Round table: is the common ground between pragmatism and critical realism more important than the differences?

IF 3.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Journal of Critical Realism Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1080/14767430.2022.2073674
Karin Zotzmann, Emily Barman, D. Porpora, M. Carrigan, Dave Elder-Vass
{"title":"Round table: is the common ground between pragmatism and critical realism more important than the differences?","authors":"Karin Zotzmann, Emily Barman, D. Porpora, M. Carrigan, Dave Elder-Vass","doi":"10.1080/14767430.2022.2073674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One theme of this special issue is an incitement to reconsider the relationship between pragmatism and critical realism. While their advocates sometimes come into conflict, there are also clearly borrowings and overlaps between the traditions, and we therefore invited scholars with feet in either or indeed both camps to discuss their relationship. The discussion was conducted virtually, with participants submitting initial contributions, reviewing each other’s submissions, and then responding to each other in their second round of contributions.","PeriodicalId":45557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Realism","volume":"21 1","pages":"352 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Realism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2022.2073674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT One theme of this special issue is an incitement to reconsider the relationship between pragmatism and critical realism. While their advocates sometimes come into conflict, there are also clearly borrowings and overlaps between the traditions, and we therefore invited scholars with feet in either or indeed both camps to discuss their relationship. The discussion was conducted virtually, with participants submitting initial contributions, reviewing each other’s submissions, and then responding to each other in their second round of contributions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圆桌会议:实用主义和批判现实主义之间的共同点比差异更重要吗?
本期特刊的一个主题是激发人们重新思考实用主义与批判现实主义之间的关系。虽然他们的支持者有时会发生冲突,但在传统之间也有明显的借鉴和重叠,因此我们邀请了来自其中一个阵营或实际上两个阵营的学者来讨论他们的关系。讨论是通过虚拟方式进行的,参与者提交了最初的文章,审查了彼此的文章,然后在第二轮文章中相互回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
30.80%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Bridge building, medical sociology and beyond: an interview with Graham Scambler Intersectionality of gender and age (‘gender*age’): a critical realist approach to explaining older women’s increased homelessness The reflexivity of innovators from Poland through the lens of critical realism When critical realism was ‘new' and what came after: an interview with William Outhwaite Social security in the Balkans volume 2, an overview of social policy in the Republics of North Macedonia and Montenegro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1