Struggle over employees psychological well-being. The politization and depolitization of the debate on employee mental health in the Finnish insurance sector

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2020.1845741
A. Kuokkanen, Pekka Varje, A. Väänänen
{"title":"Struggle over employees psychological well-being. The politization and depolitization of the debate on employee mental health in the Finnish insurance sector","authors":"A. Kuokkanen, Pekka Varje, A. Väänänen","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2020.1845741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the emergence and evolution of the discourse on mental health problems as an occupational health risk in the professional debates among Finnish insurance workers from a historical perspective. Our findings indicate that the mental health discourse was influenced by organizational, cultural and political changes. We also found that the employee’s role and the power relations in the insurance sector influenced the way in which mental health problems were articulated in professional debates. The workplace democratization movement of the 1970s and the increasing power of trade unions paved the way for the recognition and manifestation of employees’ mental ill-health and vice versa, the increase of mental health problems legitimized the activity of the union. In the 1990s and 2000s, however, the individualization trend led to the view that employees themselves were responsible for maintaining and regulating their own mental health and competitiveness, once again limiting their opportunities to express their grievances at the workplace and undermining the solidarity between employees.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"15 1","pages":"252 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2020.1845741","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2020.1845741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the emergence and evolution of the discourse on mental health problems as an occupational health risk in the professional debates among Finnish insurance workers from a historical perspective. Our findings indicate that the mental health discourse was influenced by organizational, cultural and political changes. We also found that the employee’s role and the power relations in the insurance sector influenced the way in which mental health problems were articulated in professional debates. The workplace democratization movement of the 1970s and the increasing power of trade unions paved the way for the recognition and manifestation of employees’ mental ill-health and vice versa, the increase of mental health problems legitimized the activity of the union. In the 1990s and 2000s, however, the individualization trend led to the view that employees themselves were responsible for maintaining and regulating their own mental health and competitiveness, once again limiting their opportunities to express their grievances at the workplace and undermining the solidarity between employees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
努力维护员工的心理健康。关于芬兰保险部门雇员心理健康的辩论政治化和非政治化
摘要:本文从历史的角度考察了芬兰保险工作者专业辩论中关于精神健康问题作为职业健康风险的话语的出现和演变。我们的研究结果表明,心理健康话语受到组织、文化和政治变化的影响。我们还发现,雇员在保险部门的角色和权力关系影响了在专业辩论中阐述心理健康问题的方式。20世纪70年代的工作场所民主化运动和工会力量的增强为承认和显示雇员的精神不健康状况铺平了道路,反之亦然,精神健康问题的增加使工会的活动合法化。然而,在20世纪90年代和21世纪初,个性化趋势导致员工认为自己有责任维护和调节自己的心理健康和竞争力,再次限制了他们在工作场所表达不满的机会,破坏了员工之间的团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
The history of entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom: 1860-2020 Family entrepreneurs and their next generations, 1809–1945: educational pathways of business elite in Finland Who watches the watchdogs? Central bank board members and banking supervisors in Switzerland (1907–2008) Informing the ontologies of organizational histories: the critical conceptualization of events and actualization in organizing Who determined the rules of the game in the Spanish financial reforms, 1970-1990?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1