The fourth nature of the contemporary city: from Rio de Janeiro to Seattle, Washington

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF GARDENS & DESIGNED LANDSCAPES Pub Date : 2020-02-20 DOI:10.1080/14601176.2019.1706893
Barbara Boifava
{"title":"The fourth nature of the contemporary city: from Rio de Janeiro to Seattle, Washington","authors":"Barbara Boifava","doi":"10.1080/14601176.2019.1706893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of ‘fourth nature’, intended as the nature of the city, will be developed through an examination of the urban forest projects of two important experiences in modern landscape design: Roberto Burle Marx’s Aterro do Flamengo in Rio de Janeiro, and the Seattle Freeway Park by Lawrence Halprin & Associates. These works suggest an entirely new project for public space — intended as the transposition of an original landscape and a native ecology, such as the Floresta da Tijuca in Rio de Janeiro, and the original ‘old growth’ forest of Seattle. The definition of ‘fourth nature’ is added to the three different categories of nature as described in the literature of landscape studies: a ‘first nature’, seen as wild, luxuriant and uncontaminated, is connected to a ‘second nature’ identified by Cicero as the cultural landscape that is productive and shaped by human activity (agriculture, urban development, roads etc.). To these two definitions the garden can be appended as a ‘third nature’, shaped for aesthetic purposes and designed as a combination of nature and culture. The urban question is thus enhanced with a new poetic that, following the idea of ‘fourth nature’, promotes a harmonious growth of the city wherein its natural dimension bestows a new and more effective meaning in the form of open public space. This is evidently not the same idea of ‘fourth nature’ as described by John Dixon Hunt, regarding the symbolic and ideal spaces in landscape design generated by literature on gardens, and his considering it as the ‘verbal, conceptual existence beyond its practical aspects’. Connected to the definition of ‘fourth nature’, there is also the ‘four natures approach’ that is applied to urban reality by Ingo Kowarik as a conceptual framework in which to structure and communicate a variety of green spaces within urban borders. In this case the ‘fourth nature’ identified by the German landscape ecologist includes the spontaneous plant-life that develops in brownfield sites in abandoned areas of the postindustrial cites, which is different from an image of nature incorporated in the city and from the city that I intend to present with this article. What distinguishes this new poetics of nature is its basis in a recognized ecological paradigm, and its capacity to shed light on a new functional aesthetic that can be applied in the urban landscape. My research centers on a renewed relationship between the city and nature starting with the evaluation of the effective natural scale of an urban project, as a specific model in the development of the contemporary city based on an awareness of Ecology’s role in the processes of urban planning. The urban scene becomes a field of experimentation of strongly innovative approaches that are capable of evoking natural processes, while validating formal and ideological reflections of a profound ecological significance. In particular, the Parque do Flamengo in Rio de Janeiro at the beginning of the 1960s and the Freeway Park in Seattle one decade later, both introduce unprecedented categories of places that become episodes of exceptional relevance for the originality of their formation, their particular amplification of the effects of nature, and the value they hold in the culture of the landscape project.","PeriodicalId":53992,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF GARDENS & DESIGNED LANDSCAPES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14601176.2019.1706893","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF GARDENS & DESIGNED LANDSCAPES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14601176.2019.1706893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The concept of ‘fourth nature’, intended as the nature of the city, will be developed through an examination of the urban forest projects of two important experiences in modern landscape design: Roberto Burle Marx’s Aterro do Flamengo in Rio de Janeiro, and the Seattle Freeway Park by Lawrence Halprin & Associates. These works suggest an entirely new project for public space — intended as the transposition of an original landscape and a native ecology, such as the Floresta da Tijuca in Rio de Janeiro, and the original ‘old growth’ forest of Seattle. The definition of ‘fourth nature’ is added to the three different categories of nature as described in the literature of landscape studies: a ‘first nature’, seen as wild, luxuriant and uncontaminated, is connected to a ‘second nature’ identified by Cicero as the cultural landscape that is productive and shaped by human activity (agriculture, urban development, roads etc.). To these two definitions the garden can be appended as a ‘third nature’, shaped for aesthetic purposes and designed as a combination of nature and culture. The urban question is thus enhanced with a new poetic that, following the idea of ‘fourth nature’, promotes a harmonious growth of the city wherein its natural dimension bestows a new and more effective meaning in the form of open public space. This is evidently not the same idea of ‘fourth nature’ as described by John Dixon Hunt, regarding the symbolic and ideal spaces in landscape design generated by literature on gardens, and his considering it as the ‘verbal, conceptual existence beyond its practical aspects’. Connected to the definition of ‘fourth nature’, there is also the ‘four natures approach’ that is applied to urban reality by Ingo Kowarik as a conceptual framework in which to structure and communicate a variety of green spaces within urban borders. In this case the ‘fourth nature’ identified by the German landscape ecologist includes the spontaneous plant-life that develops in brownfield sites in abandoned areas of the postindustrial cites, which is different from an image of nature incorporated in the city and from the city that I intend to present with this article. What distinguishes this new poetics of nature is its basis in a recognized ecological paradigm, and its capacity to shed light on a new functional aesthetic that can be applied in the urban landscape. My research centers on a renewed relationship between the city and nature starting with the evaluation of the effective natural scale of an urban project, as a specific model in the development of the contemporary city based on an awareness of Ecology’s role in the processes of urban planning. The urban scene becomes a field of experimentation of strongly innovative approaches that are capable of evoking natural processes, while validating formal and ideological reflections of a profound ecological significance. In particular, the Parque do Flamengo in Rio de Janeiro at the beginning of the 1960s and the Freeway Park in Seattle one decade later, both introduce unprecedented categories of places that become episodes of exceptional relevance for the originality of their formation, their particular amplification of the effects of nature, and the value they hold in the culture of the landscape project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代城市的第四个本质:从里约热内卢到华盛顿州的西雅图
“第四自然”的概念,作为城市的自然,将通过对现代景观设计中两个重要经验的城市森林项目的研究来发展:Roberto Burle Marx在里约热内卢de Janeiro的Aterro do Flamengo和Lawrence Halprin & Associates的西雅图高速公路公园。这些作品提出了一个全新的公共空间项目,旨在作为原始景观和原生生态的转换,例如里约热内卢的弗洛雷斯塔·达·蒂茹卡,以及西雅图原始的“老生长”森林。“第四自然”的定义被添加到景观研究文献中描述的三种不同类别的自然中:“第一自然”,被视为野生的,繁茂的和未受污染的,与西塞罗所确定的“第二自然”相关联,即由人类活动(农业,城市发展,道路等)塑造的生产性文化景观。根据这两种定义,花园可以被附加为“第三自然”,以审美为目的,并被设计为自然与文化的结合。因此,城市问题被一种新的诗意所强化,遵循“第四自然”的理念,促进城市的和谐发展,其中自然维度以开放公共空间的形式赋予了新的更有效的意义。这显然与约翰·迪克森·亨特所描述的“第四自然”不同,约翰·迪克森·亨特认为园林文学产生的景观设计中的象征性和理想空间,他认为它是“超越实际方面的口头、概念存在”。与“第四自然”的定义相关,Ingo Kowarik将“四种自然方法”应用于城市现实,作为一个概念框架,在城市边界内构建和交流各种绿色空间。在这种情况下,德国景观生态学家确定的“第四自然”包括在后工业城市废弃地区的棕地中自然生长的植物生命,这与融入城市的自然形象以及我打算在本文中呈现的城市形象不同。这种新的自然诗学的区别在于它建立在公认的生态范式的基础上,它能够揭示一种新的功能美学,这种美学可以应用于城市景观。我的研究重点是城市与自然之间的新关系,从评估城市项目的有效自然规模开始,作为当代城市发展的特定模式,基于对生态学在城市规划过程中的作用的认识。城市景观成为一个强有力的创新方法的实验领域,这些方法能够唤起自然过程,同时验证具有深刻生态意义的形式和意识形态反映。特别是,20世纪60年代初在里约热内卢的弗拉门戈公园和十年后在西雅图的高速公路公园,都引入了前所未有的地方类别,这些地方因其形成的原创性,对自然影响的特殊放大,以及它们在景观项目文化中的价值而成为特殊相关的剧集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes addresses itself to readers with a serious interest in the subject, and is now established as the main place in which to publish scholarly work on all aspects of garden history. The journal"s main emphasis is on detailed and documentary analysis of specific sites in all parts of the world, with focus on both design and reception. The journal is also specifically interested in garden and landscape history as part of wider contexts such as social and cultural history and geography, aesthetics, technology, (most obviously horticulture), presentation and conservation.
期刊最新文献
Philosophy of gardening and a sense for scents. An environmental ethics perspective Making the scent of the perfumer’s garden: imperial and common plague remedies used during the Antonine Plague (approx. 165–190 CE) Gardens as spaces of physical and mental well-being in ancient literature Garden Cities of yesterday, roots of urban sustainability? Radical histories of times of revolution and their legacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1