Knowledge/Power in (Post)Colonial India 1870–1920: Indian Political Economy as Counter-Knowledge and the Transformation of the Colonial Order

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 Social Sciences Sociologus Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.3790/SOC.67.1.83
Katja Rieck
{"title":"Knowledge/Power in (Post)Colonial India 1870–1920: Indian Political Economy as Counter-Knowledge and the Transformation of the Colonial Order","authors":"Katja Rieck","doi":"10.3790/SOC.67.1.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the late 19th and early 20th centuries South Asian intellectuals began to develop a specifically Indian political economy – ostensibly grounded in Indigenous interests, values, norms, knowledge systems, and practices – as a response to the failure of the British colonial government to bring ‘moral and material improvement’ to the subcontinent. The article examines the relationship between colonial knowledge/power and the anti-hegemonic project of an Indian political economy, which claims to assert ‘Indigenous’ knowledge as counter-knowledge, but continues to share the same discursive space as orthodox political economy. The contribution explores how the alterity and indigeneity of Indian political economy was justfied and discusses the power relations in which the legitimacy of this alterity was enmeshed. Finally, the article analyses the limits set to the emancipatory impetus of such an ‘indigenous, postcolonial critique’.","PeriodicalId":42778,"journal":{"name":"Sociologus","volume":"67 1","pages":"83-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/SOC.67.1.83","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the late 19th and early 20th centuries South Asian intellectuals began to develop a specifically Indian political economy – ostensibly grounded in Indigenous interests, values, norms, knowledge systems, and practices – as a response to the failure of the British colonial government to bring ‘moral and material improvement’ to the subcontinent. The article examines the relationship between colonial knowledge/power and the anti-hegemonic project of an Indian political economy, which claims to assert ‘Indigenous’ knowledge as counter-knowledge, but continues to share the same discursive space as orthodox political economy. The contribution explores how the alterity and indigeneity of Indian political economy was justfied and discusses the power relations in which the legitimacy of this alterity was enmeshed. Finally, the article analyses the limits set to the emancipatory impetus of such an ‘indigenous, postcolonial critique’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1870-1920年(后)殖民地印度的知识/权力:作为反知识的印度政治经济与殖民秩序的转变
19世纪末和20世纪初,南亚知识分子开始发展一种独特的印度政治经济学——表面上以土著利益、价值观、规范、知识体系和实践为基础——作为对英国殖民政府未能给次大陆带来“道德和物质改善”的回应。本文考察了殖民知识/权力与印度政治经济学的反霸权计划之间的关系,后者声称“本土”知识是反知识,但继续与正统政治经济学共享相同的话语空间。这篇文章探讨了印度政治经济的多元性和原生性是如何被证明的,并讨论了这种多元性的合法性所涉及的权力关系。最后,文章分析了这种“本土的、后殖民的批判”对解放动力的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologus
Sociologus Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Struggle to be an Icon. Iranian Women’s Perspectives on Female Identities in Transnational Contexts (Dis)avling Sacrifice: Veterans’ Classification in Iran Discussion Paper. The Anti-Refugee Machine: A Draft Framework for Migration Studies Tagungsbericht. „Terrains Mouvants. L’ethnologie de Hilde et Richard Thurnwald/Unsichere Felder. Hilde und Richard Thurnwalds Ethnologie/Changing Fields. Hilde And Richard Thurnwald’s Ethnology“,7.–9. Juli 2021, Paris A Bridge that Divides: Hostile Infrastructures. Coloniality and Watchfulness in San Diego, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1