 3.4 kg/m2 in the biolaser group vs. 30.5 ± 2.6 kg/m2 in the ozone therapy group; P = 0.214) did not indicate any significant differences between the two groups. The pain severity decreased significantly at different times in the biolaser and ozone therapy groups (P = 0.018). The knee pressure sensitivity score was 1.3 ± 0.5 in the biolaser group and 1.6 ± 0.4 in the ozone therapy group at 12 weeks post-treatment (P = 0.037). The knee circumference was also 35.6 ± 3.0 cm in the biolaser group and 39.7 ± 3.9 cm in the ozone therapy group at 12 weeks post-treatment (P = 0.032). The KOOS performance score was 46.9 ± 9.4 in the biolaser group and 49.3 ± 7.9 in the ozone therapy group (P = 0.187). Besides, the KOOS quality of life score was 10 ± 1.3 in the biolaser group and 10.4 ± 1.5 in the ozone therapy group (P = 0.586). Conclusion: Biolaser therapy under ultrasound guidance was found to be a safe, non-invasive, and effective method, which could improve chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis during a three-month follow-up.","PeriodicalId":50273,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-129700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biolaser is an emerging technology, which has attracted the attention of many surgeons and specialists in different medical fields. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided biolaser radiation versus ozone therapy in reducing chronic pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis during a three-month follow-up. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients referring to pain clinic of Shohadaye-Tajrish and Akhtar hospitals in 2017, were included in this randomized single-blind clinical trial study. According to a randomized table of numbers, in Biolaser group (n = 30): 10 mL of normal saline + 5 mL of lidocaine 1% + BioLaser + Physical Therapy and in the Ozone group (n = 30), received 10 mL Ozone (30 mic/mL) plus 5 mL lidocaine 1% + BioLaser placebo + Physical Therapy received. The patients were evaluated for pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and knee function with Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questioner. The patients were followed up 4 & 12 weeks and reviewed at weeks 12 after the injection by an observer who was unaware of the groups (IRCT20111121008146N15). Results: Comparison of the mean age (56.8 ± 8.5 years in the biolaser group vs. 51.5 ± 5.4 years in the ozone therapy group; P = 0.721) and body mass index (31.1 ± 3.4 kg/m2 in the biolaser group vs. 30.5 ± 2.6 kg/m2 in the ozone therapy group; P = 0.214) did not indicate any significant differences between the two groups. The pain severity decreased significantly at different times in the biolaser and ozone therapy groups (P = 0.018). The knee pressure sensitivity score was 1.3 ± 0.5 in the biolaser group and 1.6 ± 0.4 in the ozone therapy group at 12 weeks post-treatment (P = 0.037). The knee circumference was also 35.6 ± 3.0 cm in the biolaser group and 39.7 ± 3.9 cm in the ozone therapy group at 12 weeks post-treatment (P = 0.032). The KOOS performance score was 46.9 ± 9.4 in the biolaser group and 49.3 ± 7.9 in the ozone therapy group (P = 0.187). Besides, the KOOS quality of life score was 10 ± 1.3 in the biolaser group and 10.4 ± 1.5 in the ozone therapy group (P = 0.586). Conclusion: Biolaser therapy under ultrasound guidance was found to be a safe, non-invasive, and effective method, which could improve chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis during a three-month follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导生物激光与臭氧治疗减轻膝骨关节炎慢性疼痛的临床疗效:三个月随访研究
背景:生物激光是一项新兴技术,已经引起了许多外科医生和不同医学领域专家的关注。目的:本研究旨在评估超声引导生物激光照射与臭氧治疗在减轻膝骨关节炎患者慢性疼痛方面的临床效果,为期三个月的随访。患者与方法:选取2017年在Shohadaye-Tajrish和Akhtar医院疼痛门诊就诊的60例患者进行随机单盲临床研究。根据随机数字表,Biolaser组(n = 30):生理盐水10 mL + 1%利多卡因5 mL + Biolaser +物理治疗;Ozone组(n = 30):臭氧10 mL (30 mic/mL) + 1%利多卡因5 mL + Biolaser安慰剂+物理治疗。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和膝关节功能评分法(膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分法(oos))对患者进行疼痛评估。患者随访4周和12周,并在注射后12周由不知道组的观察员(IRCT20111121008146N15)进行复查。结果:生物激光治疗组平均年龄(56.8±8.5岁)与臭氧治疗组平均年龄(51.5±5.4岁)比较;P = 0.721),体重指数(生物激光组31.1±3.4 kg/m2 vs臭氧组30.5±2.6 kg/m2);P = 0.214),两组间无显著差异。生物激光治疗组和臭氧治疗组不同时间疼痛程度均明显减轻(P = 0.018)。治疗后12周,生物激光组膝关节压敏评分为1.3±0.5分,臭氧组为1.6±0.4分(P = 0.037)。治疗后12周,生物激光组膝关节围度为35.6±3.0 cm,臭氧组为39.7±3.9 cm (P = 0.032)。生物激光治疗组的KOOS评分为46.9±9.4分,臭氧治疗组为49.3±7.9分(P = 0.187)。生物激光治疗组的KOOS生活质量评分为10±1.3分,臭氧治疗组的KOOS生活质量评分为10.4±1.5分(P = 0.586)。结论:超声引导下的生物激光治疗是一种安全、无创、有效的治疗方法,在三个月的随访中可以改善膝关节骨性关节炎的慢性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Iranian Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Radiology is the official journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Iranian Society of Radiology. It is a scientific forum dedicated primarily to the topics relevant to radiology and allied sciences of the developing countries, which have been neglected or have received little attention in the Western medical literature. This journal particularly welcomes manuscripts which deal with radiology and imaging from geographic regions wherein problems regarding economic, social, ethnic and cultural parameters affecting prevalence and course of the illness are taken into consideration. The Iranian Journal of Radiology has been launched in order to interchange information in the field of radiology and other related scientific spheres. In accordance with the objective of developing the scientific ability of the radiological population and other related scientific fields, this journal publishes research articles, evidence-based review articles, and case reports focused on regional tropics. Iranian Journal of Radiology operates in agreement with the below principles in compliance with continuous quality improvement: 1-Increasing the satisfaction of the readers, authors, staff, and co-workers. 2-Improving the scientific content and appearance of the journal. 3-Advancing the scientific validity of the journal both nationally and internationally. Such basics are accomplished only by aggregative effort and reciprocity of the radiological population and related sciences, authorities, and staff of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Application of Elastography in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis (IGM): A Systematic Review Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatic Metastasis of Solitary Fibrous Tumor: Report of Five Patients Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Findings of Intracranial Chondroma and Chondrosarcoma with a Non-Skull Base Origin: A Report of Two Cases Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Characteristics and Dimensions of Calcified Plaques and Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Improvement of Bone Age Assessment Using a Deep Learning Model in Young Children: Significance of Carpal Bone Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1