Acelerómetros y cuestionarios en el estudio de actividad física y la conducta sedentaria

N. Bazán, Fernando A. Laíño, N. Echandía, C. Valenti
{"title":"Acelerómetros y cuestionarios en el estudio de actividad física y la conducta sedentaria","authors":"N. Bazán, Fernando A. Laíño, N. Echandía, C. Valenti","doi":"10.28997/ruefd.v0i13.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem: It is important to know the levels of physical activity and sedentary time of people to be able to perform interventions in order to improve lifestyles. Therefore, it is interesting to compare how the physical activity, mass-used and low-cost questionnaires perform, with the accelerometers that provide objective measurements.Objective: to compare physical activity and sedentary time in a group of adults measured by accelerometry and estimated through what was reported in a self-reported physical activity questionnaire. Methods: 12 men and 17 women, mean age of 34.14 years (9.46DS). Accelerometry: each subject carried, at the level of the right hip and secured with a belt, a CSA 7164 uniaxial accelerometer for a week and completed the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), proposed by the World Health Organization. Results: the t-test of related samples was used showing that there are significant differences between the average sedentary time measured with the accelerometer and with the questionnaire, (p = 0.00). The Wilcoxon test compared the physical activity measured with the accelerometer and with the questionnaire that showed significant differences (p = 0.009). A weak positive correlation (r = 0.45) in time (p = 0.014) could be observed, meaning that both devices register it with the same trend. Conclusion: Care must be taken when interpreting the results of physical activity questionnaires since in general they may present significantly different values ​​than those reported by objective methods. It is necessary to improve the questionnaires, or their interpretation.","PeriodicalId":32276,"journal":{"name":"Revista Universitaria de la Educacion Fisica y el Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Universitaria de la Educacion Fisica y el Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28997/ruefd.v0i13.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Problem: It is important to know the levels of physical activity and sedentary time of people to be able to perform interventions in order to improve lifestyles. Therefore, it is interesting to compare how the physical activity, mass-used and low-cost questionnaires perform, with the accelerometers that provide objective measurements.Objective: to compare physical activity and sedentary time in a group of adults measured by accelerometry and estimated through what was reported in a self-reported physical activity questionnaire. Methods: 12 men and 17 women, mean age of 34.14 years (9.46DS). Accelerometry: each subject carried, at the level of the right hip and secured with a belt, a CSA 7164 uniaxial accelerometer for a week and completed the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), proposed by the World Health Organization. Results: the t-test of related samples was used showing that there are significant differences between the average sedentary time measured with the accelerometer and with the questionnaire, (p = 0.00). The Wilcoxon test compared the physical activity measured with the accelerometer and with the questionnaire that showed significant differences (p = 0.009). A weak positive correlation (r = 0.45) in time (p = 0.014) could be observed, meaning that both devices register it with the same trend. Conclusion: Care must be taken when interpreting the results of physical activity questionnaires since in general they may present significantly different values ​​than those reported by objective methods. It is necessary to improve the questionnaires, or their interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体活动和久坐行为研究中的加速度计和问卷
问题:了解人们的身体活动水平和久坐时间很重要,这样才能进行干预,改善生活方式。因此,将体力活动、大量使用和低成本问卷的表现与提供客观测量的加速度计进行比较是很有趣的。目的:比较一组成年人的体育活动和久坐时间,通过加速度计测量,并通过自我报告的体育活动问卷进行估计。方法:12名男性和17名女性,平均年龄34.14岁(9.46DS)。加速度计:每个受试者在右髋水平并用皮带固定CSA 7164单轴加速度计一周,并完成世界卫生组织提出的全球身体活动问卷(GPAQ)。结果:对相关样本进行t检验,结果表明加速度计测得的平均久坐时间与问卷测得的久坐时间存在显著差异,(p=0.00)。Wilcoxon测试比较了加速度计和问卷测量的体力活动,结果显示出显著差异(p=0.009)。可以观察到时间上的弱正相关(r=0.45)(p=0.014),这意味着两种设备都有相同的趋势。结论:在解释体育活动问卷的结果时必须小心,因为一般来说,它们可能呈现出明显不同的价值​​比那些通过客观方法报道的要多。有必要改进调查问卷或其解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relación entre el IMC, las funciones motoras y cognitivas en niños escolares Procesos de inclusión educativa y actividad física en personas con discapacidad Análisis de las demandas físicas intervinientes en un juego reducido para futbolistas La enseñanza de las actividades acuáticas escolares y sus supuestos teóricos subyacentes EVALUACIÓN DEL PICO DE POTENCIA MÁXIMA EN DEPORTISTAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1